Do you recognize that the nature of employment has changed?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SammyJr

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2008
1,708
0
0
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Patranus
Originally posted by: TruePaige
I can't afford 2k a month for health insurance on myself.

A middle of the road plan from Kaiser Permente with prescription drug coverage is $89.00 per month.

Make a CHOICE: Internet or Health Coverage

You CHOOSE to not be able to afford health coverage.

The fact that your first point is blatantly false invalidates the fact that your last point is true (while your middle statement is straw man).

I bought Kaiser on my own for years. Their cheapest plans start at just under $200/mo. And those insurers whose plans start at less than $100/mo have monster deductibles.

You should have taken my advice from another thread. If you want to be believed about anything, don't cry wolf about anything. No one believes a liar, even when he's telling the truth.

But paying for $89/month for a plan with 5-10K deductable is not bad at all. You just have to ask yourself how much risk you want to bear. For most people in most situations that would save them $110/month. And a 10K deductible is not going to send many people into bankruptcy either.

Are you kidding? We have Republicans saying that the poor should give up their cell phones and cable TV for these kinds of plans. $10k WILL bankrupt someone like that, making the plan worthless and a waste of money. And if $10k won't bankrupt you, you probably have a job with benefits already.
 

imported_inspire

Senior member
Jun 29, 2006
986
0
0
Originally posted by: Infohawk
The modern service economy means people are changing jobs a lot more often than they used to. People also need to change the type of work they do more often. They can't rely on the exact same skill set for the rest of their lives. Employers need to hire and lay people off more frequently and cannot rely on having a static number of employees year after year. The downside is that there is more job instability. The upside is that we have a more efficient, dynamic economy that can respond to supply and demand more easily. Do you disagree?

With this in mind, we need to recognize that health care should not be provided by employers (I'll leave it up to you whether you think the government or the individual should be the buyer of health care.) Pensions/retirement-funding should not be employer-provided. Instead it should follow the individual. (Again, I'll leave it up to you to decide if the government should set aside a portion of your paycheck or if we should all have our own accounts.) We need to have some parity for government employees. They should not have rock-solid job security and benefits that are no longer what the average American can expect. Do you disagree?

It seems like we'd be better off if we recognized this trend and govern around it as opposed to trying to legislate that things stay the same.

I like my employer-provided health insurance, so no thanks to your idea there. If you leave / lose your job without another lined up, buy an individual policy. I've done it before and it's not that bad.

 

TruePaige

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2006
9,874
2
0
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: Patranus
Originally posted by: TruePaige
I can't afford 2k a month for health insurance on myself.

A middle of the road plan from Kaiser Permente with prescription drug coverage is $89.00 per month.

Make a CHOICE: Internet or Health Coverage

You CHOOSE to not be able to afford health coverage.

Maybe for you kids...My wife & I are in our 50's and Kaiser is about $800/mo.

A decent Blue Cross policy is almost $1000/mo, and a good policy is over $1200/mo.

When my union insurance ran out in 2004, the COBRA cost was almost $1400/mo...:shocked:

Seriously, my COBRA cost on just me was $650-700 a month when my insurance through the state ran out. I'm a young male too. 0.o

Thankfully I have some insurance now, even though I don't use it much.

I know many families who spend entire paychecks for coverage.

Those 5k deductible plans are fine, IF YOU ARE NEVER SICK. Some of you don't realize that if you have a condition that requires a hospital visit once or twice a month and a doc visit once a month that you'd be bankrupt before the first year was out. So people are forced to make the system write it off, which is worse in the long run that a government health care program.

Most uninsured are not uninsured by choice. Those "plans" you mention are complete WASTES OF MONEY and most have insane co-pay's, high deductibles, and don't even cover prescription meds. One from AETNA covers emergency room visits "up to $1000", have you ever got out of an ER for less than a $1000? No, so you get a huge bill still.
 

SammyJr

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2008
1,708
0
0
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: charrison
But paying for $89/month for a plan with 5-10K deductable is not bad at all. You just have to ask yourself how much risk you want to bear. For most people in most situations that would save them $110/month. And a 10K deductible is not going to send many people into bankruptcy either.

Yeah, but it's $89/mo for nothing more than disaster/bankruptcy insurance. Calling it health insurance is kind of a stretch.

That is exactly what insurance is. What is sold today for the most part is health care plans, not health insurance. Insurance is for the unexpected and expensive, not the inexpensive and expected.

