• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Do Bushies ever stop digging?

Apologies for the source . . . some times you just have to stare into the evil . . .
"I'm going to support this $25 billion, but we're going to put limitations on it because we're sworn to protect the people's money," said Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., who waved a copy of the Constitution (search) at the witness table.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA . . . damn even the Klan is telling jokes these days.

Wolfowitz's acknowledgment that the war price tag would exceed $50 billion for the budget year that starts Oct. 1 edged the administration toward critics' estimates of closer to $75 billion. White House budget chief Joshua Bolten (search) earlier this year said the "upper limit" of next year's war spending might be $50 billion.
Technically Bolton is telling the truth. Bush will spend the $25B this year and then another $50B next year.

Bush's war request excludes $1 billion that Marc Grossman, undersecretary of state for political affairs, told the House International Relations Committee will be needed next year to staff a U.S. embassy in Baghdad.

That excludes construction of an embassy, which under some scenarios would cost another $1 billion.
Here's my question. Do we really need to spend $1B on an Iraqi embassy? Judging from current events I think we need to spend that money on development projects in West Virginia.
 
$1B does seem like a staggering amount of money for an embassy. I am not a contractor, but I find it hard to envision that kind of expense being justified, regardless of the fact that this will obviously have to be a highly secure facility.
 
Didn't the Ronald Reagan building cost $250,000,000?

And that is without the bullet-resistant windows, blast walls, underground bunker and $200,000/yr salaries these civilian contractors in Iraq are paid.
 
Originally posted by: klah
Didn't the Ronald Reagan building cost $250,000,000?

And that is without the bullet-resistant windows, blast walls, underground bunker and $200,000/yr salaries these civilian contractors in Iraq are paid.


$200k * 5000 = 1 billion

Are their going to be those many workers? Those gigantic arenas cost $400 million. This is crazy.
 
Back
Top