mercanucaribe
Banned
By the way, who's to say that humanity wouldn't have destroyed itself already if it weren't "set back"?
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
I think we have lost technology or have been stifled in some areas. The dark ages basically held us back for hundreds of years due to the plague and famine, and war.
Originally posted by: toolboxolio
Library of Alexandria fiasco set us back a millennium or so.
There are scattered records for a steam engine design from there. Can only imagine what else was in that monstrous place.
Thank ceaser... the fvcking horny idiot.
Originally posted by: toolboxolio
Library of Alexandria fiasco set us back a millennium or so.
There are scattered records for a steam engine design from there. Can only imagine what else was in that monstrous place.
Thank ceaser... the fvcking horny idiot.
Originally posted by: DaShen
Originally posted by: toolboxolio
Library of Alexandria fiasco set us back a millennium or so.
There are scattered records for a steam engine design from there. Can only imagine what else was in that monstrous place.
Thank ceaser... the fvcking horny idiot.
Yup.
Steam engine, Greek fire (napalm or some other incendiary), there are even mentions of flying contraptions in India and Arabia...
A lot of technology was lost in that amount of time. Much of it we have rediscovered in the last couple millenia, but a lot of masonry that was done back in the day still astounds many people.
Originally posted by: Rock Hydra
It's sad, really, that within the last hundred years or so much knowledge and intel. would have rather been destoyed than seized. years of research, destroyed by those that funded it all.
Um, no, it's not.Originally posted by: Keblerelf04
so atlantis for now is just a a much better version of Stargate Sg-1 =)
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
I think we have lost technology or have been stifled in some areas. The dark ages basically held us back for hundreds of years due to the plague and famine, and war.
Originally posted by: zinfamous
I think it's more accurate to argue that we have been held back in developing technology, or have had to re-invent, re-discover certain technologies because of the events mentioned (Alexandria, Plague, saccing of Rome, Crusades, etc...)
I think that if we rationalize some of these histories, some of this ancient technology probably mounts to myth. Here, I'm thinking about "Greek Fire." I've heard theories that the secret to creating Greek Fire was lost in Alexadria (OH, the Irony!), but modern science has never been able to reproduce it's supposed effects. Again, our evidence of this existing primarily amounts to accounts from sailers being terrorized by a superior Greek Navy. You have to assume that their accounts of massive pwning are as accurate as they remember them. If they see fire everywhere, your ship as it's being burned...then why not imagine that it's burning on the sea, as well? You would think that our vast knowledge in materials science and chemistry would be able to create something so apparently simple. Hell, we split the atom! Which begs the question "who gives a fvck about Greek Fire when we can just nuke 'em?
Currently, I think of how (due to politics, corporate interest, fundies, whatever) certain advances have been delayed to near-criminal levels. Alternative energy, embryonic stem cell research, etc. This doesn't bother me as much as it probably should, though...as I remain quite confident that the progress of technology can't be held back forever. It's a shame that asshats in power have to dictate funding due to their own personal interests, despite the potential advantages for all of humanity, but reason will always prevail, I think....despite the setbacks.