Originally posted by: irwincur
Big difference between selling an American owned private company to another private company, then there's selling an American owned private company to a Communist Government.
Should not matter who the buyer is.
Under your assumptions, the US government is no better than China, because they would be able to dictate to a private group what they can and can't do with their assets. This is called the slippery slope. If you prevent sale, you increase the control of the government. If you cannot sell your company to whom you choose - you might as well give the company to the US government and let them run it.
A company is either owned by an individule or a group of individules. The assets of that company are theirs. To take those assets and impose limitations on them is simply wrong. However, these days it does not surprise me as the US government is not all that far behind China.
Like I said, would you like it if your city told you that you could not sell your home to anyone from another town? This is the same concept. It is your home after all (your assets), you should be able to sell it to anyone that you want.
Ahhh, the old communism versus fascism debate.
I really don't see the link at all to Facism. If anything it is the old Communism vs. Libertarianism debate.