monstercameron
Diamond Member
The sad thing for me is that my bro tossed the the 965be I gave him for a 4690...1 Les phenom user out there.that's good news for the 7 people still using the 955.
seriously though, amazing results.
The sad thing for me is that my bro tossed the the 965be I gave him for a 4690...1 Les phenom user out there.that's good news for the 7 people still using the 955.
seriously though, amazing results.
Of course it is. What else would he do to try make FX look good? 😉
Yea, gpu bottlenecked benchmarks, the favorite of AMD fans since Bulldozer came out. I still remember the AMD graphs showing an FX was as fast as a thousand dollar hex core intel, but the benchmark was gpu limited and in any case quad intel was much cheaper and faster.
That data does show FX in a seeming better light, but it also shows just how bad AMD's DX 11 drivers are.
GPU bottleneck?
Of course it is. What else would he do to try make FX look good? 😉
Obviously a GPU bottleneck. But the takeaway should be how with DX12 even at 1080P an FX8350 is GPU bound, the CPU can feed the GPU and handle it's other duties faster than that very fast GPU can spit frames out. The FX have really aged well and looks like DX12 will only help. I imagine a lot of older CPU's are really going to benefit from DX12.
Just because you don't multitask doesn't mean that others don't. What about interacting with script heavy websites, screen capture software, software compiling, media transcoding etc.What other duties while gaming?
Winrar? 🙂
Even Sandy and old Nehalem will get decent buffs from DX12. All of them aged so well...Obviously a GPU bottleneck. But the takeaway should be how with DX12 even at 1080P an FX8350 is GPU bound, the CPU can feed the GPU and handle it's other duties faster than that very fast GPU can spit frames out. The FX have really aged well and looks like DX12 will only help. I imagine a lot of older CPU's are really going to benefit from DX12.
What other duties while gaming?
Winrar? 🙂
SW is still behind HW in a hard way and it will take years to catch up.I'm actually more impressed that a 7 year old chip supports DX12! I do like what's happening with software. Hardware has peaked and now software is catching up to maximize it. We caught glimpses of that with Win8 and even the IOS 9 release has made the strange iPad 3 bearable with 3D games.
The FX haven't aged well. Its directly awful.
And I think you will be sorely disappointed in the dreams of the DX12 savior as games comes. The AMD sponsored AOTS will pretty much be the best case possible for AMD products we will see.
http://www.computerbase.de/2016-02/ashes-of-the-singularity-directx-12-amd-nvidia/5/
You can just as well use an i3 instead of an FX.
What other duties while gaming?
Winrar? 🙂
Just because you don't multitask doesn't mean that others don't. What about interacting with script heavy websites, screen capture software, software compiling, media transcoding etc.
Edit: the context might've been about all non gpu related tasks the CPU has to do, like physics and ai.
Even Sandy and old Nehalem will get decent buffs from DX12. All of them aged so well...
What he means is the missing multithreading support in AMD's DX11 drivers.
You can see it here:
![]()
The single long dark cyan bar is the driver.
Source: http://www.amd.com/en-us/innovations/software-technologies/directx12
In this presentation you can see, that there is only one driver consumer thread:
http://developer.amd.com/wordpress/media/2013/04/DX11PerformanceReloaded.ppsx
So instead of people thinking this is a great development for gamers,since there are plenty of older desktops using older Intel and AMD CPUs which can be easily upgraded with a Pascal or Polaris card and it will mean less gamers going to consoles,people are bickering.
Waiting for Carrizo results... Expecting a mayor humiliation from Phenom II results.
INB4, Phenom II is far better than current Carrizo.
Ashes doesn't look to do a very good job of leveraging lots of cores/threads from the results I've seen.I am sure the final boost from DX12 is going to be very game dependent and hardware dependent. Ashes (RTS game with a lot of draw calls) on an old, slow cpu like the phenom, is undoubtedly the best case scenario for DX12. And even then, I still consider it more of a technical demo than a real game at this point.
I thought Deserts of Kharak is the best case right now.The FX haven't aged well. Its directly awful.
And I think you will be sorely disappointed in the dreams of the DX12 savior as games comes. The AMD sponsored AOTS will pretty much be the best case possible for AMD products we will see.
Do we have tests with Nvidia cards showing only modest relative gains on weak CPUs?
The results from the PCLab test show scaling even for Nvidia cards under DX12, although it takes a weaker CPU than an i3 to see it. Fun times when a Celeron can keep up with the big boys, even in a benchmark.Yes we do.
So instead of people thinking this is a great development for gamers,since there are plenty of older desktops using older Intel and AMD CPUs which can be easily upgraded with a Pascal or Polaris card and it will mean less gamers going to consoles,people are bickering.