purbeast0
No Lifer
- Sep 13, 2001
- 53,664
- 6,547
- 126
The tax won't hurt you in moderation.
fat tax wuold hurt less than sugar tax.
The tax won't hurt you in moderation.
Um, nope.While HFCS is like a intravenous injection of sugar, the real problem is our countries attitude towards carbs. See its perfectly OK for something to have 80+ carbs and over a thousand calories, but be called "low - fat" and healthy. However you are much better off eating something that has 20g of fat and 30 carbs for those same calories. The trouble is that carbs do not signal your brain that you are full - so you'll keep eating, while if you ingest fat, your body will respond and you won't keep chowing. Ever notice how much pasta you can eat? But there is an upper limit on the amount of steak?
Just stop subsidizing agribusiness, so the price of HFCS will go up.
What if it was <insert your favorite food/drink/activity>?Go for it. I rarely eat this shit so I'm all for it.
I think states and towns should be able to tax whatever their residents want to tax.
What if it was <insert your favorite food/drink/activity>?
Do you really think this is anything more than a feel good legislation money grab?
This is not a money grab. Sugar consumption is causing type 2 diabetes and MANY more illnesses. Diabetes is the most expensive illness to treat, and the idiots who are eating themselves into diabetes don't pay the full cost of their treatment. So, it's left to tax payers and healthy insurance premium payers to pay for their stupidity.
I drink tea because it improves health instead of radically degrading it. I shouldn't have to pay for the stupid decisions made by sugar guzzlers. Tax sugar and put that money towards treating diabetes and anti sugar ad campaigns. The higher prices will also push down consumption.
Well then we should start communicating this from a young age. Instead of promoting a food pyramid or food plate that's full of sugar maybe they should start telling the truth?
IMO the feds created this problem by subsidizing corn and telling people they should eat 10 servings of carbs(sugar) per day. Now they want us to pay to clean up the mess. GTFO is what I say.
(1) Our roads are in poor repair
(2) Excercise is also a key component of good health; and has proven positive effects on Diabetes.
(3) Public scrutiny is also a proven method to modify behavior.
(4) Obesity is a health risk, and also a key indicator that said individuals are consuming far more resource than should be allocated.
Therefore
Solution: Put fat people in day glow orange suits and put them on chain gangs performing community service repairing our country's infrastructure. Then confiscate their earnings, savings, and all property/title so these scum may no longer have the means to stuff their hideous, misshapen maws with coissants and Haagen Dazs.
Lets tax fries. Would america starve if fries were illegal?
How did star trek stop obesity?
Hell no. Let Darwin sort through the population after treating type 2 diabetes becomes a 100% personal expense.
Exactly. No sugar tax and make them, type 2 diabetics, pay for their own treatment, 100%. They will reform, pay, or die.Where does the money for treatment come from? Have you seen the demographics of patients with diabetes? They don't pay for their health insurance, you do (under the premise that you, like all ATOT members, make 100K+ a year).
There are thousands of activities that have negative effects and this logic is fail.Sugar consumption is causing type 2 diabetes and MANY more illnesses.

Exactly. No sugar tax and make them, type 2 diabetics, pay for their own treatment, 100%. They will reform, pay, or die.
Sugar consumption is causing type 2 diabetes and MANY more illnesses.
True. So add a % body fat/cardio health fitness component.Sure the diabetes epidemic in this country is cause by shitty lifestyles but some people are screwed by genetics and develop it despite not being sedentary gluttons.
The majority of individuals with type 2 diabetes were overweight, did not engage in recommended levels of physical activity, and did not follow dietary guidelines for fat and fruit and vegetable consumption. Additional measures are needed to encourage regular physical activity and improve dietary habits in this population.
