• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

DNC Threatens Press Freedom by Going After Wikileaks

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Blackjack200 said:
LMAO, when the 2016 primaries began Sanders was totally unknown. Please go find me that last poll where he wasn't the country's most popular senator.

Does it burn you up inside to know that Sanders would have beat Trump in the GE?
Click to expand...

Uh he announced in May of 2015 one month after Clinton.

He also got more favorable coverage and was drowned out by media covering the republican race. Clinton received the most negative coverage of all candidates. So not only did your horse get beat by a horse with a broken leg, that broken horse still got more votes, despite the negative coverage and despite having a hostile foreign nation running against her.

https://www.boston.com/news/politic...irms-refutes-bernie-sanderss-complaints-media

And you continue to parrot Russian propaganda. What a truly useful idiot you are!
 
Vic said:
How could Bernie have beaten Trump in the general election when he couldn't beat Hillary in the primaries?
Click to expand...

As @Victorian Gray pointed out before accidentally deleting most of his post, there’s an obscure technicality that many people don’t know about where Democratic Party primary voters are not the same group of people as general election voters.

Sanders himself pointed out that he fared much better against the real estate mogul than Clinton, telling NBC during an interview in spring 2016 that “right now, in every major poll, national poll and statewide poll done in the last month, six weeks, we are defeating Trump, often by big numbers and always at a larger margin than Secretary Clinton is.”


https://www.newsweek.com/bernie-sanders-wouldve-defeated-trump-2016-says-senators-wife-1240834

If Clinton supporters had voted strategically, they would have nominated Sanders instead of Clinton, but I guess they’re purists and preferred Trump.
 
Guru said:
Look the USA was caught wiretapping all of its allies phones and listening in on private phone calls, Angela Merkels personal phones were monitored. So lets not pretend as if these things don't happen all the time by all countries with the ability to do so.

Facts remain that that attack that the Dutch revealed was on the state department in 2014.

Again NO ONE FORCED the DNC and Hillary Clinton to subvert US elections and cheat Bernie Sanders, if they chose to compete fairly there would be no issue. All of the Wikileaks information is 100% true and in the public interest.

Again China is hacking the USA all the time, 24/7, so is Israel, etc... What has that to do with Donald Trump? Facts are people elected Donald Trump because he was anti war, unlike the bitch Hillary Clinton and he was anti SJW PC idiocy, which the people were sick and tired off. That is why people elected a HUGE majority of republicans. Republicans won counties, cities, states, governorships, the congress, senate and presidency! It was a COMPLETE victory for the republicans.

Who cares what Russia, China, Israel, Japan, Germany, Britain, etc... do? It was a massive turnout for republicans in 2016, winning everything that year. Even today after 2 years of Trump, the democrats still can't catch up. Republicans lead in the state governorships and houses, barely lost congress and still have the senate and presidency.

Maybe democrats should look in the mirror and realize they are not offering what the people want and that is a focus on jobs, focus on salary, focus on standard of living and putting Americans first, NOT immigrants.
Click to expand...

LiveLeak-dot-com-so-much-cocaine----547870_1545871929.gif



Hilarious. Look at you run, and to mimicking Trump's butthurt fixation on the election no less. Haha!

Whataboutism + who cares + strawmen + not even trying to address the points provided. You are every bit the moron you illustrate yourself as, bravo.

2/10 for the comedy of you repeatedly using the term "fact" though, and for the mirror comment. Ignorance, and first rate projection, perhaps the only things I've seen you show any proficiency with here. Sure as hell ain't supporting your wacky revisionist history. Try consuming less talk radio, you might find your "arguments" producing less disgusted laughter.
 
Last edited:
Blackjack200 said:
As @Victorian Gray pointed out before accidentally deleting most of his post, there’s an obscure technicality that many people don’t know about where Democratic Party primary voters are not the same group of people as general election voters.

Sanders himself pointed out that he fared much better against the real estate mogul than Clinton, telling NBC during an interview in spring 2016 that “right now, in every major poll, national poll and statewide poll done in the last month, six weeks, we are defeating Trump, often by big numbers and always at a larger margin than Secretary Clinton is.”


https://www.newsweek.com/bernie-sanders-wouldve-defeated-trump-2016-says-senators-wife-1240834

If Clinton supporters had voted strategically, they would have nominated Sanders instead of Clinton, but I guess they’re purists and preferred Trump.
Click to expand...
That's common knowledge, not an obscure technicality. My question still stands, how was Bernie going to beat Trump in the general election when he couldn't beat a poor campaigner like Hillary in the primaries?
 
Last edited:
Blackjack200 said:
As @Victorian Gray pointed out before accidentally deleting most of his post, there’s an obscure technicality that many people don’t know about where Democratic Party primary voters are not the same group of people as general election voters.

Sanders himself pointed out that he fared much better against the real estate mogul than Clinton, telling NBC during an interview in spring 2016 that “right now, in every major poll, national poll and statewide poll done in the last month, six weeks, we are defeating Trump, often by big numbers and always at a larger margin than Secretary Clinton is.”

https://www.newsweek.com/bernie-sanders-wouldve-defeated-trump-2016-says-senators-wife-1240834

If Clinton supporters had voted strategically, they would have nominated Sanders instead of Clinton, but I guess they’re purists and preferred Trump.
Click to expand...

Oops, you forgot that Bernie lost most of the open primaries as well (12 out if 21). Boy are you one forgetful fuck!
 