When you get a middle man(insurance/goverment) involved in the ordinary stuff, you get a health system like we have today. Consumers dont know or care of the cost as their copay is the same and health providers have responded by making things more expensive.

To fix our health care mess, consumers have to bear more risk.

Consumers presently have all the risk they can bear.

The only risk a consumer bears right now is a copay and that is often quite inexpensive. They dont care what doctor they see or where they buy their drugs, the copay is the same. Thie consumer is blind to the actual costs of services and this has let prices rise.

Do you believe the consumer has even 1% of the knowledge to dispute what the doctor says? If the doctor were to say "You need this surgery and it costs $10k.", do you think it would change people's minds?

Consumers don't have enough knowledge to make these kinds of decisions. The free market approach you like depends on the consumer being a lot more knowledgeable. Furthermore, much of the data needed to make a decision comes in the form of expensive tests that require still more knowledge and expertise to generate.

In theory, I guess you could go to three or four different doctors and have them all run their tests like you could take your car to different mechanics, but that would be even more expensive.

Ask yourself, why is a procedure like lasik, which requires expensive equipment growing in cost at a rate less than inflation. Thats right, it is typically not covered by insurance.

For the vast majority of people, Lasiks is a vanity surgery. Glasses or contacts will do the job cheaper. That's why its not covered by most insurance. Providers also have to compete because Lasiks is never required and never time dependent, unlike so many other medical procedures and treatments.

You're comparing something needed vs. something wanted. A pure free market approach works pretty well for the latter but leads to exploitation in the former.
 

SammyJr

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2008
1,708
0
0
Originally posted by: Patranus
Heh, I find it funny how everyone here is talking as if the evil health care companies are bilking consumers out of money with "high costs". Do you know how much an MRI machine costs? Do you know how much it costs to operate an MRI machine? Do you know how much an MRI machine operator earns? You guys are acting like MRI machines grow on trees.

MRI machines cost $2,000,000 to 4,000,000 million dollars to buy and install and on top of that $800,000 per year to operate.

Yet Big Insurance makes billions in profits and their CEOs make 7 or 8 figures. That's a big part of the problem. Good health care costs money but the for-profit middle men just add insult to injury.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,768
2,544
126
I have really grave doubts on the Kaiser Permanente figures being bandied about above. I pay roughly $800 per month for my family's plan (covers 3 and all in excellent health), and it is pretty close to a diaster-only plan, having a $5000 co-pay. And that's the cheapest coverage I could find from a reputable company. (Warning-there is a lot of bogus insurance policies being sold that leave you high and dry in the event of a big loss).

Personally I think 99.9% of those posters claiming they want freedom to choose their own health plans have never bought private health insurance on their own (it's an arduous nightmare, even with a good health record) and certainly don't pay for it. If we don't get some form of universal health care this time around, I think the only rational solution is to completely eliminate the tax rules allowing employers to deduct health insurance as a business expense. Make it fully taxable, let everyone actually feel the expense of it, and the blowhards will be singing a different tune very shortly.
 

JKing106

Platinum Member
Mar 19, 2009
2,193
0
0
Originally posted by: Thump553
I have really grave doubts on the Kaiser Permanente figures being bandied about above. I pay roughly $800 per month...

That's because the figures you were given are lies, and the liars perpetrating them are sociopathic stooges. I hope none of them every become permanently disabled. Then we'll see how much they like their private insurance.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: JKing106
Originally posted by: spidey07
This is what is wrong, average, blue collar people are too poor to afford their own heatlth insurance, rent/mortgage, food, and utilities not through employers group coverage.

Fixed

Bullshit. They can afford all those an more but choose to live beyond their means.

Now wait a minute. While that's often true, it's not always true. When I was working full time my monthly premiums were 25% of my gross pay (for truly terrible coverage). When I got cut to part time my premiums were 75% of my gross pay. Tell me how a person can survive losing 75% of their gross pay to health insurance.
 

imported_inspire

Senior member
Jun 29, 2006
986
0
0
Originally posted by: Thump553
I have really grave doubts on the Kaiser Permanente figures being bandied about above. I pay roughly $800 per month for my family's plan (covers 3 and all in excellent health), and it is pretty close to a diaster-only plan, having a $5000 co-pay. And that's the cheapest coverage I could find from a reputable company. (Warning-there is a lot of bogus insurance policies being sold that leave you high and dry in the event of a big loss).

