• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Doctors remove baby's second head

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
My Dad always said that two heads were better than . . . oh, never mind. :roll:
 
I'm curious to know if they used part of the skull from the "parasite" to reconstruct the "host" child's skull?
 
Damn, that's a tough choice to make, after seeing the other face. I suppose it did have a brain and would have been able to think and all, but its vital functions were performed by the kid with the rest of the body.
I generally side with the anti-abortion school of thought, but I don't see where they had much of a choice here. Hope the baby girl is okay.
rose.gif
 
Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Having a working spinal column is not a prerequisite for being capable of intelligent thought. My question is theoretical: Given that anti-abortion "pro-life" people define a fertilized egg as a "human being", could not this head also be so defined? And, if so, did everyone involved in this operation conspire to commit murder?

I'll answer that question once you can give me a valid, uncontested, uncontroversial list of metaphysical categories that define "human."
 
I really hate to do this and I truly do feel wrong about saying it, but I've got to say it.

Isn't that like the human equivalent to a dual core processor? <hangs head in shame, but smiles anyway>
 
Originally posted by: Rogue
I really hate to do this and I truly do feel wrong about saying it, but I've got to say it.

Isn't that like the human equivalent to a dual core processor? <hangs head in shame, but smiles anyway>


I laughed
 
Originally posted by: MadCowDisease
Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Having a working spinal column is not a prerequisite for being capable of intelligent thought. My question is theoretical: Given that anti-abortion "pro-life" people define a fertilized egg as a "human being", could not this head also be so defined? And, if so, did everyone involved in this operation conspire to commit murder?

I'll answer that question once you can give me a valid, uncontested, uncontroversial list of metaphysical categories that define "human."

Your post is worthless, since obviously if such lists existed the answers to those questions would be obvious and no one would need to explain them.
 
Back
Top