Developing~ Sestak Says He was Offered Job To Not Challenge Specters Senate Seat

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Read the comments below the article to get a little feel for some of the politics involved in this developing story. This display of corruption in government isn't going to be good for Obama, or the Dems. Sestak has painted himself into a corner.




link




Sestak says federal job was offered to quit race
Not so, says the White House
By Thomas Fitzgerald



Rep. Joe Sestak (D., Pa.) said yesterday that the White House offered him a federal job in an effort to dissuade him from challenging Sen. Arlen Specter in the state's Democratic primary.

The disclosure came during an afternoon taping of Larry Kane: Voice of Reason, a Sunday news-analysis show on the Comcast Network. Sestak would not elaborate on the circumstances and seemed chagrined after blurting out "yes" to veteran news anchor Kane's direct question.

"Was it secretary of the Navy?" Kane asked.

"No comment," Sestak said.

"Was it [the job] high-ranking?" Kane asked. Sestak said yes, but added that he would "never leave" the Senate race for a deal.

A White House spokesman this morning strongly denied an offer had been made to Sestak. Before the spokesman issued the denial, a senior Pennsylvania Democrat said Sestak's account was met with anger by White House officials yesterday.

After yesterday's taping, Sestak said he recalled the White House offer coming in July, as he was preparing to formally announce his Senate candidacy in August. He declined to identify who spoke to him or the job under discussion. Sestak also would not say whether the person who approached him worked for the administration or was an intermediary for the offer.

"I'm not going to say who or how and what was offered," Sestak said in an interview. "I don't feel it's appropriate to go beyond what I said," because the conversation was confidential.

Sestak, 58, a retired Navy admiral, has said that some Pennsylvania Democratic leaders have tried to entice him to drop his campaign with promises of support for other offices in the future. He also has said that Sen. Robert Menendez of New Jersey, chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, urged him to run when Specter was still a Republican, then tried to force him out after Specter switched parties.

But Sestak has brushed aside talk of White House pressure.

"He asked me the question, and I had to answer it honestly," Sestak said of his exchange with Kane. Sestak said he had declined the job offer immediately and added, "The person said, 'I knew you'd say that.' "

It's no secret that leading Democrats are backing Specter, a five-term incumbent who switched from the GOP last spring, soon after providing the critical vote for President Obama's $787 billion stimulus program.

Obama endorsed Specter at the White House and has raised money for him. Gov. Rendell has been vocal in calling Sestak's challenge harmful to the party, as has state chairman T.J. Rooney.

Party leaders are worried that an expensive primary could weaken an incumbent Democratic senator in what is shaping up to be a Republican year, and also about the possibility of losing the House seat that Sestak won in 2006. He is only the second Democrat since the Civil War to represent the Delaware County-centered Seventh District.

An added concern: possibly losing the seat in Harrisburg occupied by the leading Democratic candidate to replace Sestak in Congress, State Rep. Bryan Lentz. Democrats have a 104-99 majority in the state House; control of the chamber is crucial with Pennsylvania expected to lose a congressional district next year in the reapportionment that follows the census.

Still, Sestak's account was startling.

"Clearly, the offers are made," said Ross Baker, a Rutgers University political science professor who specializes in Congress. "When a White House wants to preempt a challenge, they'll dangle something. But it is almost never uttered."

In addition, Baker said, conversations in such cases are nuanced, and savvy operators know not to use explicit quid pro quo language.

He said he could not, off hand, think of another instance in which a candidate has divulged an approach from White House officials. Baker said that, in theory, that might be an advantageous gambit for a candidate who, like Sestak, is positioning his campaign as an outsider and wants to demonstrate that "the big guys" are worried about the challenge.

Nachama Soloveichik, spokeswoman for former Rep. Pat Toomey, the leading GOP candidate for the Senate seat, said she had no information on Sestak's story but added: "It's just like Arlen Specter to get an insider Washington deal to try to save his political career."

Christopher Nicholas, Specter's campaign manager, declined to comment on the report or the Toomey campaign comment.

Last week, after Sestak received nominating petitions for the House from the Pennsylvania secretary of state, talk buzzed in political circles that he would give up the Senate race and run for reelection.

He says he is running only for the Senate, and volunteers are circulating nominating petitions for that office.

Legally, Sestak could circulate two sets of petitions, and experts say there is no prohibition on running for two offices simultaneously.


