Desmond Tutu talks about Obama's AIDS policy

Status
Not open for further replies.

SLCentral

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2003
3,542
0
71
Interesting read...seems like Obama really needs to step up and do as he promised.

HAVING met President Obama, I’m confident that he’s a man of conscience who shares my commitment to bringing hope and care to the world’s poor. But I am saddened by his decision to spend less than he promised to treat AIDS patients in Africa.

George W. Bush made an impressive commitment to the international fight against AIDS when he formed the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief program. Since 2004, Pepfar has spent $19 billion to help distribute anti-viral treatments to about 2.5 million Africans infected with H.I.V.

Thanks to these efforts — and similar initiatives, like those spearheaded by the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria — the number of African patients with access to AIDS drugs jumped tenfold from 2003 to 2008. Since 2004, the AIDS-related mortality rate in sub-Saharan Africa has dropped 18 percent.

Yet President Obama added only $366 million to the program this year — well below the $1 billion per year he promised to add when he was on the campaign trail. (Pepfar’s total budget now stands at $7 billion.) Most of the countries in Pepfar will see no increase in aid.

Under the Bush administration, about 400,000 more African patients received treatment every year. President Obama’s Pepfar strategy would reduce the number of new patients receiving treatment to 320,000 — resulting in 1.2 million avoidable deaths over the next five years, according to calculations by two Harvard researchers, Rochelle Walensky and Daniel Kuritzkes. Doctors would have to decide which of the 22 million Africans afflicted with H.I.V. should receive treatment and which should not.

President Obama has also proposed to cut America’s contributions to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (which had been increasing each year since 2006) to $1 billion in 2011, down from $1.05 billion this year. The fund, less than a decade old, has spent nearly $20 billion helping treat the worst diseases of the developing world. And it has become the premier model for results-driven aid; financing for projects is supplied incrementally, as programs show tangible progress — for example, in the number of AIDS-treating drugs dispensed. President Obama’s plan to decrease support is deeply distressing; American financing for the fund should be increasing.

During my life, I’ve witnessed amazing advances in medical science. New treatments turn H.I.V. infection from a death sentence to a manageable illness. The cost of treating it is a small fraction of what it was 10 years ago. Meanwhile, more and more African nations have invested in the public health infrastructure needed to distribute AIDS drugs.

I appreciate that tough financial times require the United States government to cut spending. But scaling back America’s financial commitments to AIDS programs could wipe away decades of progress in Africa.

As the 18th International AIDS Conference is held this week in Vienna, President Obama should reconsider his commitment to fighting the disease. Surely the richest country on the planet can find the means to fight this scourge.
 

MJinZ

Diamond Member
Nov 4, 2009
8,192
0
0
Yay, 10x access to drugs, and only 18% reduction in AIDS deaths.

Awesome ROI.

Oh wait, we're in a depression.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
This is brutal, but if it's such an epidemic take all the HIV infected people and just kill them all. If we've( by we I mean the rest of the world ) has been pouring billions upon billions into Africa to control this and we've seen no results, it's about time for some drastic measures.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Why not spend a million dollars on condoms instead

that means people have to be responsible for their own actions.

Much more publicity in solving the underlying issue rather than the visual effects.
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
Why not spend a million dollars on condoms instead

Because that would annoy the Pope and all the other Christian fundies who believe that AIDS is God's righteous punishment for immoral sexual behavior.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
well below the $1 billion per year he promised to add when he was on the campaign trail.

Get used to Obama's broken promises Desy, we have.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
Wait... Obama got support promising other countries money? How the fuck did that happen? Like I said the time to deal with this the proper ways is drawing to an end. It's damn near time we just exterminate the problem once and for all. It's costing the world billions upon billions to fight a war that should easily be won. Lives are being lost and money poured down the drain, we might as well lose the lives while gaining something out of it like the extermination of HIV/AIDS in Africa.

Yes I'm condoning killing people, no I don't feel good about it.
 

DucatiMonster696

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2009
4,269
1
71
Because that would annoy the Pope and all the other Christian fundies who believe that AIDS is God's righteous punishment for immoral sexual behavior.

You think all that money actually makes its way down to the average guy and gal on the street in Africa? LOLOLOLOLOLO!!!!!!!!
 

Kirby

Lifer
Apr 10, 2006
12,028
2
0
Just one teaspoon of Super-AIDS in your butt and you're dead in three years.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Because that would annoy the Pope and all the other Christian fundies who believe that AIDS is God's righteous punishment for immoral sexual behavior.
Yes, G-d hates homosexuals and promiscuous straights - but not nearly as much as He hates hemophiliacs. Those hemophiliacs really chap G-d's butt. LOL

+1 on condoms and sex ed. Until African culture changes, all we're doing is keeping them healthy long enough to spread the disease to more people. Kudos to Bush for trying (albeit with OUR money, not his) but thank G-d Obama and the Dems haven't increased the rate of increase in the amount we send to Africa to maintain their infected population during these very hard times. Hell, I'd support cutting it back until times get better.
 

KMFJD

Lifer
Aug 11, 2005
33,652
54,000
136
Yes, G-d hates homosexuals and promiscuous straights - but not nearly as much as He hates hemophiliacs. Those hemophiliacs really chap G-d's butt. LOL

+1 on condoms and sex ed. Until African culture changes, all we're doing is keeping them healthy long enough to spread the disease to more people. Kudos to Bush for trying (albeit with OUR money, not his) but thank G-d Obama and the Dems haven't increased the rate of increase in the amount we send to Africa to maintain their infected population during these very hard times. Hell, I'd support cutting it back until times get better.

You hit the nail on the head....you can throw as much money at the problem as you want, it will not make a dent until the people start to change their ways
 
Status
Not open for further replies.