Personally I think 99.9% of those posters claiming they want freedom to choose their own health plans have never bought private health insurance on their own (it's an arduous nightmare, even with a good health record) and certainly don't pay for it. If we don't get some form of universal health care this time around, I think the only rational solution is to completely eliminate the tax rules allowing employers to deduct health insurance as a business expense. Make it fully taxable, let everyone actually feel the expense of it, and the blowhards will be singing a different tune very shortly.

Jesus - what state do you live in? $800 a month with a $5k deductible is outrageous.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: inspire
Originally posted by: Thump553
I have really grave doubts on the Kaiser Permanente figures being bandied about above. I pay roughly $800 per month for my family's plan (covers 3 and all in excellent health), and it is pretty close to a diaster-only plan, having a $5000 co-pay. And that's the cheapest coverage I could find from a reputable company. (Warning-there is a lot of bogus insurance policies being sold that leave you high and dry in the event of a big loss).

Personally I think 99.9% of those posters claiming they want freedom to choose their own health plans have never bought private health insurance on their own (it's an arduous nightmare, even with a good health record) and certainly don't pay for it. If we don't get some form of universal health care this time around, I think the only rational solution is to completely eliminate the tax rules allowing employers to deduct health insurance as a business expense. Make it fully taxable, let everyone actually feel the expense of it, and the blowhards will be singing a different tune very shortly.

Jesus - what state do you live in? $800 a month with a $5k deductible is outrageous.

That's not uncommon at all. Very few people in America get lucky enough to get in on good coverage at reasonable prices. National average annual premium costs are about $10,000 for a family. Remember, that's average, so there are a LOT of people way higher.
 

imported_inspire

Senior member
Jun 29, 2006
986
0
0
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: inspire
Originally posted by: Thump553
I have really grave doubts on the Kaiser Permanente figures being bandied about above. I pay roughly $800 per month for my family's plan (covers 3 and all in excellent health), and it is pretty close to a diaster-only plan, having a $5000 co-pay. And that's the cheapest coverage I could find from a reputable company. (Warning-there is a lot of bogus insurance policies being sold that leave you high and dry in the event of a big loss).

Personally I think 99.9% of those posters claiming they want freedom to choose their own health plans have never bought private health insurance on their own (it's an arduous nightmare, even with a good health record) and certainly don't pay for it. If we don't get some form of universal health care this time around, I think the only rational solution is to completely eliminate the tax rules allowing employers to deduct health insurance as a business expense. Make it fully taxable, let everyone actually feel the expense of it, and the blowhards will be singing a different tune very shortly.

Jesus - what state do you live in? $800 a month with a $5k deductible is outrageous.

That's not uncommon at all. Very few people in America get lucky enough to get in on good coverage at reasonable prices. National average annual premium costs are about $10,000 for a family. Remember, that's average, so there are a LOT of people way higher.

I mean - it was 5 years ago in Louisiana, but I had an individual PPO policy for my family, and my duaghter that ran me $450 a month. there were co-pays and coinsurance, but it was feasible. If I had to pay $800, I wouldn't have been able to do it - especially not with a $5k deductible. Do you have any references for that national average? I'd like to read up some more on it.

 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: inspire
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: inspire
Originally posted by: Thump553
I have really grave doubts on the Kaiser Permanente figures being bandied about above. I pay roughly $800 per month for my family's plan (covers 3 and all in excellent health), and it is pretty close to a diaster-only plan, having a $5000 co-pay. And that's the cheapest coverage I could find from a reputable company. (Warning-there is a lot of bogus insurance policies being sold that leave you high and dry in the event of a big loss).

Personally I think 99.9% of those posters claiming they want freedom to choose their own health plans have never bought private health insurance on their own (it's an arduous nightmare, even with a good health record) and certainly don't pay for it. If we don't get some form of universal health care this time around, I think the only rational solution is to completely eliminate the tax rules allowing employers to deduct health insurance as a business expense. Make it fully taxable, let everyone actually feel the expense of it, and the blowhards will be singing a different tune very shortly.

Jesus - what state do you live in? $800 a month with a $5k deductible is outrageous.

That's not uncommon at all. Very few people in America get lucky enough to get in on good coverage at reasonable prices. National average annual premium costs are about $10,000 for a family. Remember, that's average, so there are a LOT of people way higher.

