• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Disproportionate distribution of mass in body.

Status
Not open for further replies.

OinkBoink

Senior member
Okay, so I have a fairly slender build. In the last few months I've put on about 20 kg (44 lbs).
The thing is, my hands and legs, although have marginally bulked up, still tend to be slender. But now I have a huge ass belly. I mean, WTF. It's annoying. I know hitting the gym might help, but normally people tend to put on weight all over their body in a fairly proportionate manner. I guess it boils down to genes ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's a ton of weight in a very short time. Your body will even it out in time, but I wouldn't recommend letting it stay around to do so. What did you do to gain so much weight so fast?
 
kimkkanye34.jpg
 
That's a ton of weight in a very short time. Your body will even it out in time, but I wouldn't recommend letting it stay around to do so. What did you do to gain so much weight so fast?

Ah, perhaps I should not have used the word 'few'. It took about 6-7 months (or maybe a bit more) I guess. And I ate a lot. Nothing more.

But, I also notice that many men in my family tend to have slender builds with big tummies.
 
Males tend to hold fat in the abdomen and then chest. Its nothing abnormal, do you ever look around at the general public?
 
I kind of have the same problem; when I gain fat, 90% of it goes to my ass and thighs. I guess it's just the way my body is. *shrug*
 
That's an enormous amount of weight in less than a year. Seriously, you need to reassess your lifestyle.
 
Males tend to hold fat in the abdomen and then chest. Its nothing abnormal, do you ever look around at the general public?

Duh, of course I do.



That's an enormous amount of weight in less than a year. Seriously, you need to reassess your lifestyle.

Trust me, I was pretty underweight before. I weighed a mere 50 kg. Now, I'm 70 kg.

I have a query though. Let's take two people A & B.

A- Has a genetic propensity towards being slender.
B- Has a genetic propensity towards being obese.

Let's say we give them the same food in the same span of time. We'd probably notice that B puts on more weight than A. So, what happens to all the energy from the food that A obtains ?

Does it burn faster? If so, how ?
 
WTF told you that? Take a walk around a typical mall and look at women's asses and men's stomachs.

Seriously.

Genes are exactly where it comes into play, and there is a high likelihood of specific methods based upon gender.

In other words, what is quoted above is indeed the typical norm.

Women will often put on mass around the waistline/hips, typically near the glutes, upper thighs, and around the hips.

Men typically put on mass in front of the abdominal wall.

That's typically how our genome approaches excess energy storage/fat deposits. Putting on mass equally distributed across the entire body is not normal, nor is it ideal. That kind of "excess baggage" typically is either a) indicative of other health issues, or b) will directly cause/lead to other health issues. If you can keep all lipid mass gains in the gender-specific areas, long-term health prospects are usually great. Of course, once you gain enough weight, the fat has no choice but to start being deposited elsewhere/everywhere.
Aside from personal image, there usually isn't any health implications with a little excess weight around the hips/stomach/love-handles (obliques).

But it's also a great reminder that you will look much better shedding that weight as opposed to packing on more. Being skinny but having a beer-gut is always the oddest thing to see. But it's very common in men. It's not super common to SEE because people often get far worse, packing on weight elsewhere since the beer gut was in place already. If you get rid of that/don't let it get any worse, it will look weird - but that's your cue: get to work and get rid of it before you get around to "proportionate distribution of mass in body." You DON'T want that.

If you don't want to be skinny - you'll want to pack on muscle with equal distribution. There's no other approach if you want to have a larger frame but remain anywhere close to healthy.
 
I have a query though. Let's take two people A & B.

A- Has a genetic propensity towards being slender.
B- Has a genetic propensity towards being obese.

Let's say we give them the same food in the same span of time. We'd probably notice that B puts on more weight than A. So, what happens to all the energy from the food that A obtains ?

Does it burn faster? If so, how?

If they are healthy (no odd diseases or abnormalities) fully grown adults (so that energy isn't being used for simply growing up), they are the same age/height/weight, and they will be forced to perform exactly the same amount of activity in the span of time given; then the primary difference would be their basal metabolic rate (BMR)...which can vary between individuals for many, many reasons, but probably not by a lot. You will probably find that the difference in weight gain/loss will not be extremely noticeable in the short term. In the long term, it may seem like a big difference, because even a small difference adds up over time.

But outside the generic thought experiment, person 'A' probably tends to put on less weight because his genetics & lifestyle tend to have him eating in a different way and/or having a different level of activity than person 'B'.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top