Amused
Elite Member
- Apr 14, 2001
- 57,547
- 20,262
- 146
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
85-90% of the people I see in fullsize SUVs are driving around by themselves. That's a waste of space and resources. Clearly many people don't NEED these vehicles, if they did then the used car lots wouldn't be full of them now would they? I was merely stating a fact.
This makes me laugh.
Say a large family buys an SUV as one of their primary cars. Even when regularly used for it's capacity, it will be driven by a single driver better than 60% of the time.
Return trips from dropping the kids off, rides to work and back and Errands make up better than 60% of it's use. Mor like 70%.
Does that mean they need it any less? Of course not. They still have 5 kids and a boat to haul around. Just because you happen to see them when they aren't doing to you ignorantly jump to conclusions.
Gladys Kravitz, folks. That's all it's about here.
Walk by any used car lot and tell me what you see there. Then go look at the big 3's sales numbers for September and tell me what conclusions you can draw from that. It's pretty clear to me. Many people have decided that they don't need a fullsize SUV. If they did they'd be buying them or keeping the ones they already have. I don't know about you but that's pretty much the only conclusion I can draw from this recent trend.
Clearly, many people don't NEED them. That's all I'm saying. Want and need are two completely different things and I think most people who drive fullsize SUVs are driving them out of want and not need.
Who the fvck is gladys krackzitz anyway?
Many people don't NEED a car at all. But it sure is nice. Just because SUV sales are down doesn't mean the people who would have previously considered them wouldn't have made good use of them.
Hell, we don't NEED 90% of the crap we have. But most of it sure is convenient.
In fact, I bet you waste far more energy on crap you don't need, than a person wastes driving an SUV vs a fullsize car.
Never watched Bewitched, huh? Gladys Kravitz was their busybody neighbor.
I don't see that the two are comparable quite frankly. I know a guy who used to drive from Garden Grove to Carlsbad every day in a Suburban. He has a wife and 2 kids and spent 90% of his time hauling nothing but himself around in that thing spending $150/week in gas. Now it would probably cost him $200/week or $800 a month!!! That's a lot of money to be throwing away just for the "convenience" of driving a suburban...whatever that means. :roll:
My point is that people who REALLY NEED a vehicle like that will keep them but those who just wanted it are discovering that the trade off isn't worth the "convenience" and they are switching to smaller more economical cars. I'm happy about that. I don't know why you people defend the SUV and the "right to drive" whatever the hell you want attitude like cheap gasoline is a god given right as an American.
Fine then. I think Internet service should be $500 a month because that will weed out the people who really NEED it verses those who just find it convenient.
Funny how that argument only works for you when it comes to luxuries you don't "approve" of, isn't it?
A luxury or convenience is just that, and you use plenty yourself.
Why on earth would rising gasoline prices and people switching to smaller vehicles make you "happy?" Why would you care?
And yes, the two are very comparable. You waste a LOT of energy on heating and cooling, and all your various gadgets that you do not NEED, but are convenient for you.
Yet, instead of worrying about yourself, you're too busy worrying about what other people are doing.
Why do I defend the right for others to drive large vehicles? Why not? They aren't bothering me. I'm not some busybody elitist who feels the need to dictate how other people spend their money.
