i think i made the right decision going with the Noctua D14 over the H50, my idle temps are within 5 degrees C of my ambient temps of 68-70F
yep i can't seem to break 39c full load @ 1.45vCore 3.4ghz loaded with 1hr of linXIdle temperatures are utterly useless! What matters is the peak temperatures you see under full load. Always.
Certainly you will be nowhere near the thermal capacity of either cooler with an Athlon II!
Idle temperatures are utterly useless! What matters is the peak temperatures you see under full load. Always.
yes i know very little heat is put out @ idle, but it does mean something to everyone. Everyone would prefer a lower idle temp over a high idle temp. And thats all i'm saying here.
So the corsair kit cAn't be beat at $80 with a custom kit? I'd look into this kit for my v351 build... With amd x4 620.
Is the corsair kit better than a true with 1x 1500 fan?
Aside from the Danger Den kit that was on clearance at Fry's, I don't think I've seen an off-the-shelf wc setup that can match the H50 for the price.
i'm a water cooler myself and understand that theres less airflow for the MB when WCing. These days we generally don't have overheating and hot chipsets such as the crappy NF4 chipset of 2004/2005. i wouldn't be so worried about our NB's overheating these days...
Sure, you can beat the corsair with a custom kit but not with off the shelf parts. If you bargain shop in the FS/FT sections, you can assemble a killer loop for under $80 easily IMHO.
See above.
"The idle temps don't really matter" saying, probably got its birth in this squabble where even crappy air was beating high end water at idle.
a bad mount on CPU Cooler ___ will result in bad temps @ idle&load
a CPU operating not up to FULL LOAD with good idle temps will have good temps. Of course, this varies with the heat dissipating potential of the cooler.
Lets take my Noctua D14 for example. i am idling right now, at 25c. Do you think i will have good or bad load temps?
Now lets take that same scenario. Noctua D14 idling at 25c. Now lets take for given that i have a bad mount. It is clear that there will be more of a range between load-idle temps with the bad mount because more hot air is trapped above the CPU and not dissipated.
Hence, the mount is the determining factor, not load.
Rubycon - I think you may be misunderstand what I was saying.
Long ago especially when the sensors were off die, a watercooled system with lack of air flow around the socket could get idle temperatures a few degrees higher than air cooling.
I can't tell you how many people would come in the oveclockers water forums complaining that they just bought a new WC setup and their idle temperatures are worse than their load temperatures were on air. Once it was pointed out that the load temperatures were that much better, a very common phrase followed "Idle temps do not matter"
This really isn't the case now that temp measurements are now made on die. However, I would bet that if you compared an air cooled vs water cooled (no fan) surrounding socket temperatures, the water cooled would be a bit higher.
a bad mount on CPU Cooler ___ will result in bad temps @ idle&load
a CPU operating not up to FULL LOAD with good idle temps will have good temps. Of course, this varies with the heat dissipating potential of the cooler.
Lets take my Noctua D14 for example. i am idling right now, at 25c. Do you think i will have good or bad load temps?
Now lets take that same scenario. Noctua D14 idling at 25c. Now lets take for given that i have a bad mount. It is clear that there will be more of a range between load-idle temps with the bad mount because more hot air is trapped above the CPU and not dissipated.
Hence, the mount is the determining factor, not load.
not always. I can mount a cooler without TIM at all and my temps are nearly identical at idle with TIM. However, the problem clearly manifests itself as soon as you apply a load.
You prob got me there. But what idiot doesn't use by tim?
You prob got me there. But what idiot doesn't use by tim?