• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Do you think John Tyler was a good President?

A

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
I sure as hell do. In fact, he's my favorite President since he held truer to the principles of Jeffersonian democracy (which is in stark contrast to Wilsonian democracy) than the Founder did himself. He was the most principled, pro-hard money, pro-States' rights, anti-war, non-interventionist, anti-Central Bank, fiscal and traditional conservative if ever there was one.
 
Major Events While in Office:

Set precedent for Presidential succession (1841)
Entire Cabinet except for Daniel Webster resigned in protest (1841)
Webster-Ashburton Treaty (1842)
Treaty of Wanghia (1844)
Annexation of Texas (1845)
 
Anarchist420 said:
In fact, he's my favorite President
Click to expand...

why am i not surprised you're a fan of a failure of a 'president' ... he never was elected.. he lucked into the position... and he alienated his backers to the point he never had a chance in hell of running for re-election
 
Anarchist420 said:
John Tyler is the least harmful President from the perspective of someone who advocates a stateless society.

Anarchists advocate a stateless society.
Click to expand...


😵, except all you tend to argue about is for a minimal federal government and stronger states rights....that does not = stateless society.
 
Demo24 said:
😵, except all you tend to argue about is for a minimal federal government and stronger states rights....that does not = stateless society.
Click to expand...
That's a necessary step to a stateless society. The Articles of Confederation is almost close enough even for an anarcho-capitalist.
 
jstern01 said:
Major Events While in Office:

Set precedent for Presidential succession (1841)
Entire Cabinet except for Daniel Webster resigned in protest (1841)
Webster-Ashburton Treaty (1842)
Treaty of Wanghia (1844)
Annexation of Texas (1845)
Click to expand...

That bastard!
 
If this guy is for real, Anarchist420 claims to have never held a job, is unable to drive a car, and was classified special ed for an emotional disorder. (and I want to emphasize 'if he is for real'. It all seems too much)

Assume it is though. Is that the guy we want to take tips on how to run society from?
 
eskimospy said:
If this guy is for real, Anarchist420 claims to have never held a job, is unable to drive a car, and was classified special ed for an emotional disorder. (and I want to emphasize 'if he is for real'. It all seems too much)

Assume it is though. Is that the guy we want to take tips on how to run society from?
Click to expand...

Can you clarify this statement? How do you know so much about him?
 
momeNt said:
Can you clarify this statement? How do you know so much about him?
Click to expand...

He mentioned it in another thread recently, I can't remember which one right now. But seriously, that's all information he volunteered about himself.

It all sounds like trolling just taken a step too far, because I have a hard time believing someone is simultaneously that helpless and that oblivious to the fact that they are a living counter-example to their own ideology.
 
Anarchist420 said:
That's a necessary step to a stateless society. The Articles of Confederation is almost close enough even for an anarcho-capitalist.
Click to expand...


No it isn't, that's a step towards more localized stronger governments.

News flash, all those utopian 'no rules, everyone is equal' societal experiments have failed. Anarchy has, and always will, fail.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top