/topicMore lanes would require more pins out of the CPU, meaning a larger and more complicated socket, and a more complicated and expensive motherboard.
Hopefully the next gen socket will support a full 32 PCIe lanes. If Intel is still sticking to 16 of them by then, that should give AMD a decent edge.Not in AM4. AM5 or whatever follows AM4? Should be on PCIe4/5 by then, so we'll see.
Hopefully the next gen socket will support a full 32 PCIe lanes. If Intel is still sticking to 16 of them by then, that should give AMD a decent edge.
24? I thought the max was 20 total, 16 for PCIe x16 slots, and 4 for DMI/chipset.Yes, Intel is sticking with 16 PCIe lanes (directy connected to the CPU) but the chipset can have up to 24 PCIe 3.0 lanes.
24? I thought the max was 20 total, 16 for PCIe x16 slots, and 4 for DMI/chipset.
Additional PCI-E lanes* 24x PCI-E 3.0
*In addition to the 16 PCI-E 3.0 lanes from the CPU
Those are chipset connected lanes, not CPU connected lanes. I thought we were talking about CPU lanes.Here is a good link for the Z270:
https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Z270-vs-Z170-What-is-the-Difference-877/
Z720 at Intel Ark here.
My understanding is, that for each supported bifurcation of a PCI-E slot, comprising so many lanes, there needs to be a PCI-E "Root Port", with associated Config Space Registers. So that each PCI-E device plugged in can be recognized and supported properly.How about PCIe bifurcation for X470 or X570 (or whatever the following chipset ends up bening called)?
How much is involved with dividing the PCIe x 16 into one PCIe x8 lane and another PCIe x8 made up of two PCIe x4? (This so an adapter card with PCIe bridge chip is not needed to run two PCIe x 4 SSDs in the second PCIe x8 slot)