<<
<< Started when I was 6 years old. That means I have been using computers for 18 years now >>
It doesn't show >>
Why? Because I dare to disagree with you? Anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot? Nice way of thinking you have there
<< No they were not nitch market's, Novell as I posted but you conciently overread cause your blinders are on WAS the king of the X86 server world in the 80's and 90's, but you knew that being you've been in computers since you were 6 (doing what playin pitfall?) >>
I thought we were talking about desktops? Show me a desktop-computer running Netware. Yes, they were big in servers. And if there's any justice in the world, they should still be. Those things redefine the word "stability". My employer had a Netware-server, and it never crashed. And I mean never. Then the company merged with another company, and it was replaced with NT.... Which has to be rebooted at least once every week.
<< You are as stupid as you post >>
Thank you, I love you too. If you have nothing meaningful to contribute besides stupid name-calling, I see no point for you to reply.
<< I listed above but again your blinders missed it, I NOTED that the AVERAGE USER likes windows due to the ease >>
And Linux is about as easy. The reason why it SEEMS difficult is because it's different from Windows.
How was my network-card installed in SuSE? It was autodetected during install, and it asked for the network settings. Just as easy as in Windows. But if that's too difficult for you, then I don't know what to say.
<< don't tell me about networks I currently work on a 70,000+ user WAN now. >>
Wow. I'm impressed.
<< BTW incase it skipped by your astonishing memory and reading compensation we were noting Linux Networking is a POS to setup in the hands of the AVERAGE user, making Windows your better choice... now was that hard? >>
How is it "hard"? In SuSE it's like this: Open Yast2 (configuration utility), choose "network", configure network. All in nice graphical environment.
True, for the average Joe Sixpack who has used nothing but Windows, a switch to Linux would be painful at first, because it's different from Windows. Not necessarily more difficult as such, but different.
<< Yes you get Linux for free and NO Support for it either >>
If you buy Linux at retail, you get support. If you are corporate-user, you can get even better support. And you can always contact third-party to get support (Linuxcare, IBM etc.). If you get Linux from the web for free, you don't get the official support from the company who made it. I see no problem with that. If you want support, you should then pay the company. But if you don't want the support, you can get it from the net.
<< Try again this is a simple ploy to sweep your non fact BS under the rug as above I've posted fact, yours is pure opinion, why is mine fact, well look at the market and the numbers.. they are there as proof, yours is a theory. >>
I'm sorry but I honestly couldn't comprehend your blabbering about games and such. You lost me there.
What I have posted here have been facts or my opinions that are supported by facts.
And again, no matter how much you talk, it doesn't change the fact that MS is a monopolist who has been convicted of abusing that monopoly. truth hurts, doesn't it
? EDIT: Fixed quoting
Facebook
Twitter