Does memory speed impact Xeon E3-1270 v6 performance?

Carfax83

Diamond Member
Nov 1, 2010
6,841
1,536
136
From what I've seen and read, dual channel CPUs tend to be more sensitive to memory speed than say quad channel CPUs, due to having less cache.
 

Lil'John

Senior member
Dec 28, 2013
287
31
91
Implying this isn't a normal CPU?
Implying it is more of a workstation CPU and not a consumer CPU. You know, features that professionals want like ECC memory.

Any other words of wisdom to add to this thread aside from a nit-pick?
 

XavierMace

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2013
4,307
450
126
My point is it's still the same core technology. In this case it's a "normal" Kaby Lake CPU with a little bit of extra features. If you know the "normal" CPU's impact performance, then you have the answer to your question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whm1974

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
It's basically a standard Kaby Lake CPU with ECC support, and no IGP. A little faster base than an i7-7700, with a slightly higher TDP to match.

If the board allows the memory to run faster, it will perform better, just like any KL chip. They like memory bandwidth.

https://ark.intel.com/compare/97128,97479
 

Lil'John

Senior member
Dec 28, 2013
287
31
91
It's basically a standard Kaby Lake CPU with ECC support, and no IGP. A little faster base than an i7-7700, with a slightly higher TDP to match.

If the board allows the memory to run faster, it will perform better, just like any KL chip. They like memory bandwidth.

https://ark.intel.com/compare/97128,97479

Thank you for the information.

I am looking at the Supermicro X11SSZ-TLN4F:
https://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon/C236_C232/X11SSZ-TLN4F.cfm
It allows me memory speeds from 2166 to 2666... or $200 to $240 per 16GB.

My intention is to max it out(64GB) for file server, media server, and camera recording duties.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
I suspect that for those duties, you will not be able to notice any difference in performance from 2133 to 2666 unless you benchmark it, but I tend to think of 2133 as "slow" and personally would get 2400 minimum.

That said, if the 2666 is not much more expensive...