• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Diskeeper vs PerfectDisk?

G

gizbug

Platinum Member
Been using diskeeper for a long time. Now version 10 is out. I've been reading users prefer PerfectDisk due to it doing a lot better job.

Any comments?
 
i have use dk for a long time and did try out perfectdisk. i really couldn't tell a difference, so i stayed with dk...

perfect disk has options to set the hdd up for most accessed files, etc but it still didn't do much.

i was comparing to dk 9 and whatever version pd was that was out at the same time
 
Tried 'em both. DK was slower and the GUI was not as useful. I get faster response and a better feel for what I am doingin the area of complete optimization wiuth PD. The PD display is a take off on Symantec's old Speed Disk which is good. DK doesn't tell me about the MFT reserved zone and how it impacts on causing fragmentation.

PD's handling of NTSF system files and the page file is outstanding.
 
diskeeper 10 came out a couple of days ago! i checked out a screenshot and they revamped the interface. looks a LOT cleaner and more streamlined.
 
i am evaluating DK 10 right now, temporarirly disabled my loved PD just to see what DK10's Ifaast and the (so called) new and better optimization routines do.
They claim substantial improvements and (on my HD) which was already nicely defraged uptp 24% increase with the new ifaast - anyway i will monitor this and look what's up with those claims.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top