-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
Divorce and 50-50 split of assets; Re: Jeff Gordon's divorce
Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Don't get married if you don't want to risk losing your stuff.
Marriage is taken very lightly in today's society, it's too bad.
Marriage is taken very lightly in today's society, it's too bad.
brunswickite
Diamond Member
rich woman dont marry poor men, its in woman's nature to marry a dominant male and a good provider
woman marry for security(money)
men marry with their d1ck(good looks)
MrDingleDangle
Lifer
She can have the alomony...but I want some p*ssy payments!
Heres the espn article.
He screwed up by not keeping his d1ck in his pants. His wife suspected something and hired a P.I. He came back with evidence Gordon was cheating on her.
Five times less than what he's worth? He's the one who fvcked up and deserves it. Now if it was the case where his wife is psycho and he's the good guy, I would side with him, but thats the not the case.
He screwed up by not keeping his d1ck in his pants. His wife suspected something and hired a P.I. He came back with evidence Gordon was cheating on her.
Five times less than what he's worth? He's the one who fvcked up and deserves it. Now if it was the case where his wife is psycho and he's the good guy, I would side with him, but thats the not the case.
brunswickite
Diamond Member
haha true comedic genius
TommyVercetti
Diamond Member
So how does this 50/50 work? Half of EVERYTHING? So let's say I get divorced. me and my wife were married 5 years. Before we got married, I had $10K in savings, and she has $15K. After getting married, we buy a house (mortgage) and 2 cars (loan). We still have our seperate savings from before. So if I got a divorce, how is 50/50 done in this case, there are no real things, just mortgages and loans? What do I get?
imported_Tomato
Diamond Member
brunswickite
Diamond Member
depends, i would assume you loose the house, and would split any joint accounts.
the variable that screws you up is kids, then you loose more
TommyVercetti
Diamond Member
Loose the house? But the house is barely paid for, it's a mortgage. So I just give up my name on the house, and transfer the mortgage onto her name? What if the mortgage company doesn't think she qualifies to pay for a house?
TommyVercetti
Diamond Member
I think it only works one way. The guy always loses.
MrDingleDangle
Lifer
what i really dont get, this is possibly the only political topic that i have never heard anyone say is fair, unless they are getting the money or child,
so why is it still this way? why has no one done anything about it?
edit: im not talking about this case where the guy cheated...but most people know or have heard of a case where the guy was a good guy and still got screwed
so why is it still this way? why has no one done anything about it?
edit: im not talking about this case where the guy cheated...but most people know or have heard of a case where the guy was a good guy and still got screwed
These days, odds are about 50% that a given marriage will end up in divorce. With numbers like that and given the perceived unfairness of divorce settlements towards men, it's difficult to understand why people (and men in particular) are so willing to jump into marriage in the first place.
As long as there no children involved, it seems to me that simply living together makes more sense. You have most of the benefits of marriage with relatively few of marriage's disadvantages.
As long as there no children involved, it seems to me that simply living together makes more sense. You have most of the benefits of marriage with relatively few of marriage's disadvantages.
Wrong the most fvcked up thing about the american divorce system is the no-fault divorce system. The courts simply don't care about the circumstances of a divorce, they are just interested in dissolving partnerships. This may be fine and dandy if you have two individuals who are amicable about a divorce. But in those situations where this isn't the case - watch out.
...but most people know or have heard of a case where the guy was a good guy and still got screwed[/quote]
I have to laugh about this, I can think of 3 cases offhand, of females I know who were carrying the financial burdens in their households prior to their divorce, yeah I can imagine their exes surprise when the child support rulings came down.
Reality is that in most cases of divorce the males income goes up in the years after the divorce, while the females declines. This is certainly true in my case, since I can not travel in my career due to day care issues.
I have to laugh about this, I can think of 3 cases offhand, of females I know who were carrying the financial burdens in their households prior to their divorce, yeah I can imagine their exes surprise when the child support rulings came down.
Reality is that in most cases of divorce the males income goes up in the years after the divorce, while the females declines. This is certainly true in my case, since I can not travel in my career due to day care issues.
StormRider
Diamond Member
I wonder if she would be satisfied with a guy that has a small one. By small one, I'm talking about my bank account compared to Jeff Gordon's.
I have no problem with 50/50 of what was accumulated or earned from the date of marriage.
I do have a problem with one party (usually the man) going into the marriage with significant assets and the other with nothing (usually the woman), and the latter being entitled to half of everything upon filing for divorce one year later.
I do have a problem with one party (usually the man) going into the marriage with significant assets and the other with nothing (usually the woman), and the latter being entitled to half of everything upon filing for divorce one year later.
They didn't have a prenup, from what I understand.
She is simply a gold digger, and I think this proves it.
The law is heavily tilted in favor of the woman, and in the past it was necessary. The dirty little secret about feminists is that they SAY they want equality, but in reality, they love the ability to rake men over the coals in court. They surely don't want equality in that arena.
Wrong. The prenup protects whatever it says that it protects. What you own BEFORE you're married remains yours, at least in this state. Marital property is what you acquire after you're married. That's what the prenup is for. Someone like Gordon knows damn well that he's going to make plenty after he's married, so it is ridiculous to NOT have a prenup.
She is simply a gold digger, and I think this proves it.
The law is heavily tilted in favor of the woman, and in the past it was necessary. The dirty little secret about feminists is that they SAY they want equality, but in reality, they love the ability to rake men over the coals in court. They surely don't want equality in that arena.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
