Originally posted by: tami
Originally posted by: AgentJean
Originally posted by: yllus
Not surprising that the Digg community is dumb enough to think this is a "freedom of speech" issue. Exactly what freedom of speech do you have on a privately owned website again? None, you buffoons! Gah.
True, but hasn't the code been "public" knowledge for quite some time now? There's no point trying to defuse a bomb once it explodes. That may be where the outrage is coming from.
Slysoft had HD and AACS support since 2/15 this year.
bomb making information is "public knowledge" too.. will digg take it down because of possible terrorist ties? i would imagine so...
experiment with it, i guess.
it's a matter of being pressured by outside legal authorities in the end. digg can certainly let this in as they please, and trust me, a lot of what passed on digg is questionable to me (then again, 94% of digg is female and i'm in the minority), but when they have to answer the call to a higher authority and risk serious lawsuits for promoting these things, they will act accordingly, not necessarily to the satisfaction to the masses.