Originally posted by: DrMrLordX
Did somebody hack JEDIYoda's account?
basically added a 1000 to each listed price above....I dont see that happening.. I know they have some smithfield over supply to move, but that ain't the way INtel!!!!
Originally posted by: DrMrLordX
Did somebody hack JEDIYoda's account?
I've heard that it's compatible with certain 975X chipset motherboards, like Intel's BadAxe.Originally posted by: tanishalfelven
is conroe compatible with current intell mobo's
Originally posted by: tanishalfelven
yeah it seems he edited it. anyway i think conroe-L (single core) should come out now instead of later next years. who's gonna buy a single core next year ?
also is conroe compatible with current intell mobo's. (i mean withotu hard mods)
Originally posted by: tanishalfelven
i thought conroe was made like the P-Ds. 2 cores stuck togather. not like X2's where 2 cores a buillt on the same wafer (is the info correct)
Originally posted by: tanishalfelven
i thought conroe was made like the P-Ds. 2 cores stuck togather. not like X2's where 2 cores a buillt on the same wafer (is the info correct)
I can't answer the first question, but using one piece of silicon can have significant performance advantages, as the A64 X2 & Core Duo have shown us. One thing is that the I don't think that the L2 cache is shared between the two cores in the Pentium Ds. In Core 2 Duo the cache is shared. This minimizes trips across the front side bus, which is a bottleneck.Originally posted by: tanishalfelven
dose'nt that [putting two cores on one piece of silicon] have yield issues. i mean is it really a performance advantage.
As an interesting example, if Intel or AMD built a CPU that came with it's own phase change cooling built in overclocked it like mad (say a 3.6 GHz FX chip), it would obviously suck up a LOT more power but it's TDP would actually decrease...
Originally posted by: Questar
As an interesting example, if Intel or AMD built a CPU that came with it's own phase change cooling built in overclocked it like mad (say a 3.6 GHz FX chip), it would obviously suck up a LOT more power but it's TDP would actually decrease...
Wrong.
TDP would stay the same. You would still have to move the heat off the phase change device.
Originally posted by: TekDemon
Originally posted by: Questar
As an interesting example, if Intel or AMD built a CPU that came with it's own phase change cooling built in overclocked it like mad (say a 3.6 GHz FX chip), it would obviously suck up a LOT more power but it's TDP would actually decrease...
Wrong.
TDP would stay the same. You would still have to move the heat off the phase change device.
Actually since the phase change cooler isn't 100% efficient (because nothing really is) you'd be putting out more heat and power power lol.