Polls in spring 2016 also showed Hillary beating Trump. If those were wrong, then why would we assume that Bernie's polling was correct?

The reality is that the Trump campaign was well prepared for either candidate.
Hillary got the nom, so they played the split and disillusion the Dems with the Bernie got cheated card, which sadly is still playing out.
But if Bernie had won the nom, then the Trump campaign would ramped up the OMG leftist extremists socialists war on cops antifa BLM riots on college campuses and in the streets rhetoric to full volume, while Trump quietly moved to the middle and pandered to the moderate voters who weren't ever going to vote for a socialist who used to buddy with Fidel.

Meanwhile, the "fake news" mainstream media that supposedly hates Trump would have still pumped out newscycle after newscycle of positive coverage for him while either ignoring Bernie or fretting over Hillary's emails.

The most truthful thing Trump said during the campaign was that the election was rigged. Our mistake was assuming that he meant it was rigged against him.
 
Last edited:
ivwshane said:
Oops, you forgot that Bernie lost most of the open primaries as well (12 out if 21). Boy are you one forgetful fuck!
Click to expand...

Well, the only reason our govt is persecuting poor Julian is because of Crooked Hillary, the Deep State & Stupid Democrats who cheated poor Bernie out of their only chance to beat Trump. Or something.
 
Vic said:
That's common knowledge, not an obscure technicality. My question still stands, how was Bernie going to beat Trump in the general election when he couldn't beat a poor campaigner like Hillary in the primaries?
Click to expand...

Because more people would have voted for him than voted for Clinton.
 
ivwshane said:
Oops, you forgot that Bernie lost most of the open primaries as well (12 out if 21). Boy are you one forgetful fuck!
Click to expand...

Sanders beat Clinton in the open primaries in Michigan and Wisonsin, the only two swing states that went against her and had open primaries. Keep digging bitch.
 
Blackjack200 said:
Sanders beat Clinton in the open primaries in Michigan and Wisonsin, the only two swing states that went against her and had open primaries. Keep digging bitch.
Click to expand...

Sure and he would have gotten the black and minority vote, how exactly?

If I keep digging I'll eventually reach your dumb ass.
 
Last edited:
ivwshane said:
Sure and he would have gotten the black and minority vote, how exactly?
Click to expand...

Oops.
https://twitter.com/x/status/1078043620501057536

Nothing dumb ass white people love doing more than trying to speak for black people and shitting their pants in the process.

If I keep digging I'll eventually each your dumb ass.
Click to expand...

You’ll have to get through a rather large pile of horny and erect men if you want a chance at my ass. Not sure if that will discourage you or only make the challenge even more exciting.
 
Blackjack200 said:
Oops.
https://twitter.com/x/status/1078043620501057536

Nothing dumb ass white people love doing more than trying to speak for black people and shitting their pants in the process.



You’ll have to get through a rather large pile of horny and erect men if you want a chance at my ass. Not sure if that will discourage you or only make the challenge even more exciting.
Click to expand...

LOL! Did this fucking idiot post a poll from within the last week? As in not one from the 2016 election?

Good job moron! So now Bernie has a good chunk of the black vote (still less than Clinton did) and now white people don't want to vote for him! Lol

You really are a trumptard with a different God!
 
Actually I’m gonna have to eat my words there 😀

No shite the tweet says 2018. The poll was taken from the 11th to the 16th it seems. I was reading it as taken in 2016 but the dude was tweeting about it recently.

But are you thinking blacks have significantly changed their opinion from one way or the other toward Bernie in the last two years? What would he have done since being a presidential candidate to change their levels of excitement?



Edit: and honestly I think constantly posting profanity laced post hurling insults speaks volumes of you. I may have misread that and I’ve admitted such but the insults seem uncalled for and you seem to use them in almost every single post of yours. Why? Is it a crutch? Do you talk like that IRL? Are you just extremely young and this is a maturity thing? It seems very weird/immature/trashy to be that consistently rude and profane.
 
Last edited:
UglyCasanova said:
Actually I’m gonna have to eat my words there 😀

No shite the tweet says 2018. The poll was taken from the 11th to the 16th it seems. I was reading it as taken in 2016 but the dude was tweeting about it recently.

But are you thinking blacks have significantly changed their opinion from one way or the other toward Bernie in the last two years? What would he have done since being a presidential candidate to change their levels of excitement?



Edit: and honestly I think constantly posting profanity laced post hurling insults speaks volumes of you. I may have misread that and I’ve admitted such but the insults seem uncalled for and you seem to use them in almost every single post of yours. Why? Is it a crutch? Do you talk like that IRL? Are you just extremely young and this is a maturity thing? It seems very weird/immature/trashy to be that consistently rude and profane.
Click to expand...

Stupid people deserve to be treated like idiots. Keep saying stupid shit and you'll get treated as such. Intelligent people accept facts and change their views accordingly.

I'm glad you admitted you were wrong. It's OK I don't think any less of you.

Now as to your question:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk...der-younger-blacks-democratic-primary-n580996
 
If you say so. I think most view insult and profane filled posts as being rather immature and trailer park-ish, whether you are right or not in whatever point is trying to be made.
 
UglyCasanova said:
If you say so. I think most view insult and profane filled posts as being rather immature and trailer park-ish, whether you are right or not in whatever point is trying to be made.
Click to expand...

I'm sure they do. They also view people who don't accept the facts the same way which why you consistently get treated as such by almost everyone on this forum.

Perhaps you should do some self reflection.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top