- Sep 29, 2000
- 70,150
- 5
- 0
After seeing how some credit card rates are now up to 36% I googled what the legal limit is. I thought it was 29%. It turns out that there isn't really one.
You've probably heard of usury laws, i.e. laws put in place to prevent a lender from gang banging you on his rates. Most states have these and here you can see the rates, they are typically like 8% or low teens or that kind of ballpark.
However, if you borrow out of state from a state that doesn't have them the laws don't apply. Further (from last link)
I realize there are arguments for and against, nothing is Black&White and all that, but the practical implication is that if I felt like lending my next door neighbor who let's say has crappy credit, a loan at 12% it would not be legal in my state. I couldn't even guarantee him that rate for the life of our loan, so if he went on the open market he may get a credit card at, let's say, 22%. But then at a whim they can decide to jack his rate up into the 30's. Just because.
The de facto limit on credit cards has been 29% (worse case) or maybe 22% (likely limit if you have bad credit) in recent years but is obviously climbing up.
I think this can all be summarized in this simple statement: If you borrow money from a person at a non-fixed rate you should always make sure that you could either pay that loan off tomorrow if the rate goes stratospheric or make sure that the rate is otherwise constrained (e.g. mortgage ARM with maximum rate it can ever hit or a credit line pegged to the prime rate, so at least an individual lender cannot screw you without the prime rate going high).
You've probably heard of usury laws, i.e. laws put in place to prevent a lender from gang banging you on his rates. Most states have these and here you can see the rates, they are typically like 8% or low teens or that kind of ballpark.
However, if you borrow out of state from a state that doesn't have them the laws don't apply. Further (from last link)
In
fact, due to high inflation, in 1980, the federal government passed a
special law which allowed national banks (the ones that have the word
"national" or the term "N.A." in their name, and savings banks that are
federally chartered) to ignore state usury limits and pegged the rate of
interest at a certain number of points above the federal reserve
discount rate.
I realize there are arguments for and against, nothing is Black&White and all that, but the practical implication is that if I felt like lending my next door neighbor who let's say has crappy credit, a loan at 12% it would not be legal in my state. I couldn't even guarantee him that rate for the life of our loan, so if he went on the open market he may get a credit card at, let's say, 22%. But then at a whim they can decide to jack his rate up into the 30's. Just because.
The de facto limit on credit cards has been 29% (worse case) or maybe 22% (likely limit if you have bad credit) in recent years but is obviously climbing up.
I think this can all be summarized in this simple statement: If you borrow money from a person at a non-fixed rate you should always make sure that you could either pay that loan off tomorrow if the rate goes stratospheric or make sure that the rate is otherwise constrained (e.g. mortgage ARM with maximum rate it can ever hit or a credit line pegged to the prime rate, so at least an individual lender cannot screw you without the prime rate going high).