<< "As far as encoding goes, that's a load of BS. Not the fact that the Pee 4 encodes faster, the fact the encoding DIVX and SVCD is something most people would bother to do. Why, to get a crappy looking Movie that you've already seen? Hell if you are going to steal it you might as well download it of the net and let some other fool do all the work for you."
Seriously... why bother? You get a lower quality (video AND audio) product, for a significant amount of effort. Now I can understand wanting to download a movie that is still in the theatres. But why copy DVD's?
I'm not one who collects movies, because I'd never watch them multiple times.
Those of you who do, I pose the questions:
Do you really watch all of them enough to justify the cost/time/effort?
Or do you have several movies that you haven't had a chance to watch, and probably never will? >>
FWIW, some people use Divx for more than just pirating DVD's. In my communications class, we use it for dramatically reducing the size of personal videos we make on our own, thus freeing up hard drive space. Streaming an hour off our Sony's take about 7-8 GB's IIRC, that's quite a bit to store. We don't use it often enough to envoke us to buy the best P4 everytime they release a new one, but I could see where you might if you run a small personal video editing/encoding service (something I may do someday). So why exactly is this a load of BS?