Denial of Science when it doesn't conform to your persepctive

[Onceler]

We'll, sometimes the scientists are wrong, or the results are manipulated to get the desired result. I clearly remember studying the coming ice age when I was in junior high school, we had long discussions about how the human race would survive. They missed the boat on that one. Then global warming came along with it's unique set of problems and results that may or may not have been completely accurate, then they changed the name to "climate change", which sounds pretty vauge.
So it's not so much the science being denied, as the conclusions being questioned.
With climate change, the worst possible proponent was the the guy leading the charge. Al Gore personally took what may have been very solid science, and made it into a dog and pony show. His motivation was extremely questionable, and his never ending assertion that he was "carbon neutral" was such an absurd joke that it brought scorn and disbelief to the entire concept. So in this particular case, it wasn't so much the message that was denied, it's that the messenger made it sound like he was lying.

I remember that, they use to show us on the projector screen about how we are going to go through another ice age soon.
And I would rather have the superior genetically modified food.

 

[ThinClient]

I remember that, they use to show us on the projector screen about how we are going to go through another ice age soon.
And I would rather have the superior genetically modified food.

Either way, there's more evidence to support a scientific claim than there is to support ANY religious positive claim involving the supernatural, so why believe it?

 

[Onceler]

I believe it because of my personal experiences have led me to believe in it.