BonzaiDuck
Lifer
There were actually three instances of domestic terrorism in the past few weeks, but the two in our minds are those of the mass-assassination Bomber, and Bowers with his synagogue massacre.
Cesar Sayoc was planning to avoid capture. He wasn't as smart as the Unabomber, so the FBI -- having learned much from the Unabomber investigations and more -- was able to nab Sayoc early.
Robert Bowers didn't expect to avoid capture. He was likely planning to punch out by his own hand. He probably didn't even imagine what he would say to the authorities once captured.
Sayoc is obvious as a Trump supporter. This was a bit hard for Trump to circumnavigate in his own public remarks. Showing Sayoc as a Trump supporter obviously has an impact on the public opinion of group opinions in play -- fence-sitters, remorseful Trump voters and others. It will turn some votes in the election.
Bowers, on the other hand, tells the police that he wasn't a Trump supporter. He has social media posts showing some criticism of Trump. And he further explains to the police that he didn't vote for Trump.
How possible is it that his denial in these regards is not true? Would he have quickly learned from the Sayoc case that he could further damage Trump -- in the aftermath of his massacre and capture?
There are secret ballots, and there are trick questions. Maybe you can identify a Trumpie with a trick question. But do we believe Bowers? Or do we suspect he was more of a Trump supporter than he is willing now to admit?
Cesar Sayoc was planning to avoid capture. He wasn't as smart as the Unabomber, so the FBI -- having learned much from the Unabomber investigations and more -- was able to nab Sayoc early.
Robert Bowers didn't expect to avoid capture. He was likely planning to punch out by his own hand. He probably didn't even imagine what he would say to the authorities once captured.
Sayoc is obvious as a Trump supporter. This was a bit hard for Trump to circumnavigate in his own public remarks. Showing Sayoc as a Trump supporter obviously has an impact on the public opinion of group opinions in play -- fence-sitters, remorseful Trump voters and others. It will turn some votes in the election.
Bowers, on the other hand, tells the police that he wasn't a Trump supporter. He has social media posts showing some criticism of Trump. And he further explains to the police that he didn't vote for Trump.
How possible is it that his denial in these regards is not true? Would he have quickly learned from the Sayoc case that he could further damage Trump -- in the aftermath of his massacre and capture?
There are secret ballots, and there are trick questions. Maybe you can identify a Trumpie with a trick question. But do we believe Bowers? Or do we suspect he was more of a Trump supporter than he is willing now to admit?