Do democrats have a shot in '04?

[aircooled]

Will Edwards be the next Clinton? or will Bush take another term?

 

[aswedc]

this definately belongs in politics

 

[FoBoT]

political forum has probably never thought of this topic, see what they think

 

[Conky]

I hope Al Sharpton gets the nod.

 

[OREOSpeedwagon]

This belongs in the politics forum but yes I do think democrats have a chance in 04.

 

[aircooled]

Originally posted by: aswedc
this definately belongs in politics

I know, but I was looking for the ATOT opinion..

 

[Pilsnerpete]

After this fantastic war, all televised with Geraldo? No way. I'd rather have a pres that prays vs. a pres that says, "That depends on your definition of sex."

 

[spaceman]

the Sharpton/Jackson ticket.

 

[Anubis]

dont think so. we are gonna get stuck with 4 more years a dubba

 

[spaceman]

Originally posted by: TheEvil1
dont think so. we are gonna get stuck with 4 more years a dubba

cool.

 

[aircooled]

Originally posted by: ncircle
the Sharpton/Jackson ticket.

I'm practicing my chad punchin' as we speak

 

[Zebo]

No chance aircooled. The message will continue to be fear; "it's terror, not the enonomy stupid" And most all think Republicans are better suited to deal with outside threats than Dems.

 

[spaceman]

Originally posted by: Carbonyl
No chance aircooled. The message will continue to be fear; "it's terror, not the enonomy stupid" And most all think Republicans are better suited to deal with outside threats than Dems.

Bush has a pretty sturdy track record.
but Clinton, boy he was REAL hard on those terrorists during his admin..

Bush doesnt screw around, and for that he will get my vote in 2k4(again)

 

[Spac3d]

All I know is that I will vote AGAINST Bush in 2k4. A Democrat will do fine if it gets that damn monkey out of office.

 

[BatmanNate]

Originally posted by: Carbonyl
No chance aircooled. The message will continue to be fear; "it's terror, not the enonomy stupid" And most all think Republicans are better suited to deal with outside threats than Dems.

There is some truth to the second part of your statement, if by better suited to deal with outside threats you mean better suited to create them. :beer:

 

[NakaNaka]

Yeah, terrorism, big deal. I was right there at the WTC and I still believe we are at no more and no less a risk than before. The only reason we haven't been hit is because the terrorists don't want to hit us. Do you know how easy it would be for a couple guys to pick up some automatic weapons or pull a Ted Kaczynski and go into Grand Central station in NYC. 2 or 3 guys, hit different parts, people would be going nuts. Why haven't they done it?

On the other hand, our economy is going down the drain. My stock market account and the accounts of millions of Americans are going down the shute. EBAY is my only savior (Has tripled in 2 yrs) ... Unemployment is high. That matters to me a great deal and that is why a Dem will get my vote in 2004.

 

[TheNinja]

I would sooner vote for dog feces than vote for a democrat.

 

[her209]

Sing for the moment.

 

[NakaNaka]

Originally posted by: Staley8
I would sooner vote for dog feces than vote for a democrat.

Your entitled to your opinion, despite how pathetically you put it. Now back that statement up, intelligently.

 

[ultimatebob]

There are only two ways the Democrats could beat Bush in 2004:

1) The economy goes into a deep recession, and the Democrats find a good way of blaming in on Bush.

2) Bush gets involved in a scandal of Watergate perportions, which leads to a major congressional investigation.

 

[TheNinja]

Originally posted by: NakaNaka

Originally posted by: Staley8
I would sooner vote for dog feces than vote for a democrat.

Your entitled to your opinion, despite how pathetically you put it. Now back that statement up, intelligently.

Actually I just don't like the fact the democrats tend to make everything the governments problem. Democrats tend to want the government to make programs to take care of them, they want the government to give them their due, they want the goverment to pay the health care and take care of their kids, but they want lower taxes. I have other reasons too but that is the general idea behind it.

 

[her209]

Originally posted by: Staley8

Originally posted by: NakaNaka

Originally posted by: Staley8
I would sooner vote for dog feces than vote for a democrat.

Your entitled to your opinion, despite how pathetically you put it. Now back that statement up, intelligently.

Actually I just don't like the fact the democrats tend to make everything the governments problem. Democrats tend to want the government to make programs to take care of them, they want the government to give them their due, they want the goverment to pay the health care and take care of their kids, but they want lower taxes. I have other reasons too but that is the general idea behind it.

I guess you haven't been paying to attention to Bush's huge tax cut.

EDIT: Oh I forgot you are too busy stealing other people's property.

 

[Pilsnerpete]

read my lips. no huge tax increase.

 

[ScottyB]

Originally posted by: ultimatebob
There are only two ways the Democrats could beat Bush in 2004:

1) The economy goes into a deep recession, and the Democrats find a good way of blaming in on Bush.

2) Bush gets involved in a scandal of Watergate perportions, which leads to a major congressional investigation.

We can only hope number 2 comes true.

 

[SilverThief]

God I hope not.
Worthless asstards.