I mean - it was 5 years ago in Louisiana, but I had an individual PPO policy for my family, and my duaghter that ran me $450 a month. there were co-pays and coinsurance, but it was feasible. If I had to pay $800, I wouldn't have been able to do it - especially not with a $5k deductible. Do you have any references for that national average? I'd like to read up some more on it.

There have been several in the last couple years, but as usual with contradictory data. I figure the truth is likely somewhere between the two.

Shows 10k average
Shows 6k average
 

TheSkinsFan

Golden Member
May 15, 2009
1,141
0
0
Originally posted by: TheSkinsFan
Originally posted by: Infohawk
We need to have some parity for government employees. They should not have rock-solid job security and benefits that are no longer what the average American can expect. Do you disagree?

I disagree completely. What the heck is wrong with someone having rock-solid job security and benefits?! Why would you want to take those away?

ummm, hello? <tap><tap> Is this thing on?

 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: evident


i dont know how you can make very informative and smart posts in other forums but be very shortsighted and borderline troll in P&N. have you looked up rates to get health insurance by yourself without getting help from an employer? a COBRA alone is about $700 a month for a healthy 24 yr old like me. imagine someone older w/ health probs? that $700 is rent in some areas imagine if they had a car payment, mortgage/rent and other shit they got to pay for

Because self reliance is really important to me and needs to be for every American. And it just seems people are severely misinformed when it comes to health insurance. COBRA is expensive as crap because you are used to a really, really good employer group health insurance plan with super cheap 10-15 dollar co-pays for drugs, services, etc.

You can find a similar group plan by going to a health insurance broker for much cheaper to find a plan that meets your needs, just like you do every other kind of insurance. I've provided my own health insurance many times in my life as an independent consultant. The range of covered services from employer group plans are astronomical and the prices are cheap, you don't need every single bit of that coverage depending on your situation which is why you should spend much more time picking your health insurance than clicking a box.

We've conditioned people to this model. What we really need to do is get back to the standard 80/20 plans. There are so many incentives these days that if only people took their own health and health insurance into their own hands and just simply took responsibility in it we'd (people) be in much better shape. But that's not going to happen.

 

miniMUNCH

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2000
4,159
0
0
I can't afford 2k a month for health insurance on myself.

How'd your health insurance come out to 2k a month... me and my family were like $250 a month for good PPO.

I can't help but think that a lot of people just want someone else to pay for their shit... that is what a lot of this will amount to.... 10% of population, along with businesses, paying for 90% of peoples healthcare too.

Well I want to do some things for myself thank you.

I am grateful to the wealthy/businesses who tax dollars pay for kids' schools, paved roads, etc.

But I'd like to try to carry my own weight as much as possible.

Edit:..

If you don't have health insurance but you have expensive cell phone, or a car that costs more than say a Hyundai Elantra, or a $1000 a year clothing bill, a 2000 USD computer rig, abig ole expensive TV,or eat out often, etc... you priorities are in the wrong place and that's the problem. It is not that you can't afford insurance it is that you don't want to.

If you manage your budget to a T and are frugal then I agree that you should get some help. And in a lot of cases, there is government help if you look for it (At least for your kids).
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Why do conservatives continue to spread misinformation that everyone can afford health insurance, and if they don't it's because they don't want to. It's ranging from people who are completely in denial or clueless to people who are willfully misleading, but it keeps popping up as an argument. Just because you can get $250/month for good PPO from your employer for your family, does not mean it's $250/month for everyone to obtain it in private insurance market.
 

0marTheZealot

Golden Member
Apr 5, 2004
1,692
0
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
You can find a similar group plan by going to a health insurance broker for much cheaper to find a plan that meets your needs, just like you do every other kind of insurance.


The difference between other types of insurances are that if you underestimate your risk, you only lose money. With health insurance, you may very well lose your life, or be so indebted, you'll wish you were dead.

Just a quick google showed that over half of Americans are just one medical emergency away from being bankrupt, despite having coverage. 75% of people who declared themselves bankrupt had health insurance.

http://www.delawareliberal.net...-away-from-bankruptcy/

The quote of interest:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) ? Medical bills are involved in more than 60 percent of U.S. personal bankruptcies, an increase of 50 percent in just six years, U.S. researchers reported on Thursday.

