Do you use Mozilla/Netscape?

[gtsukada]

Originally posted by: JC
Mozilla Firebird here.

 

[FrustratedUser]

Originally posted by: JC
Mozilla Firebird here.

 

[theplanb]

I just installed mozilla firebird and I must say this is the closest thing that may well convert me to the umm light side?
The tab obviously adds another dimension to the browsing.

 

[Kadarin]

Also a Mozilla user since about 0.9.4 here.. The fact that you have to install extra software to get a popup blocker in IE is ludicrous, as are the NUMEROUS security issues with it. Remote root exploits through a freakin' web browser? Gah... Puke.

 

[ThaGrandCow]

do I? no.

 

[Mitzi]

Firebird all the way...

 

[Huma]

I tried out firebird but switched back to mozilla.

better integration of mail/news than fire/thunderbird, moz was almost as fast on my box (2500+/1gb ram), and firebird still carries a few bugs that moz fixed a long time ago. I also liked the UI for moz better than firebird, particularly the bookmark management and searching in the URL.

that said, I love moz.

(I'm a front-end web developer by trade.)

 

[BaboonGuy]

advertising another thread with this thread? shame on you.

 

[PowerMacG5]

Both Firebird and IE. I would like to see all the alt commands that work in IE with fusetalk to work on Firebird.

 

[NuclearFusi0n]

Originally posted by: JC
Mozilla Firebird here.

It's not like I can use IE anyways, yay linux

 

[dnuggett]

Firebird and Netscape 7.1 lite...

 

[Dragon365]

Firebird/Phoenix since 0.1

 

[Biggs]

Latest Firebird 0.7 pptimized build here.

 

[thebestMAX]

Firebird and Thunderbird for e-mail. No one mentioned that yet.

 

[Tetsuo]

Myie2 for web, thunderbird for mail

 

Originally posted by: JC
Mozilla Firebird here.

Me too, love it!

 

[BillGates]

No way - they're too bloated. I need applications to open the instant I click on them - waiting for daily-use software such as a browser or media player to open for more than 0.5 seconds is not cool.

 

[OulOat]

Originally posted by: BillGates
No way - they're too bloated. I need applications to open the instant I click on them - waiting for daily-use software such as a browser or media player to open for more than 0.5 seconds is not cool.

Ha, I clicked on IE first then Firebird, but FB started first

 

[alareau]

mozilla 1.5 here. Rarely use ie anymore

 

[BillGates]

Originally posted by: OulOat

Originally posted by: BillGates
No way - they're too bloated. I need applications to open the instant I click on them - waiting for daily-use software such as a browser or media player to open for more than 0.5 seconds is not cool.

Ha, I clicked on IE first then Firebird, but FB started first

your puter is too slow

 

[Danman]

Originally posted by: cpals
no.

 

[bandana163]

No, I prefer Opera.

 

[Growltiger]

Firebird, Thunderbird, and Avant Browser for IE

 

[OulOat]

Originally posted by: BillGates

Originally posted by: OulOat

Originally posted by: BillGates
No way - they're too bloated. I need applications to open the instant I click on them - waiting for daily-use software such as a browser or media player to open for more than 0.5 seconds is not cool.

Ha, I clicked on IE first then Firebird, but FB started first

your puter is too slow

What does is matter how fast my comp is? Faster programs starts faster than slower progs on any comp. BTW, when did an Althon XP 1700 become slow?

 

[Zenmervolt]

Originally posted by: BillGates

Originally posted by: OulOat

Originally posted by: BillGates
No way - they're too bloated. I need applications to open the instant I click on them - waiting for daily-use software such as a browser or media player to open for more than 0.5 seconds is not cool.

Ha, I clicked on IE first then Firebird, but FB started first

your puter is too slow

It's slower because it booted Firebird faster? 😕

ZV