Did Edwards already blow it?

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: UberNeuman

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Why even wonder.... Wash, Rise, Repeat......

Unless you can address the issues that you are having, this dialog is pointless...

In fact, this thread should be locked up as you are unwilling to discuss this in any meaningful manner....

LOL... I think that's the 5th time you've failed to answer my questions. dmcowen has taught you well young padowan!

amazing...

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: palehorse74
do you completely deny that their writings are filled with anti-Christian statements and other hate-filled vulgarities? seriously?!

Take off you partisan blinders...

So what?

Ever hear of that thing call Free Speech?

Attempt #6...or 7...
1) What if their blogs had been bashing gays instead of Christians? Would it still be acceptable for them to work on Edwards' staff?

2) How about yours? would you hire two bloggers known for gay-bashing to work on your campaign? would you consider their bigotry "free speech," and keep them around?

 

[UberNeuman]

Originally posted by: daveymark

Originally posted by: UberNeuman

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Why even wonder.... Wash, Rise, Repeat......

Unless you can address the issues that you are having, this dialog is pointless...

In fact, this thread should be locked up as you are unwilling to discuss this in any meaningful manner....

yes, we get it - you're an apologist for these fembigots. lock 'er up.

Okay, sir - I'll let you take the Pepsi Challenge - go read the comments taken from the bloggers and show us what parts are in any way like hate speech from the KKK or discriminates against Catholics...

/not expecting anything from you either, as I saw your deleted post earlier today before it went bye-bye....

 

[WHAMPOM]

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: palehorse74
do you completely deny that their writings are filled with anti-Christian statements and other hate-filled vulgarities? seriously?!

Take off you partisan blinders...

So what?

Ever hear of that thing call Free Speech?

Attempt #6...or 7...
1) What if their blogs had been bashing gays instead of Christians? Would it still be acceptable for them to work on Edwards' staff?
A: Compare oranges to oranges for once! Bash gays that hate Christians needlessly? Sure they can.
2) How about yours? would you hire two bloggers known for gay-bashing to work on your campaign? would you consider their bigotry "free speech," and keep them around?

As long as they BASH hypocrisy.... More Power to 'EM.

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: palehorse74
do you completely deny that their writings are filled with anti-Christian statements and other hate-filled vulgarities? seriously?!

Take off you partisan blinders...

So what?

Ever hear of that thing call Free Speech?

Attempt #6...or 7...
1) What if their blogs had been bashing gays instead of Christians? Would it still be acceptable for them to work on Edwards' staff?

2) How about yours? would you hire two bloggers known for gay-bashing to work on your campaign? would you consider their bigotry "free speech," and keep them around?

does anyone else hear crickets?...

 

[OrByte]

your questions were answered a long time ago. You just aren't bright enough to understand.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: loki8481
bloggers or no, I don't think Edwards has a chance... remember how badly he got demolished in the '04 VP debate vs Cheney?

Yeah his inexperiance really was a factor, especially when it came to debating the decietful and despicable Dick Cheney. It's a real shame too when you consider how much damage Cheney has done to our Nation as brains behind the disasterous current Administration.

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: OrByte
your questions were answered a long time ago. You just aren't bright enough to understand.

please SHOW ME where anyone here answered the following questions directly (I didnt happen, so good luck finding them!):

1) What if their blogs had been bashing gays instead of Christians? Would it still be acceptable for them to work on Edwards' staff?

2) How about yours? would you hire two bloggers known for gay-bashing to work on your campaign? would you consider their bigotry "free speech," and keep them around?

You and dwcowen consistently side-step the question because you know that any honest answer would destroy your entire argument here.

bet!

 

[dmcowen674]

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: OrByte
your questions were answered a long time ago. You just aren't bright enough to understand.

please SHOW ME where anyone here answered the following questions directly (I didnt happen, so good luck finding them!):

1) What if their blogs had been bashing gays instead of Christians? Would it still be acceptable for them to work on Edwards' staff?

Yes, Gay bashing is protected Free speech (hell Republicans including the President bash them on a daily basis) as mush as christian, black, white or any other bashing.

