Do you look at other people's post counts?

[CrackRabbit]

Only when I am about to roast some clueless n00b.

 

[nakedfrog]

Originally posted by: K1052

Originally posted by: AgaBoogaBoo
I look at post counts because I love how large some of them are.

Everyone looks at other people's e-penises in the shower, it's natural...

But some look more closely than others...

 

[K1052]

Originally posted by: nakedfrog

Originally posted by: K1052

Originally posted by: AgaBoogaBoo
I look at post counts because I love how large some of them are.

Everyone looks at other people's e-penises in the shower, it's natural...

But some look more closely than others...

Yours is bigger than mine

 

[potato28]

Originally posted by: RossMAN
Never.

:laugh:

 

[nakedfrog]

Originally posted by: K1052

Originally posted by: nakedfrog

Originally posted by: K1052

Originally posted by: AgaBoogaBoo
I look at post counts because I love how large some of them are.

Everyone looks at other people's e-penises in the shower, it's natural...

But some look more closely than others...

Yours is bigger than mine

Careful cultivation is key.

 

[oznerol]

I find a user's join date is a far more useful statistic than their post count.

 

[slackwarelinux]

I look at the post count and the join date and do a quick mental calculation of posts per day. If their posts per day count too high, and the poster joined recently, I tend to weigh their opinions less.

Some other modifiers are the avatar, and signatures.

Lurking is a science.

 

[imported_LoKe]

Originally posted by: ducci
I find a user's join date is a far more useful statistic than their post count.

Damn it.

 

[StinkyPinky]

Originally posted by: ducci
I find a user's join date is a far more useful statistic than their post count.

I hear you man. It means we choose our words carefully.

 

[Scouzer]

If the join date is more important, then I'm very important.

 

[fleabag]

Originally posted by: moshquerade
i had 34567 going on not too long ago.

I remember when you were only around 5K posts..

 

[nakedfrog]

Originally posted by: slackwarelinux
I look at the post count and the join date and do a quick mental calculation of posts per day. If their posts per day count too high, and the poster joined recently, I tend to weigh their opinions less.

Some other modifiers are the avatar, and signatures.

Lurking is a science.

It's overrated. I tried that for a couple years.

 

[lokiju]

Now he can never post again!

 

[Leros]

Originally posted by: bigrash
If so you should look at mine

We can make fun of you and you can't retaliate without messing up your post count.

 

[slackwarelinux]

Originally posted by: nakedfrog

Originally posted by: slackwarelinux
I look at the post count and the join date and do a quick mental calculation of posts per day. If their posts per day count too high, and the poster joined recently, I tend to weigh their opinions less.

Some other modifiers are the avatar, and signatures.

Lurking is a science.

It's overrated. I tried that for a couple years.

I'd retort, but that would increase my post count. At any rate, analysis of your post count, avatar, join date, and profile indicate that you are probably right.

 

[YOyoYOhowsDAjello]

Originally posted by: slackwarelinux
I look at the post count and the join date and do a quick mental calculation of posts per day. If their posts per day count too high, and the poster joined recently, I tend to weigh their opinions less.

Some other modifiers are the avatar, and signatures.

Lurking is a science.

How does the avatar factor in? (other than "africanamerican")

 

[KeithTalent]

Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello

Originally posted by: slackwarelinux
I look at the post count and the join date and do a quick mental calculation of posts per day. If their posts per day count too high, and the poster joined recently, I tend to weigh their opinions less.

Some other modifiers are the avatar, and signatures.

Lurking is a science.

How does the avatar factor in? (other than "africanamerican")

All of the posters using the 'blindfold' avatar are assholes.

KT

 

[Ruptga]

*looks at own postcount*

Whoa, what a coincidence

 

[DrPizza]

Originally posted by: fleabag

Originally posted by: moshquerade
i had 34567 going on not too long ago.

I remember when you were only around 5K posts..

fleabag
Member
Posts: 42
Joined: 10/01/2007

So, you were a lurker here for 5 years?


I almost made a thread once, titled "this is the oddest prime post I've ever made." The smallest prime number that used each of the odd digits.