Battery is 3d printed
http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/19/...utm_source=Feed_Classic&utm_campaign=Engadget
http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/19/...utm_source=Feed_Classic&utm_campaign=Engadget
Makerbot has been bought out by Stratasys in a 600 million $ deal
not sure if this is a good or bad thing. there are enough competitors in the small consumer printer market that makerbot going corporate shouldnt affect the open source nature of the industry, but you have to wonder if thermoplastic extrusion resolution and size werent starting to impinge on Stratasys' lower mid end product line.
any word on how the rest of the makerbot community feels about this?
many are worried that thingiverse will be monetized
there will probably have to be some work done on establishing something equivalent to GPL for 3d object designs and variations from a base object. obviously if someone wishes to share a design and make it freely available it shouldnt be hard to manage. but if someone takes an existing object and tweaks it there will be questions as to whether they should be allowed to claim some sort of copyrights and charge for the variant version. adding corporate lawyers seems like throwing gas on the fire.
Not until they can make them as temperamental as regular printers.
Yeah... Lego has to be shitting their collective pants over this market.Yes and shortly after I predict Lego losing a ton of revenue, many Napster like lawsuits from copyright holders and some crazy "adult novelties"
Doubters can continue to doubt, but it's coming.
http://www.computerworld.com/s/arti..._buildings_in_one_day_from_recycled_materials
This is early tech. Imagine 5, 10, 20 years from now. Company shows up on your lot, sets up their machine, and in a few days your house is done.![]()
So, the words "3-D Printing" were attached to those buildings. But, if you read the article, all it did was basically pre-fabbed concrete walls. The walls and other pieces had to stay at the factory until hardened, then shipped to the job site, where they were assembled.
You surprise me on this one Dr P. You're usually quite astute, but you seem to be very quick to deny the ultimate endgame of JIT manufacturing.So, the words "3-D Printing" were attached to those buildings. But, if you read the article, all it did was basically pre-fabbed concrete walls. The walls and other pieces had to stay at the factory until hardened, then shipped to the job site, where they were assembled.
Doubters can continue to doubt, but it's coming.
http://www.computerworld.com/s/arti..._buildings_in_one_day_from_recycled_materials
This is early tech. Imagine 5, 10, 20 years from now. Company shows up on your lot, sets up their machine, and in a few days your house is done.![]()
Yeah, no. Those things are great for protyping and that is about it.
PS pre formed concrete casting <> 3d printing.
You should invent a time machine and go tell Ford how nobody is gonna want one of those horseless carriages.
But in reality...more cheap plastic shit is the last thing I need in my house.
There's going to be room for mass-produced injection-molded parts for quite awhile. Those machines measure cycle time in seconds.Yeah... Lego has to be shitting their collective pants over this market.
