• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Diane Feinstein releases Fusion GPS testimony.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Thunder 57 said:
That's how it goes here. Say something that goes against the popular viewpoint and get a stupid reply like "Duh version" or "Derp". There's plenty more but I don't care to remember them all.



Well I'm certainly not here to make friends.
Click to expand...
Say something meaningful.
 
FIVR said:
We get it, you love the FBI. They can do nothing wrong. Even when they obviously conspire to destroy a candidate days before an election, on national television, while they know the competing campaign is conspiring with enemy foreign powers.... they did nothing wrong. It was all "obligatory".


Sadly, the FBI doesn't love America. They love Trump. Or maybe, they used to... until he became president and fired their leader.
Click to expand...
Why would the FBI conspire with Trump to ruin Hillary? Who gains?
 
UberNeuman said:
https://www.feinstein.senate.gov/pu...D915E97709D2F.simpson-transcript-redacted.pdf
Direct link above.

One of the early things coming out that there was someone in the Trump campaign leaking information out about the Trump/Russian ties during the campaign.
Click to expand...
Yes... finally. Diane Feinstein. What a great woman.

First thing I take away is the informant within the campaign contacting FBI.. Now there is an additional source of the FBI investigation.. They will have to find another angle to get rid of Mueller now.
 
Last edited:
Reddit comments are pretty entertaining

In case people don't know: it's likely that Grassley and Graham used their "criminal referral" of Christopher Steele as an effort to avoid disclosing this transcript. Democrats had been pushing for its disclosure, and Grassley is now saying he can't release it because the contents are "under investigation." The "investigation" being his own referral to the DOJ.

Feinstein said "fuck that noise" and unilaterally released the transcript.
Click to expand...

From my understanding it's not illegal since the document wasn't classified. It's very much against procedure/rules and she will likely be censured, which just means 51 senators will vote yes on a piece of paper that says she was mean.
Click to expand...
 
Thunder 57 said:
You must be joking. If Comey was "in league" with the Trump campaign, Hillary would've been charged.

If the Democrats nominated Joe Biden, or hell, anyone but Hillary, we'd wouldn't have Trump today. That is why I find this funny:



Also, what does the whole "buttery emails" thing mean?
Click to expand...

Charged with what? Seriously can you present literally anything he could have realistically charged her with? Because Republicans have been trying to figure out anything and have not been able to come up with a single one that would actually hold up to any legal scrutiny. And they've spent hundreds of millions of dollars trying.

That doesn't even matter at all, with regards to the GOP candidate openly working with a foreign power, and very probably being outright blackmailed by it. What would your response be if Democrats had won President and gotten Senate majority, and then they launched investigations in to this? Let me guess your argument would be, there's no way Turmp's campaign colluded with Russia, he didn't even win!

Its super secret dirty liberal codespeak.

Thunder 57 said:
That's how it goes here. Say something that goes against the popular viewpoint and get a stupid reply like "Duh version" or "Derp". There's plenty more but I don't care to remember them all.



Well I'm certainly not here to make friends.
Click to expand...

No, that's how it goes when you reveal that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about but post idiotic right wing memes/comics.

That's not too surprising that you can't remember more than that, considering you don't seem to know anything more than Turmp and Hilary are names of people involved in this. Everything beyond that seems to exceed your knowledge of the situation.

Frankly, derp is much more of a response than your post was even worthy of. I only responded because I like to give people a bit of a chance to understand their idiocy

Ok? Who said anything about friends? Simply put, you provided nothing even remotely substantial to the topic of the thread. And then you showed that you're not even interested in doing that. That's why you're getting the reactions you are.

Also, WTF, is with conservative posters consistently doing the same thing? They start out by revealing blatant ignorance of even basic info, then they try to insult, and when called on it then they comment about friends.
 
cytg111 said:
Add something then to the point of the transcript? Cant? Thats why you are derping... gtfo.
Click to expand...

Meh, probably just having a different point of view would be derping.

darkswordsman17 said:
Charged with what? Seriously can you present literally anything he could have realistically charged her with?...
Click to expand...

You missed the point. I was responding to this:

This transcript basically confirms that James Comey and the FBI were in league with the Trump campaign.
Click to expand...

I was pointing out the fact that is absurd. If this was the case, he would have charged her with something, whether there was a basis for it or not.


No, that's how it goes when you reveal that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about but post idiotic right wing memes/comics.

That's not too surprising that you can't remember more than that, considering you don't seem to know anything more than Turmp and Hilary are names of people involved in this. Everything beyond that seems to exceed your knowledge of the situation.

