Do you consider this as a "chick car"?

[Tret]

Click Here

 

[hdeck]

no.

 

[Mr N8]

No. Maybe family car.

 

[Jzero]

If it's a chick car, I don't mind being a chick.

 

[Ryan]

Hell no

 

[conjur]

Heck no. Esp. with the V6. That thing's sweet. Although, I quit my job selling Honda's a month before they got their first 6-speed in. Wish I could have driven that!

 

[RaiseUp]

Get a BMW 745li!

 

[LakAttack]

Not a chick car, although I hate what they did to the rear with this model.

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: LakAttack
Not a chick car, although I hate what they did to the rear with this model.

Why? Looks much the same as a Mercedes.

 

[MainFramed]

no, but i wouldnt drive it

 

[gistech1978]

i would drive it.
im not a chick
but this coming from a guy who has driven a 1976 olds cutlass, 1988 buick skylark and a 1992 olds cutlass supreme.
but they were all free hand-me-down cars, so im not going to complain.

 

[Jzero]

Originally posted by: gistech1978
i would drive it.
im not a chick
but this coming from a guy who has driven a 1976 olds cutlass, 1988 buick skylark and a 1992 olds cutlass supreme.
but they were all free hand-me-down cars, so im not going to complain.

If anyone considers the Cutlass a "chick car," the need their head examined.

 

[KokomoGST]

no but it's more of a poseur's car... esp if you add wing and get it in red or yellow or add body kit.

mebbe it's just I know too many people with accord coupes that claim they are fast and can't even beat my puny 14 second car.

 

[Spooner]

This car's pretty shweet actually.

what's the MSRP?

 

[Pastfinder]

Nah, but its kinda fugly

 

[Vic]

I have to ask - am I the only who thinks the 03 and newer Accord is just butt-ass fugly? I hate seeing one on the road... just this ugly egg-shaped thing...

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: Spooner
This car's pretty shweet actually.

what's the MSRP?

LX

Starting At $19,400




EX

Starting At $21,800




LX V-6

Starting At $23,400




EX with Leather

Starting At $23,600




EX with Leather and Honda Satellite-Linked Navigation System?

Starting At $25,600




EX V-6

Starting At $26,500




There's a link on that page to build your own or you could go to http://www.edmunds.com and check out the MSRP

 

[Barnaby W. Füi]

Originally posted by: Vic
I have to ask - am I the only who thinks the 03 and newer Accord is just butt-ass fugly? I hate seeing one on the road... just this ugly egg-shaped thing...

Yeah, it's ugly as hell. Almost looks like some perverse mixture of a cavalier, an older intrepid (the way the back angles upwards), and some random honda.

 

[WinkOsmosis]

Nah it's not a chick car. With the I4 and auto it is though. But why would you get the V6 and manual? Might as well get a sports car.

 

[deerslayer]

no

 

[gistech1978]

Originally posted by: Jzero

Originally posted by: gistech1978
i would drive it.
im not a chick
but this coming from a guy who has driven a 1976 olds cutlass, 1988 buick skylark and a 1992 olds cutlass supreme.
but they were all free hand-me-down cars, so im not going to complain.

If anyone considers the Cutlass a "chick car," the need their head examined.

well im just saying im not picky about the cars i drive
so i would drive that thing at the drop of a hat.
that 76 would get moving when it had to, it wasnt a chick car.
but it didnt get very many chicks either.

 

[new2AMD]

Not my style but I could see dudes drivin it.

 

[lozina]

I liked the previous model's body alot more, but it's still a great vehicle- not a chicks car! A dodge neon or volkswagen beetle is a chicks car!

 

[StageLeft]

Not really...well, if you get the 6 cylinder with an auto then it's a chick car, but that goes without saying.

 

[iamwiz82]

i'd argue more for lemming than chick