Do you trust that Hillary Clinton is honest? (public poll)

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Do you believe Hillary Clinton is honest / trustworthy?

  • I believe that Hillary Clinton is honest / trustworthy.

  • I believe that Hillary Clinton is dishonest / untrustworthy.


Results are only viewable after voting.

rga

Senior member
Nov 9, 2011
640
2
81
I voted for Hillary in this poll the same way I would have voted for any politician in this poll.
 

BurnItDwn

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
26,338
1,848
126
Of course she is dishonest, she is a freiking mother truckin politician who is well connected and has been in the game a long time. Everything she says is calculated and nothing she does or says is genuine. She is part of the problem with American Politics.
 

Bart*Simpson

Senior member
Jul 21, 2015
602
4
36
www.canadaka.net
Says an admitted bigoted piece of shit.

Well, I suppose that at least makes him more honest and trustworthy than Hillary who keeps changing her story about the stupid emails.

Seriously, this whole email thing would've blown over by now if she hadn't insisted on lying every step of the way.
 

mect

Platinum Member
Jan 5, 2004
2,424
1,637
136
This is what I don't get. Bernie Sanders and Hilary Clinton have pretty comparable stances on things, but everyone agrees Sanders is far and away more honest and trustworthy, but Hilary is apparently running away with the nomination. Really drives home the point that our leaders are bought and paid for by someone.
 

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126
Hillary Clinton is actually more valuable to corporate America than a republican, they might have to give a little more, but they can count on her to keep real liberals and what's left of unions in check while pushing through whatever legislation big business wants.
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
This is what I don't get. Bernie Sanders and Hilary Clinton have pretty comparable stances on things, but everyone agrees Sanders is far and away more honest and trustworthy, but Hilary is apparently running away with the nomination. Really drives home the point that our leaders are bought and paid for by someone.

It was the same thing with Romney. The voters pick partly based on who they think will win. The Left thinks Hilary has the best chance. The right has gone full retard and is going with Trump right now. I think as push comes to shove, they will pick someone other than Trump, but its the left so maybe not.
 

disappoint

Lifer
Dec 7, 2009
10,132
382
126
I'm not voting for honest/trustworthy politicians, I don't think they exist. i don't think the nature of the job allows it. I'm voting for someone I trust won't fuck up the country, and so far, my vote would lie with her.

You really think she won't fuck up the country? She seems a little batty.

Hilary: "There were snipers shooting at us and stuff! It was so exciting and scary!..."

Journalists: "There were no reports of snipers shooting at you Hilary"

Hilaryious: "Yes there were! Well I thought there were...I swore I saw them...I...uh..."

I'm paraphrasing but she seemed a tad out of touch with reality there. Maybe it was just a bad day for her cognitive functioning. Maybe she was having a mini-stroke. She's entitled to a little stroke now and then like her husband. Maybe they can stroke each other off into retirement.

I kid though. Her husband was a great president. I knew he would be great when 10/10 Nobel prize winning economists endorsed his economic plan. I don't really GAF about the stained dress. Hilaryious on the other hand is just bat shit goofy by comparison.

Triumpf the insult comic CEO seems only slightly less goofy.
 

flexy

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
8,464
155
106
I not only dislike here because she is dishonest and elitist, I also dislike her because I can't even see why she is a "democrat".

Current make-up of US politics:

[Ultra conservative nutters] <----> [Rather conservative]

Democrat my a$$ :)
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,240
136
I voted "yes" only because I have no reason to believe that she is less honest than an average pol. Not because I find her particularly honest.
 

Hugo Drax

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2011
5,647
47
91
The sad thing is Clinton is the best foot they can put forward apparently. She reminds me of Nixon.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
She's evil. And dishonorable. And more so than most politicians. Which is why I genuinely dislike her.

Sadly, much like Adolf Hitler and Joey Stalin, she's also quit capable. That makes her extremely dangerous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ichinisan

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
But it shouldn't.

The people we elect to lead this country, and hold honorable positions above us, should squash her, and other assaults on America.

I guess the whole system is busted...

-John
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,840
4,941
136
But it shouldn't.

The people we elect to lead this country, and hold honorable positions above us, should squash her, and other assaults on America.

I guess the whole system is busted...

-John


That or you're kind of a nut.

Occam's razor
 

Hugo Drax

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2011
5,647
47
91
But it shouldn't.

The people we elect to lead this country, and hold honorable positions above us, should squash her, and other assaults on America.

I guess the whole system is busted...

-John

We do not elect people, We are provided people we can choose from. They are curated carefully by the fatcats and then presented to the public to choose from. We are a banana republic.

People think they really get to choose who becomes president, and other types of politicians and that they will have our best interests.

The funny thing is how people fawn over Clinton, they actually think she really cares for them. LOLOLO Fools.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
That's the difference between a representative government, and a democratically elected Government.

We're supposed to be smart enough to elect representatives to government.

Today, it's pretty clear that Government has taken over.

They no longer represent people.

-John
 

Hugo Drax

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2011
5,647
47
91
That's the difference between a representative government, and a democratically elected Government.

We're supposed to be smart enough to elect representatives to government.

Today, it's pretty clear that Government has taken over.

They no longer represent people.

-John

Government has not taken over, a small population that represents the majority of the wealth has taken over the government. Now the government is just the enforcement arm of this population.

Like a good banana republic, you have the same perma-politicians in congress, funded by lobbyists and working for their interests.

Then you get your choice of presidents to choose from. The great Bush III or The great Clinton II. (vetted and funded by the lobbyists and special interests)

The war on drugs, he that's big business. Wars overseas, same thing. Dumb down education with NCLB and turn it into a perpetual exam cram to minimize thought and critical thinking skills.

The media, keep the public distracted, and continue the propaganda.

Best way to live in the US is figure out how to play the system and wet your beak a little. :biggrin:
 

bradley

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2000
3,671
2
81
Best way to live in the US is figure out how to play the system and wet your beak a little. :biggrin:

Exactly. Why fight the truth or pick sides? Your life will be so much happier without partisan politics. Simply game the system before it games you.
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,967
140
106
Liberals also dismissed this too:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.
 
Last edited: