Hayabusa Rider
Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
He didnt say "Read my lips"
Not yet that was his dad🙂
They say the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
He didnt say "Read my lips"
Not yet that was his dad🙂
Originally posted by: ToBeMe
Not anymore than Clinton lieing about sex or other things............Bush 1 about taxes among other things.........Reagan about all sorts of things.....(pre altheimers????LOL) .........................Carter......................Ford...................Nixon..................Johnson...............Kennedy............................and so on!😉Does it bother any of you conservatives Bush lied again?
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Remember during the SotU when bush said he'd have a UN vote on a new resolution "to see where they stand" but now has reniged on the promise he made? This is'nt the first lie bush tells us. And it's not a serious lie but is honesty even cared about anymore by us rupbs/dems alike so long as it meets our politcal objectives? We seem very dismisive of holding politicians accountable for what they say.
Chiraq made it clear that he would veto ANY resolution. The purpose of the forcing a vote was to get members of the security council to show their cards.
The French have already showed theirs so what's the point.
President Bush has made this clear. You're just not listening.
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Originally posted by: ToBeMe
Not anymore than Clinton lieing about sex or other things............Bush 1 about taxes among other things.........Reagan about all sorts of things.....(pre altheimers????LOL) .........................Carter......................Ford...................Nixon..................Johnson...............Kennedy............................and so on!😉Does it bother any of you conservatives Bush lied again?
Hmm I was around when both Cater and Reagan was pres. They never lied near what these new guys do. Also they did'nt use confusing nice sounding terminology to make bad things seem unpleasant for us. Like Collateral Damage, like that's privaliged and all sorts of good PC speak to hide thier agenda and make us feel less bad about it.
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Remember during the SotU when bush said he'd have a UN vote on a new resolution "to see where they stand" but now has reniged on the promise he made? This is'nt the first lie bush tells us. And it's not a serious lie but is honesty even cared about anymore by us rupbs/dems alike so long as it meets our politcal objectives? We seem very dismisive of holding politicians accountable for what they say.
Chiraq made it clear that he would veto ANY resolution. The purpose of the forcing a vote was to get members of the security council to show their cards.
The French have already showed theirs so what's the point.
President Bush has made this clear. You're just not listening.
So what's the point?? To see everyone elses cards!!
Bush doesn't want the embarrassment of the US/UK resolution only receiving 4 yes votes. This would point out the obvious that the world is against US policy.
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Originally posted by: ToBeMe
Not anymore than Clinton lieing about sex or other things............Bush 1 about taxes among other things.........Reagan about all sorts of things.....(pre altheimers????LOL) .........................Carter......................Ford...................Nixon..................Johnson...............Kennedy............................and so on!😉Does it bother any of you conservatives Bush lied again?
Hmm I was around when both Cater and Reagan was pres. They never lied near what these new guys do. Also they did'nt use confusing nice sounding terminology to make bad things seem unpleasant for us. Like Collateral Damage, like that's privaliged and all sorts of good PC speak to hide thier agenda and make us feel less bad about it.
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Remember during the SotU when bush said he'd have a UN vote on a new resolution "to see where they stand" but now has reniged on the promise he made? This is'nt the first lie bush tells us. And it's not a serious lie but is honesty even cared about anymore by us rupbs/dems alike so long as it meets our politcal objectives? We seem very dismisive of holding politicians accountable for what they say.
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Remember during the SotU when bush said he'd have a UN vote on a new resolution "to see where they stand" but now has reniged on the promise he made? This is'nt the first lie bush tells us. And it's not a serious lie but is honesty even cared about anymore by us rupbs/dems alike so long as it meets our politcal objectives? We seem very dismisive of holding politicians accountable for what they say.
Chiraq made it clear that he would veto ANY resolution. The purpose of the forcing a vote was to get members of the security council to show their cards.
The French have already showed theirs so what's the point.
President Bush has made this clear. You're just not listening.
No need to be an ass.Originally posted by: Corn
The text of Bush's last state of the union address.
I do not see anywhere where he "promises" to seek another resolution.
Thus far the only "lie" I've witnessed is the premise of this thread. You anti-Bush parrots will make up anything won't you?
Originally posted by: Corn
The text of Bush's last state of the union address.
I do not see anywhere where he "promises" to seek another resolution.
Thus far the only "lie" I've witnessed is the premise of this thread. You anti-Bush parrots will make up anything won't you?
Originally posted by: Corn
The text of Bush's last state of the union address.
I do not see anywhere where he "promises" to seek another resolution.
Thus far the only "lie" I've witnessed is the premise of this thread. You anti-Bush parrots will make up anything won't you?
BUSH: Well, first, I don't think -- it basically says that he is in defiance of 1441. That's what the resolution says.
And it's hard to believe anybody saying he isn't in defiance of 1441 because 1441 said he must disarm.
And yes, we'll call for a vote.
QUESTION: No matter what?
BUSH: No matter what the whip count is, we're calling for the vote. We want to see people stand up and say what their opinion is about Saddam Hussein and the utility of the United Nations Security Council.
And so, you bet. It's time for people to show their cards, let the world know where they stand when it comes to Saddam.
Originally posted by: ToBeMe
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Originally posted by: ToBeMe
Not anymore than Clinton lieing about sex or other things............Bush 1 about taxes among other things.........Reagan about all sorts of things.....(pre altheimers????LOL) .........................Carter......................Ford...................Nixon..................Johnson...............Kennedy............................and so on!😉Does it bother any of you conservatives Bush lied again?
Hmm I was around when both Cater and Reagan was pres. They never lied near what these new guys do. Also they did'nt use confusing nice sounding terminology to make bad things seem unpleasant for us. Like Collateral Damage, like that's privaliged and all sorts of good PC speak to hide thier agenda and make us feel less bad about it.
LOL I was old enough to see Kennedy die and all of Virtnam, be it I was young, I remember it and yes, they all do/did and perhaps one of the worst was...................(gasp) Kennedy.......................😉
No need to be an ass.
Corn the questions by reporters are not there. He did say it when asked numerous times.
Looks like a promise to me.
Originally posted by: Corn
No need to be an ass.
Corn the questions by reporters are not there. He did say it when asked numerous times.
The President does not take questions by reporters during the State of the Union address. I may be an ass, but at least my facts are in order.
Looks like a promise to me.
A "promise" to whom? Changing course as a matter of strategy does not equal a broken "promise" made to no one. At that time I'm sure Bush had intended to call for another resolution, however upon the realization that it would all be for naught, decided "why bother?" I'm not going to blame him for not wanting to fight a losing battle when the outcome has already been decided.
Originally posted by: ToBeMe
Kennedy had to take 7 script drugs a day to get through the day................3 were narcotics, plus, he was a heavy drinker...........
FDR drank a fifth of whiskey a day while in office.........................
it's a nightmare.........................and just gets worse!😉
Originally posted by: jman7272
Heh... I think GW is doing a fine job. I am prior service from the Gulf War Time and believe this needs to be done with or without the help from countries like France, (FORMERLY KNOWN AS GERMANY).