• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Did Judge Kavanaugh

lol, not because this isn't serious or real, but because it will be brushed aside and excused away, whether or not there is any validity to it or not.
 
alien42 said:
lol, not because this isn't serious or real, but because it will be brushed aside and excused away, whether or not there is any validity to it or not.
Click to expand...

i just viewed the replies by douchebags i have on ignore and sure enough, they both proved my point.
 
I wonder if we'll see any further variation in conservative views of, "don't care, it was such a long time ago, insert baseless assertion about motivations".
 
So long as Kavanaugh sits there on the Supreme Court we can all rest assured that that court is a sham court beholden to a sham Repub led Senate that rammed his appointment through the vetting/selection process in order to pack the court with conservative activist judges owned and operated by every unelected entity that constitutes and represents those special interest groups that think they should be running the gov't rather than the people of the nation.

Shame on those who approve of this travesty of justice.
 
UglyCasanova said:
Another accusation that can never be proven from something that supposedly happened several decades ago as an attempt to take down a political figure? Interesting
Click to expand...

Although I come from 180 degrees different than you, I pretty much agree with what you said. The time for this revelation was BEFORE the confirmation. There was huge publicity then, I am at a loss why this classmate didn't come forward then if he/she thought this had any material value.

I do find it rather interesting that you refer to Kavanaugh as a political figure. Supreme Court justices are supposed to be students of the law, not politicians. Kavanaugh is certainly not that though-he is a political hack picked for two reasons: (1) a guaranteed get out of jail free card for Trump when/if his cases reach the Supreme Court and (2) he adhers to a safe conventional set of authoritarian views (frequently mislabeled as conservative views).
 
If accusers come out just when he's about to be appointed, then it must be a political hit. If they come out way after he was appointed, it must be a political hit. If they accused him at the time, they're trying to destroy a young man's life with a promising future ahead of him.

When's the right time for an accuser to complain about it?
 
alien42 said:
what does shit and a wall have to do with Kavanaugh and this thread? obviously nothing.

also, why are you unable to actually reply to a post? is there some qanon conspiracy that prevents you from doing so?
Click to expand...

Well when he bashes his head against the wall it just causes shit to come out?

There is, its called his mind trying to protect itself from having to deal with how the logic of his brain is broken.
 
UglyCasanova said:
Another accusation that can never be proven from something that supposedly happened several decades ago as an attempt to take down a political figure? Interesting
Click to expand...
Tell us some stories, trumpsterboy, about how many trips Clinton took on the fucking lolita express again, and wink wink, how many underage girls he surely HAVE NOT done much less seen on such a flight, wink wink. Your concern for political hitjobs is a fucking joke much as you are your self. Fake cat, posting fake shit. I am SCHOCKED.
 
it doesnt matter.
He's protected by a fairly decent-sized group of fascists and nothing will happen.
Unless he somehow pisses them off, in which case loads of mysterious evidence will suddenly pop up and he'll be ruined.
 
mikeymikec said:
If accusers come out just when he's about to be appointed, then it must be a political hit. If they come out way after he was appointed, it must be a political hit. If they accused him at the time, they're trying to destroy a young man's life with a promising future ahead of him.

When's the right time for an accuser to complain about it?
Click to expand...
Let’s ask Al Franken and Justin Fairfax.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top