More than 75 percent of these bankrupt families had health insurance but still were overwhelmed by their medical debts, the team at Harvard Law School, Harvard Medical School and Ohio University reported in the American Journal of Medicine.

Simply put, the current system does not work. I'd rather have a working health system like that of Canada or Germany than what we currently have. On top of that, they pay less, per GDP, per capita, per every measurement you can think of, and are healthier for it. We need to completely overhaul our medical system because it flat out doesn't work. And don't give me that crap about how UHC in other countries leads to enormous wait times and that garbage. If you need the care, then you will get the treatment, it's as simple as that. Sure, you might have to wait a while for your rhinoplasty or boob jobs, but it's a lot better than our system where you can get on-demand boob jobs but people use the emergency room as a doctor's office.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
73,309
6,359
126
As time goes on and older Americans that remember what freedom is all about grow less and less in number generation after generation and younger people who are more and more used to taking it up the ass replace them, the lives of average people will decline as they are milked by those who have. Our system is based on competition which is hate and greed and generation by generation we will sink to the animal stage where all that matters is me. Little by little all the me me me types will be picked off and only I will remain. Everything will be mine.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Originally posted by: spidey07
You can find a similar group plan by going to a health insurance broker for much cheaper to find a plan that meets your needs, just like you do every other kind of insurance.


The difference between other types of insurances are that if you underestimate your risk, you only lose money. With health insurance, you may very well lose your life, or be so indebted, you'll wish you were dead.

Just a quick google showed that over half of Americans are just one medical emergency away from being bankrupt, despite having coverage. 75% of people who declared themselves bankrupt had health insurance.

http://www.delawareliberal.net...-away-from-bankruptcy/

The quote of interest:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) ? Medical bills are involved in more than 60 percent of U.S. personal bankruptcies, an increase of 50 percent in just six years, U.S. researchers reported on Thursday.

More than 75 percent of these bankrupt families had health insurance but still were overwhelmed by their medical debts, the team at Harvard Law School, Harvard Medical School and Ohio University reported in the American Journal of Medicine.

Simply put, the current system does not work. I'd rather have a working health system like that of Canada or Germany than what we currently have. On top of that, they pay less, per GDP, per capita, per every measurement you can think of, and are healthier for it. We need to completely overhaul our medical system because it flat out doesn't work. And don't give me that crap about how UHC in other countries leads to enormous wait times and that garbage. If you need the care, then you will get the treatment, it's as simple as that. Sure, you might have to wait a while for your rhinoplasty or boob jobs, but it's a lot better than our system where you can get on-demand boob jobs but people use the emergency room as a doctor's office.

SO!!!! That's what bankruptcy is for. There are already laws protecting you. This is yet again why people are too stupid to take care of themselves and look to gubment to take care of them.

People just can't take care of themselves anymore and that is a very, very sad thing.

If anything your stats prove that bankruptcy protection is working.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
73,309
6,359
126
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Originally posted by: spidey07
You can find a similar group plan by going to a health insurance broker for much cheaper to find a plan that meets your needs, just like you do every other kind of insurance.


The difference between other types of insurances are that if you underestimate your risk, you only lose money. With health insurance, you may very well lose your life, or be so indebted, you'll wish you were dead.

Just a quick google showed that over half of Americans are just one medical emergency away from being bankrupt, despite having coverage. 75% of people who declared themselves bankrupt had health insurance.

http://www.delawareliberal.net...-away-from-bankruptcy/

The quote of interest:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) ? Medical bills are involved in more than 60 percent of U.S. personal bankruptcies, an increase of 50 percent in just six years, U.S. researchers reported on Thursday.

More than 75 percent of these bankrupt families had health insurance but still were overwhelmed by their medical debts, the team at Harvard Law School, Harvard Medical School and Ohio University reported in the American Journal of Medicine.

Simply put, the current system does not work. I'd rather have a working health system like that of Canada or Germany than what we currently have. On top of that, they pay less, per GDP, per capita, per every measurement you can think of, and are healthier for it. We need to completely overhaul our medical system because it flat out doesn't work. And don't give me that crap about how UHC in other countries leads to enormous wait times and that garbage. If you need the care, then you will get the treatment, it's as simple as that. Sure, you might have to wait a while for your rhinoplasty or boob jobs, but it's a lot better than our system where you can get on-demand boob jobs but people use the emergency room as a doctor's office.

