dig out last years consumer reports tests. ionic breeze is dead last. it spits out toxic ozone to boot.
There are probably a dozen threads on air filters/purifiers and the Ionic Breeze specifically in the archives.
But you are being too nice. Consumer Reports said the Ionic Breeze Quadra had the worst performance of any air filtration product they have
ever tested in the 10+ years CR has been testing household air cleaner/purifier products.
The Friedrich C-90A has earned top honors in CRs tests many times, though its filtration mechanism is primarily electrostatic, it combines a mechanical 'pre-filter' for larger particles, and an activated charcoal filter for odors/VOCs.
A good electrostatic cleaner like the C-90A can be a very good air cleaner with high efficiency, but the electrostatic plates
must be kept clean because its filtration efficiency rapidly declines as the plates become saturated with dirt/dust/particles. Electrostatic products are high maintenance for this reason, it must be kept substantially clean to do its job.
As good as electrostatic filters can be, none compare with HEPA in terms of filtration efficiency and low maintenance. The filtration efficiency of HEPA filters actually
increase as the filter becomes dirty, until the filter is so saturated that air can no longer pass through at reasonable rates.
So why has the C-90A consistently taken top honors over all tested HEPA filters?
Because the testing methods used by CR do not test the products long enough to bring-out the weakness of electrostatic products nor the strengths of HEPA products.
CR Labs fills a sealed chamber of known volume with contaminants of a known concentration. They then test to see how long it takes each product to 'clear' the air to a specified level of clearance measured by, among other devices, a spectrometer. The time it takes for each product to achieve the same level of room clearance is the 'clearance rate'.
Because HEPA uses a mechanical filtration matrix, air flow through HEPA is obstructed as it must find its way through the microchannels of the matrix. An electrostatic mechanism is relatively unobstructed and can achieve higher exchange/flow rates, thus clearing the room 'faster', not necessarily 'more'.
The room clearance test only takes a couple hours for the best cleaners, yet air cleaners will not be used in your home for just a couple hours then boxed-up forever. It will have to exchange the air in the room hundreds or thousands of times, over the course of months or years. CR Labs also doesn't take maintenance into account as weighing for or against any product.
There is a lot of misrepresentation in the marketing of air purifiers (surprise). Some companies pushing electrostatic cleaners, including Friedrich, claim that HEPA cannot filter particles smaller than .3 micron. This is false. HEPA
by definition is able to achieve a
minimum 99.97% filtration efficiency @ .3 microns. Companies pushing competing products have interpreted this to mean that HEPA efficiency declines as particles smaller than .3 microns are encountered, when in fact the opposite is actually true.
A combination of principles and mechanisms are at work in a HEPA filter (or any mechanical filter); straining/seiving, inertial impaction, interception by Van der Waals forces, and diffusion by Brownian Motion are the main principles/actions.
Particles are influenced (and captured) through one or more of these principles depending on their size, density, velocity, and ionization state. There is an overlap between most of these principles where a particle may be equally influenced by more than one principle.
By some arbitrary feat of physics, there is a median particle size which does not readily lend itself to influence by any of these mechanisms or principles and thus is the most difficult to capture. That median particle size is .3 microns, or roughly between .25 and .35 microns.
If you want to built the most effective filter known to man, you find the most difficult particle to capture, then build a filter whose definitive performance standard is to capture that median particle size.
The 99.97% filtration efficiency of a HEPA filter at .3 microns (mil-spec DOP/HEPA test) is THE WORST CASE SCENARIO because .3 microns is the most difficult particle size to capture for any mechanical filter. Particles both larger and smaller than .3 microns are filtered at a virtual 100% efficiency because they readily lend themselves to influence by one or more of the aforementioned principles.
HEPA filters remain effective until you approach the particle size of VOCs, or around .001 microns. No mechanical or electrostatic filter is effective at these extremely small sub-micron sizes and chemical means must be employed.