Article comment copied from link~
Still waiting for you to muster what little courage you have remaining, Mr. Fitzgerald. Various people (such as former Sestak employee David Diano) are now speculating online about the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) probe of Sestak's links to UFCW Local 1776 President Wendell Young IV. The FBI suspects that Young IV bribed Sestak in late 2006. Yes, a local Congressman is under investigation for bribery, and here you sit - occupying space. The Office oF Congressional Ethics (OCE), meanwhile, continues its own inquiry into Sestak for Congress' fundraising practices. Sestak is employing a desperate strategy. He hopes a deal can be struck: he brings his Senate bid to a close, and in exchange the White House and influential Democrats intercede on his behalf with the Justice Department. How else can you account for Sestak's imprudent, ill-advised reamrks? Get busy, Mr. Fitzgerald - and remind us all why you once rose to prominence.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Shouldn't be a surprise to anyone. This administration was handing out positions for party gains long before this example. Anyone think Judd Gregg was offered the position of Commerce Secretary because Obama valued his input?
 

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,270
103
106
Interesting and disappointing if true. Not surprising I guess, but that's just how things seem to work. It's probably always been that way throughout history.
 

classy

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
15,219
1
81
This seems like a lie and ploy. For one, according to Rasmussen, Specter has a 15 point lead over Sestak, so I see no reason at all for the White House to try and "buy out" a guy who is polling signifcantly behind. Two its an accusation, but yet he does not say what the job was, when it was offered, who offered it, or even how it was offered. Sounds like pure desperate politics. And three, while Toomey is polling ahead of Sestak and Specter, Specter is doing better. So in looking at all of the facts available it seems highly unlikely this happened.
 
Last edited:

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
every single political administration in the history of human existence has done this.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,555
33,247
136
Was the job offered a political appointment? If so, corruption not found.

Was the job offered a civil service position? If so, and this story can be proved in court, someone is going to jail.
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Given Sestak's precarious legal problems, I am guessing that it is the latter.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Hardly surprising? This has been business as usual in Washington for longer than Chicago has even existed.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Was the job offered a political appointment? If so, corruption not found.

Was the job offered a civil service position? If so, and this story can be proved in court, someone is going to jail.

Sestak's own words are that it was a "high-ranking" job. That means political appointment. In which case, nothing to see here, but the talk radioheads/bloggers will probably be jerking themselves off all week.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Sestak's own words are that it was a "high-ranking" job. That means political appointment. In which case, nothing to see here, but the talk radioheads/bloggers will probably be jerking themselves off all week.
Perhaps. It's also possible he made it up to score political points. If it's true, though, it echos of Chicago politics even more so than DC politics - and political corruption is always "something to see". I don't see this story going anywhere though; even if Holder (meaning Obama) for some reason chose to pursue it, it would be nothing more than he said/she said.
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
They were worried about Sestak depleting Specter's war-chest, not Sestak winning

Sen. Arlen Specter has been defeated in a Pennsylvania primary in his bid for a sixth term after taking the risky step of switching to the Democratic Party

I'm thinking Toomey will end up with the seat...
 

Jadow

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2003
5,962
2
0
This seems like a lie and ploy. For one, according to Rasmussen, Specter has a 15 point lead over Sestak, so I see no reason at all for the White House to try and "buy out" a guy who is polling signifcantly behind. Two its an accusation, but yet he does not say what the job was, when it was offered, who offered it, or even how it was offered. Sounds like pure desperate politics. And three, while Toomey is polling ahead of Sestak and Specter, Specter is doing better. So in looking at all of the facts available it seems highly unlikely this happened.

And Sestak shots a 3 pointer HE scores! 15 point lead eliminated, Sestak wins!

The ornery old cuss goes down in defeat
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,035
32,232
136
My theory is he was offered Senator for life after he concocted the ultimate spin for the Warren Commission. Time finally caught up with him.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
As previously mentioned, it doesn't matter now, Arlen is OUT!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And while I suspect Jiggz is a 100% correct, there is always the Liberman example of winning as an independent to further fuel Arlan mania.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
My theory is he was offered Senator for life after he concocted the ultimate spin for the Warren Commission. Time finally caught up with him.

I predict a massive investigation where Specter "proves" massive election fraud, how his career was killed by a single ballot that hit every precinct and was counted over and over. It's official name will be called the Single Ballot Theory, but folks will call it the Magic Ballot Theory.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
That turncoat Specter is finally gone. Now Systak can go down in defeat in November and another seat will be allocated to reclaiming America.
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Is that even technically corruption? Businesses hire potential competitors all the time.