Frankly, derp is much more of a response than your post was even worthy of. I only responded because I like to give people a bit of a chance to understand their idiocy

Ok? Who said anything about friends? Simply put, you provided nothing even remotely substantial to the topic of the thread. And then you showed that you're not even interested in doing that. That's why you're getting the reactions you are.

Also, WTF, is with conservative posters consistently doing the same thing? They start out by revealing blatant ignorance of even basic info, then they try to insult, and when called on it then they comment about friends.
Click to expand...

Rabble rabble rabble. I'm an incompetent idiot that is making America stupid again. I get it. Forgive me if I don't keep a list of stupid responses. I don't let things like that bother me.

I said I wasn't here to make friends because this is a political forum where conservative ideas are not welcomed. Also, my first post here was a response to the above mentioned fallacy regarding Comey. I think that's relevant. Also, I'm getting the reactions I'm getting because this forum is uber-liberal. I wouldn't know if the whole "friends" things is the MO of conservatives here, because they are basically non-existent.

I hold liberal views on many things. I have expressed that I do not like Trump. Yet that is not enough. I am just glad that this forum is in no way representative of the US as a whole.
 
Thunder 57 said:
Meh, probably just having a different point of view would be derping.



You missed the point. I was responding to this:



I was pointing out the fact that is absurd. If this was the case, he would have charged her with something, whether there was a basis for it or not.




Rabble rabble rabble. I'm an incompetent idiot that is making America stupid again. I get it. Forgive me if I don't keep a list of stupid responses. I don't let things like that bother me.

I said I wasn't here to make friends because this is a political forum where conservative ideas are not welcomed. Also, my first post here was a response to the above mentioned fallacy regarding Comey. I think that's relevant. Also, I'm getting the reactions I'm getting because this forum is uber-liberal. I wouldn't know if the whole "friends" things is the MO of conservatives here, because they are basically non-existent.

I hold liberal views on many things. I have expressed that I do not like Trump. Yet that is not enough. I am just glad that this forum is in no way representative of the US as a whole.
Click to expand...
Neither is Conservatism. That's the true thing to be thankful of.
 
Younigue said:
Neither is Conservatism. That's the true thing to be thankful of.
Click to expand...

Different viewpoints be dammed! I thought we were supposed to be all about diversity? Diversity at work that way you get ideas and opinions from people with varying ethnicity, as well as men and women. Should those in power have a bunch of "yes men" as advisers? Or should they have people with varying points of view making arguments one way or another?
 
It's coincidental that MSNBC was featuring "The Most Dangerous Man in America" last week, a re-run about Elsberg and the Pentagon Papers. I'm always looking for these coincidences and their timing in media. Would it be possible that someone with that cable station had advance notice of what Feinstein planned? It's so uncertain that it's hardly worth trying to sort out.

But then, the Elsberg history also dovetails with the story about Fusion GTS and Christopher Steele.

I'm glad she's my US Senator. I'm glad Harris was able to get the seat vacated by Boxer.
 
Thunder 57 said:
Different viewpoints be dammed! I thought we were supposed to be all about diversity? Diversity at work that way you get ideas and opinions from people with varying ethnicity, as well as men and women. Should those in power have a bunch of "yes men" as advisers? Or should they have people with varying points of view making arguments one way or another?
Click to expand...
LOL! I'm open to any but the Conservative point of view. Conservatives are regressives that MUST repress, suppress and oppress to get their way. Their point of view isn't worth hearing.
 
cytg111 said:
Could you stop talking about yourself? Something about fuck your feelings?
Click to expand...

You know when you do that I can't even tell what you're quoting? I mean, hell, did I really upset you that much? I guess this is the point where I tell you to go fuck yourself for being a moron?
 
Thunder 57 said:
You know when you do that I can't even tell what you're quoting? I mean, hell, did I really upset you that much? I guess this is the point where I tell you to go fuck yourself for being a moron?
Click to expand...
Awesome! Overstating your impact. Puff out your chest immediately!
 
BonzaiDuck said:
It's coincidental that MSNBC was featuring "The Most Dangerous Man in America" last week, a re-run about Elsberg and the Pentagon Papers. I'm always looking for these coincidences and their timing in media. Would it be possible that someone with that cable station had advance notice of what Feinstein planned? It's so uncertain that it's hardly worth trying to sort out.

But then, the Elsberg history also dovetails with the story about Fusion GTS and Christopher Steele.

I'm glad she's my US Senator. I'm glad Harris was able to get the seat vacated by Boxer.
Click to expand...


I wonder if the new movie, The Post, had any influence on the timing of it re-running? The movie's two main production companies, DreamWorks and Amblin, are both owned by NBCUniversal, which also owns MSNBC and NBC.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top