Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2013

[Tom]

Uhh are you reading what I'm reading?



So if the AG denies you a weapon you have 60 days to challenge his determination under section 922A or 922B.



In other words you get documents like this:

Which can 'suffice' according to this Bill. But wait! The court can view the original docs!



Well I guess they saved us American citizens from tyranny! but......




Are you sure you're reading the same thing I am? Cause what it looks like to me is the court can view all it wants but CANNOT rule on what they have seen.

The court's ruling can't directly rely on the classified documents. But they can see them to se if the redacted documents give a fair representation. If they don't no judge will admit the redacted docs.


Which would lead to a ruling in favor of the person seeking to buy a gun.

 

[NoStateofMind]

The court's ruling can't directly rely on the classified documents. But they can see them to se if the redacted documents give a fair representation. If they don't no judge will admit the redacted docs.


Which would lead to a ruling in favor of the person seeking to buy a gun.

In other words the court will have to rely on redacted docs no matter what the classified documents state. That sounds so much better.