• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

DNC hack shows they are willing to lie to cover up the truth about clinton corruption

Says in the article it could have not been formally disclosed because of Canadian tax reasons. He was listed as a donor, but:

Pally went on to cite Canadian tax rules as the reason for the discrepancy.
Click to expand...

The donation amount seems to not have been logged due to taxes. Seems like the author is only half finished with his story...
 
Subyman said:
Says in the article it could have not been formally disclosed because of Canadian tax reasons. He was listed as a donor, but:



The donation amount seems to not have been logged due to taxes. Seems like the author is only half finished with his story...
Click to expand...

But then they go on to note that the tax laws weren't a problem at that point.
 
LegendKiller said:
But then they go on to note that the tax laws weren't a problem at that point.
Click to expand...

However, interviews with tax lawyers and officials in Canada cast doubt on assertions that the partnership was necessary to confer a tax benefit; an examination shows that for many donors it was not needed, and in any event, since 2010, Canadians could have donated to the foundation directly and received the same tax break.
Click to expand...

Nothing in that wording is concrete. There are "doubts" and "for many donors it was not needed". Nothing specific to this particular man.
 
alien42 said:
now for a little reality...

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States under the Department of the Treasury has nine voting members who investigated this deal. Hillary was only one of those, and ultimately, President Obama made the final decision.

https://www.treasury.gov/resource-c...es/Committee-on-Foreign-Investment-in-US.aspx

the irony here is that Hillary is proving to be a better business woman than Trump.
Click to expand...

I suppose lobbying had absolutely nothing to do with it. And do you think there isn't something in it for Obama once he leaves?

Yeah, better at raking in over $140mm from the guys who wanted the deal done.
 
LegendKiller said:
I suppose lobbying had absolutely nothing to do with it. And do you think there isn't something in it for Obama once he leaves?

Yeah, better at raking in over $140mm from the guys who wanted the deal done.
Click to expand...

are you suggesting there is such a thing as politics without lobbying?

are you familiar with the Koch brothers?
 
Imagine if campaigns were limited to one month before an election and they were paid for with public funds and the FCC required all networks free equal time for the parties with 10% or so representation.
 
alien42 said:
now for a little reality...

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States under the Department of the Treasury has nine voting members who investigated this deal. Hillary was only one of those, and ultimately, President Obama made the final decision.

https://www.treasury.gov/resource-c...es/Committee-on-Foreign-Investment-in-US.aspx

the irony here is that Hillary is proving to be a better business woman than Trump.
Click to expand...

That's not ironic, my dog is a better business person than Trump. She's had zero bankruptcies.
 
compuwiz1 said:
Since the OP is catching shit about the Breitbart link:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...dation-said-to-be-breached-by-russian-hackers
Click to expand...

Uhm, that link is about the Clinton Foundation being hacked in general. The OP's link was some half-baked attempt at showing corruption because a known donor didn't have some donations noted although they couldn't prove it wasn't noted because of tax reasons, which was the reason given when asked.

As usual with Breitbart, they go ahead with the story anyway without fully forming the story.
 
werepossum said:
Wasting your time, dude. The left very well understands that Hillary is incredibly corrupt. They prefer it, as long as the "correct" people are getting rich. Well, richer.
Click to expand...

Truth.

Is there really anyone that doesn't think Hillary is corrupt? I honestly didn't even think that was partisan, just FACT.

For example: Do I think Obama is corrupt to the absolute core? No. He MIGHT be, I really don't know, but just because I disagree with a lot of his politics doesn't mean I automatically think he's corrupt.

Hillary? Come on. Corrupt as it gets.
 
Moonbeam said:
Imagine if campaigns were limited to one month before an election and they were paid for with public funds and the FCC required all networks free equal time for the parties with 10% or so representation.
Click to expand...


There was a time when the D's would have agreed with you while the R's certainly didn't. Now a days both parties have strong tethers to big money and would prefer not to give that up.

If only the election process was owned by the people...


Brian
 
Moonbeam said:
Imagine if campaigns were limited to one month before an election and they were paid for with public funds and the FCC required all networks free equal time for the parties with 10% or so representation.
Click to expand...
Shame imagining it is all we can do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top