On one hand you'd think at some point yields should be good enough that they'll make more money selling GP102 as the 1080 Ti for $900. But on the other can they cut the VRAM in half to 6GB when the 1080 has 8GB? Is GP102 capable of running 8GB without any 970 style shenanigans?
On one hand you'd think at some point yields should be good enough that they'll make more money selling GP102 as the 1080 Ti for $900. But on the other can they cut the VRAM in half to 6GB when the 1080 has 8GB? Is GP102 capable of running 8GB without any 970 style shenanigans?
So everybody thinks they'll make keychains out of the cores that don't make the Titan cut?
Seems more logical in the end to salvage the chips and sell them.
I guess they could use them for workstation cards?
Big black hole in pricing structure points to something in the middle most likely.
I voted yes....But not in the market for the hope so part at least.
Cherry picked ones become Titans. The poor ones become a Ti.
They already have a 2 SM redundancy in the Titans for better yields.
![]()
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-titan-x-12gb,4700.html
The performance of the 1080 and the Titan are too close to really merit a TI right now.
They already have a 2 SM redundancy in the Titans for better yields.
![]()
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-titan-x-12gb,4700.html
The performance of the 1080 and the Titan are too close to really merit a TI right now.