Pliablemoose
Lifer
That sounds like a lot of work...
In the dystopian future reality I live in, it's a quiet day. The zombies really suck, I just use my MBA as an ax to cut off their heads.
That sounds like a lot of work...
Exactly. Mobile phones and Music players are some of the tech markets I was talking about. Apple sets the trend for:
Laptop Aesthetics
Operating systems layout
Tablets
Phones
Music Players
Mini Desktop design.
But as I said, overall Apple aren't that significant overall and those things you listed are why.
Laptop aesthetics and Mini Desktop design - really, who cares?
Apple copied the design for the iPhone from LG with the LG Prada and the iPad is essentially the same thing but larger.
iPhone officially announced Jan 9, 2007. LG Prada officially announced Jan 18, 2007. LG Prada may have been leaked earlier but it doesn't mean it was designed/developed/created before the iPhone. There are no patents that prove it and no lawsuits by LG. The Prada also did not have the eco-system that the iPhone had(apps, itunes store, etc).
The fact that pictures appeared before iPhone and that it was released before the iPhone was is about as much proof that you need.
LOL!!! Yes, b/c the iPhone was developed in only a couple of months after the LG picture. More like Apple was more secretive about their product.
If that's all the proof you need, you are truly ignorant and a troll.
But as I said, overall Apple aren't that significant overall and those things you listed are why.
Laptop aesthetics and Mini Desktop design - really, who cares?
Apple copied the design for the iPhone from LG with the LG Prada and the iPad is essentially the same thing but larger.
People who buy laptops and mini desktops, and the companies that make them.
If you don't think that something being leaked and released before another product isn't proof of it being released/designed/created first then I don't know what else there is to say.
Which, once again, is a small fragment overall.
Ok I think you must be joking now, I'd you think that people who buy laptops, tablets, mobile phones and music players are a small fragment of the overall tech market then you are delusional.
Apples marketshare of the laptop market really isn't very big at all and tablets have yet to make a huge impact.
Apple's mobile phones and music players are limited to rich people with disposable incomes.
Apples marketshare of the laptop market really isn't very big at all and tablets have yet to make a huge impact.
Apple's mobile phones and music players are limited to rich people with disposable incomes.
There's been 275 million ipods sold.
Over 100 million iphones sold.
30 million ipads to date.
Apple sold almost 3 million laptops in Q1'11
Those aren't chump numbers for a single device manufacturer. And especially not chump numbers when you consider the upscale market they reside in. Apple accounts for something like 90% of all personal computers sold over $1000.
How many laptops overall were sold in Q1'11?
How many personal computers over $1000 are sold vs personal computers under $1000?
Numbers sold are only part of the equation. There isn't a tech company out there that wouldn't trade financial positions with Apple. Most companies would gladly sell 1 device at a $10 profit than try to move 10 at $1 if they could.
And "just" phones? Smart phones are essentially portable, pocket sized computers at this point. There isn't hardly a person in a 1st world country that doesn't have one. And the smart phone industry is rapidly growing as speeds and device functionality starts to blur the gap between conventional portable devices.
Which goes back to my point about Apple's market being limited to rich people with disposable income.
Apples marketshare of the laptop market really isn't very big at all
and tablets have yet to make a huge impact.
Apple's mobile phones and music players are limited to rich people with disposable incomes.
Which isn't actually true at all. 15 years ago a decent computer ran you easily $1500-$2500. And normal households saved up for them and bought them. The cutthroat pricing and $300 computers and laptops is a recent phenomenon. $1000 for a computer is still "cheap" compared to what people used to pay for them. It's not an elite market because that's still half what a Packard Bell cost you in 1994.
Stupid or trolling. Tablets are making a huge impact on comparable tech, like netbooks
Yeah you're right, it's not like they have the biggest selling smart phone or the biggest selling music player on the planet have they? 🙄
So 91.5% of the laptops sold in the world are not Apple laptops then.
The smartphone and fancy music player market is limited to people in the rich world with disposable income.