I did not know that. I think it is more or less common sense you prove who you are when doing anything important. I wouldn't want anyone voting who wasn't whom they say they are. But when I heard there was basically zero cases of voter ID fraud going on I realized it was a non-existent problem and stopped worrying about it. Let the states decide if they want it. And I recognize it's something Republicans are making a big deal about only because they feel it will at least somewhat disenfranchise low income and minority voters, who traditionally vote Democratic.
Yeah, this isn't a Democratic vs Republican issue for me at all. Trump isn't the friend of the lawful gun owner that he claims to be.
Here we go again, circular logic accomplishes what when it comes to gun violence?
Historically, just about everyone interested in tyranny and oppression was in favor of disarming those they demonized and arming those who would act as their army to accomplish their goals. And then when those goals were achieved it was time to disarm everyone other than themselves and their most loyal.
Owning a gun does not make you a murderer. In fact, way over 99.92% of guns in civilian hands are never used to hurt anyone intentionally or accidentally, let alone to murder. If you can't get that through your thick skull then we have nothing to discuss.
If you figure out how to disarm those who are causing those very problems, sign me up as willing to give up mine too. Just stop ignoring the fact that 99.9%+ of guns in civilians hands never hurt anyone intentionally or accidentally. You are trying to tell the lawful many that they need to disarm to stop the unlawful few when you don't even have a way to disarm those few.
That is a fucking lie. The overwhelmingly vast majority of gun owners do so safely and lawfully. You have no way to disarm criminals who are the actual problem by banning guns. Murder is already banned and we have a huge problem with criminals/sick/evil folks ignoring that ban.
I wish it were so, but realistically, shit ain't like that. I refuse to allow my life or the lives of my family (heck, even my friends and neighbors) to be placed at the mercy of anyone willing to ignore your proposed bans.
hahahaa, you keep on proving what everybody is thinking about you---you have gone over the deep end and have been totally TRIGGERED!!
And if someone needs to defend their life from a person with criminal negative feelings they stand much less of a chance of doing so than someone who does have a gun. And since 99.9%+ of guns in civilian hands never hurt anyone either accidentally or intentionally, why are you willing to allow the vast majority to risk harm in an impossible attempt to stop the criminal few? Who will just laugh at your ban on weapons the same way they ignore the ban on actual murder.
More insults, the cornerstone of a well though-out position in any debate.
You would likely have zero right to vote if that privilege hadn't been fought for and paid for in blood by an armed citizenry who stood up against a tyrannical government. Now say "thank you" and STFU since you obviously can't be counted on to do so again should it ever become necessary.
Where does telling people to shut the fuck up factor in to a well thought out position in a debate? Haha.
That's a stretch. Sounds like a sovereign citizen and their right to travel B.S. to ignore our laws. But you are really going to try to use the fact that we regulate a constitutional right (even if we agree that's what driving is, which it's not) that is subject to reasonable regulation as proof that you can basically ban a constitutional right that "...shall not be infringed?"
If you don't want to address the rest of my words from that post, I understand. I wouldn't want to reply to something I had no counter argument for either.
I literally already did when you wrote this, haha.