SO!!!! That's what bankruptcy is for. There are already laws protecting you. This is yet again why people are too stupid to take care of themselves and look to gubment to take care of them.

People just can't take care of themselves anymore and that is a very, very sad thing.

If anything your stats prove that bankruptcy protection is working.

Yup, sad, but at least you and me aren't those kind of worthless scum. We are people of accomplishment and substance and deserve a pat on the back. I just can't imagine where all the scum on the planet came from.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Originally posted by: spidey07
SO!!!! That's what bankruptcy is for. There are already laws protecting you. This is yet again why people are too stupid to take care of themselves and look to gubment to take care of them.

People just can't take care of themselves anymore and that is a very, very sad thing.

If anything your stats prove that bankruptcy protection is working.

This is new one... Republican answer to healthcare crisis is ... wait for it... Bankruptcy :laugh:
 

0marTheZealot

Golden Member
Apr 5, 2004
1,692
0
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Originally posted by: spidey07
You can find a similar group plan by going to a health insurance broker for much cheaper to find a plan that meets your needs, just like you do every other kind of insurance.


The difference between other types of insurances are that if you underestimate your risk, you only lose money. With health insurance, you may very well lose your life, or be so indebted, you'll wish you were dead.

Just a quick google showed that over half of Americans are just one medical emergency away from being bankrupt, despite having coverage. 75% of people who declared themselves bankrupt had health insurance.

http://www.delawareliberal.net...-away-from-bankruptcy/

The quote of interest:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) ? Medical bills are involved in more than 60 percent of U.S. personal bankruptcies, an increase of 50 percent in just six years, U.S. researchers reported on Thursday.

More than 75 percent of these bankrupt families had health insurance but still were overwhelmed by their medical debts, the team at Harvard Law School, Harvard Medical School and Ohio University reported in the American Journal of Medicine.

Simply put, the current system does not work. I'd rather have a working health system like that of Canada or Germany than what we currently have. On top of that, they pay less, per GDP, per capita, per every measurement you can think of, and are healthier for it. We need to completely overhaul our medical system because it flat out doesn't work. And don't give me that crap about how UHC in other countries leads to enormous wait times and that garbage. If you need the care, then you will get the treatment, it's as simple as that. Sure, you might have to wait a while for your rhinoplasty or boob jobs, but it's a lot better than our system where you can get on-demand boob jobs but people use the emergency room as a doctor's office.

SO!!!! That's what bankruptcy is for. There are already laws protecting you. This is yet again why people are too stupid to take care of themselves and look to gubment to take care of them.

People just can't take care of themselves anymore and that is a very, very sad thing.

If anything your stats prove that bankruptcy protection is working.

So, you're saying that if you get a MRSA infection because you got a splinter on your friend's deck, you had it coming because you didn't take care of yourself?
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: SammyJr

Do you believe the consumer has even 1% of the knowledge to dispute what the doctor says? If the doctor were to say "You need this surgery and it costs $10k.", do you think it would change people's minds?

Consumers don't have enough knowledge to make these kinds of decisions. The free market approach you like depends on the consumer being a lot more knowledgeable. Furthermore, much of the data needed to make a decision comes in the form of expensive tests that require still more knowledge and expertise to generate.

In theory, I guess you could go to three or four different doctors and have them all run their tests like you could take your car to different mechanics, but that would be even more expensive.

Both consumers and doctors act differently when they know finances are limited. IF both parties know someone else is footing the bill, neither will hesitate to run a test, just to be sure.
BUt this is not just about tests, it is about simple things like office visits and meds as well.


Ask yourself, why is a procedure like lasik, which requires expensive equipment growing in cost at a rate less than inflation. Thats right, it is typically not covered by insurance.

For the vast majority of people, Lasiks is a vanity surgery. Glasses or contacts will do the job cheaper. That's why its not covered by most insurance. Providers also have to compete because Lasiks is never required and never time dependent, unlike so many other medical procedures and treatments.

You're comparing something needed vs. something wanted. A pure free market approach works pretty well for the latter but leads to exploitation in the former.
But at you agree the free market works and the free market has been removed from health care for the most part. Part of the fix needs for the health care problem will be letting the free market back in. OUR regulations on healthcare have really distorted the health care market.

look at what safeway has done to control cost. Personal responsibility and market forces do work.