• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Do you get better Vmem performance if you have 2 blocks on different physical disks? (Win2000)

N

Noriaki

Lifer
In Win2k you can set Virtual Memory blocks by disk right.

Well I have 2 IBM 75GXPs
If I put 256MB Vmem on each instead of 512MB on the 2nd one (1st one has OS and apps) would that performance better?
 
I have the same concern as you. I have four drives total and I put a 100mb swap file on three and 250mb on the fourth. I think its faster but not totally sure. In theory, my reasoning was, since win2k randomly writes to the fastest swap files it sees, than having more swap files across more drives is faster. I think you gain alot in write speed but you might lose some in access times if you run alot of drives like mine. Anyone in the know on swap file and win2k?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top