2) How about yours? would you hire two bloggers known for gay-bashing to work on your campaign? would you consider their bigotry "free speech," and keep them around?

Any and all are welcome to their opinion including you.

Your opinion is yours alone.

Maybe from whatever country you are posting from or came from it is against the law or Constitution of your Country but the U.S. still has free speech here.

Maybe not for long at this rate but it's still there.

You and dwcowen consistently side-step the question because you know that any honest answer would destroy your entire argument here.

bet!

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: OrByte
your questions were answered a long time ago. You just aren't bright enough to understand.

please SHOW ME where anyone here answered the following questions directly (I didnt happen, so good luck finding them!):

1) What if their blogs had been bashing gays instead of Christians? Would it still be acceptable for them to work on Edwards' staff?

Yes, Gay bashing is protected Free speech (hell Republicans including the President bash them on a daily basis) as mush as christian, black, white or any other bashing.

2) How about yours? would you hire two bloggers known for gay-bashing to work on your campaign? would you consider their bigotry "free speech," and keep them around?

Any and all are welcome to their opinion including you.

Your opinion is yours alone.

Maybe from whatever country you are posting from or came from it is against the law or Constitution of your Country but the U.S. still has free speech here.

Maybe not for long at this rate but it's still there.

You and dwcowen consistently side-step the question because you know that any honest answer would destroy your entire argument here.

bet!

Thank you for at least answering the questions. I do not believe you are being honest, but hey, at least you answered them.

I am going to file your response away until the next "guilty by association" attack on a Republican candidate.

 

[dmcowen674]

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: OrByte
your questions were answered a long time ago. You just aren't bright enough to understand.

please SHOW ME where anyone here answered the following questions directly (I didnt happen, so good luck finding them!):

1) What if their blogs had been bashing gays instead of Christians? Would it still be acceptable for them to work on Edwards' staff?

Yes, Gay bashing is protected Free speech (hell Republicans including the President bash them on a daily basis) as mush as christian, black, white or any other bashing.

2) How about yours? would you hire two bloggers known for gay-bashing to work on your campaign? would you consider their bigotry "free speech," and keep them around?

Any and all are welcome to their opinion including you.

Your opinion is yours alone.

Maybe from whatever country you are posting from or came from it is against the law or Constitution of your Country but the U.S. still has free speech here.

Maybe not for long at this rate but it's still there.

You and dwcowen consistently side-step the question because you know that any honest answer would destroy your entire argument here.

bet!

Thank you for at least answering the questions. I do not believe you are being honest, but hey, at least you answered them.

I am going to file your response away until the next "guilty by association" attack on a Republican candidate.

There's a difference between "association" and actually doing.

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: OrByte
your questions were answered a long time ago. You just aren't bright enough to understand.

please SHOW ME where anyone here answered the following questions directly (I didnt happen, so good luck finding them!):

1) What if their blogs had been bashing gays instead of Christians? Would it still be acceptable for them to work on Edwards' staff?

Yes, Gay bashing is protected Free speech (hell Republicans including the President bash them on a daily basis) as mush as christian, black, white or any other bashing.

2) How about yours? would you hire two bloggers known for gay-bashing to work on your campaign? would you consider their bigotry "free speech," and keep them around?

Any and all are welcome to their opinion including you.

Your opinion is yours alone.

Maybe from whatever country you are posting from or came from it is against the law or Constitution of your Country but the U.S. still has free speech here.

Maybe not for long at this rate but it's still there.

You and dwcowen consistently side-step the question because you know that any honest answer would destroy your entire argument here.

bet!

Thank you for at least answering the questions. I do not believe you are being honest, but hey, at least you answered them.

I am going to file your response away until the next "guilty by association" attack on a Republican candidate.

There's a difference between "association" and actually doing.

you're absolutely correct. However, common sense dictates that decent Presidential candidates should avoid associating with known bigots.

 

[erickj92]

yes

 

[Corbett]

Somehow, I think if these bloggers were Christians bashing gays or Muslims and they were hired in by McCain or Giuliani (sp?), the same reactions by the lefties in this thread would be completely the opposite.

 

[marincounty]

Keep it up, O'Reilly and other right-wingers, and your dream will come true-
President Hillary.