Democrats try wooing white men

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
"Democrats appeal to four main groups - welfare, abortions, gun control and gays."

Republicans get way more welfare than democrats. Tax cuts for the rich under Bush? Medicare D(elderly, which is the republican base) under bush. Tons of corporate welfare and military giveaways, which are sacred to republicans.

Abortions were settled 40 years ago. It is only relevant to the extreme right, who want to keep it alive as a wedge voting issue for the nutjob wing of their base(you).

Gays? Interracial marriage. Women's rights. Desegregation. Conservatives have always been on the wrong sides of these issues. The country is changing. Time to get with the times. It is only an issue to rightwing extremists. Most people don't concern themselves with what gay males do in the bedroom, unlike you, who keeps obsessing.

Gun control? 1. This is a nonsense issue because gun rights overall continue to expand year after year, even under middle/right presidents like Obama. You get to keep your precious killing machines. You live in fear, which is why you need those kind of machines in the first place. The NRA keeps your fear alive, so it can get rich, along with gun/ammo manufacturers. Amazing how easy it is to keep conservatives living in fear of everything.

You are a really stupid fuck.....people who think like you are the primary reason our country is turning into a shit hole.
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Assuming those are gun manufacturers, it wouldn't be a plot twist at all. Recognizing insanity and making money of it just means that they are intelligent people. Gun lovers are lunatics, who live in constant fear and paranoia. They are fed an endless amount of nonsensical fear based propaganda and they buy it hook, line, and sinker.

So if I knew someone suffered from paranoid delusion, I would just be "intelligent" to sell them a variety of ineffectual protective devices like magic rocks, enchanted underwear, etc? What if they had down syndrome but had inherited a lot of money? Would I be good to go to take advantage of them too? I can't believe you're defending Obama, Biden & Feinstein's exploitation of people that you yourself admit are mentally ill. :thumbsdown:
 

TerryMathews

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,464
2
0
Assuming those are gun manufacturers, it wouldn't be a plot twist at all. Recognizing insanity and making money of it just means that they are intelligent people. Gun lovers are lunatics, who live in constant fear and paranoia. They are fed an endless amount of nonsensical fear based propaganda and they buy it hook, line, and sinker.

Ladies and gentlemen, the hypocrisy of the left.
 

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
They want to rope them in, because they are having a hard time finally killing them off.

1st they sent the ethnics, via home invasions, to finish off the straight white male. Those pesky gun rights put a damper on things,...

Then, they sent the rampaging sluts to lock the white male down with these stupid ideas of how he has to support the child he helped create (thems lady parts,... not mah respo,.. respons,.. res,... not mah problem!)

And, when a straight white male does finally find a submissive woman who will do what he says and had not had more scrappings than a fisherman's knuckles (and multicultural experiences,...), the homosexual* comes along and destroys the sanctity of marriage, by demanding he be married!!

* as per OP, lesbians are OK.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,422
32,934
136
At 35% of the population, white males are not the majority.

And, 35% of that 35% (at least the voters) placed their ballot for Obama.


Not all white males think like you do. Remember that the country is much bigger than just your area of the backwoods.

TH should be happy, that 35% of population controls over 90% of the wealth. They will still call most of the shots.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,880
4,991
136
They want to rope them in, because they are having a hard time finally killing them off.

1st they sent the ethnics, via home invasions, to finish off the straight white male. Those pesky gun rights put a damper on things,...

Then, they sent the rampaging sluts to lock the white male down with these stupid ideas of how he has to support the child he helped create (thems lady parts,... not mah respo,.. respons,.. res,... not mah problem!)

And, when a straight white male does finally find a submissive woman who will do what he says and had not had more scrappings than a fisherman's knuckles (and multicultural experiences,...), the homosexual* comes along and destroys the sanctity of marriage, by demanding he be married!!

* as per OP, lesbians are OK.

I almost thought you were serious.

You should maybe tone it down a bit...it's soooo over the top that it almost tips your hand.

Great parody, nonetheless!

:thumbsup::thumbsup:
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
198
106
These are profoundly stupid statements.

How are those stupid statements?

Gays, liberals, abortionist, people on welfare and low income earners are more likely to vote democrats than republican.

People who are turning away from the democrat party are working class families who honor core family values.

Numbers do not lie. The traditional head of the household, men, have been leaving the democrat party since the 1960s.
 

MrPickins

Diamond Member
May 24, 2003
9,125
792
126
How are those stupid statements?

Gays, liberals, abortionist, people on welfare and low income earners are more likely to vote democrats than republican.

You said:

One of the only reasons why low income families vote democrat is for welfare.

Democrats appeal to four main groups - welfare, abortions, gun control and gays.

The first statement is ignorant as all hell, and the second doesn't acknowledge those people who vote Democrat for the innumerable other reasons. Equality of gender/race/sexual orientation being a big one.


People who are turning away from the democrat party are working class families who honor core family values.

Numbers do not lie. The traditional head of the household, men, have been leaving the democrat party since the 1960s.

"Family values" is a term made up by the Christian Right that has no real meaning. The idealized family has never really existed. Life in the past was not like Leave it to Beaver.

May be NSFW (not sure about this episode, but they like teh nudity): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rU8-FkiWh4k
 
Last edited:

Exophase

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2012
4,439
9
81
How are those stupid statements?

Gays, liberals, abortionist, people on welfare and low income earners are more likely to vote democrats than republican.

Gay people, abortionists, those on welfare, and low income earners are more likely to vote democrat. Therefore, all people who vote democrat are gay, abortionist, on welfare, or low income earners (although incidentally you didn't even include this group before.. are white males excluded from low income earners? What's considered low income anyway? Not what you make, right?)

Thank you for this incredible leap of logic.

(I outright ignored the "liberals are more likely to vote democrat" part since that's a pretty empty statement)

People who are turning away from the democrat party are working class families who honor core family values.

Ah, so we have as two distinct groups the low income earners and the working class families. And I guess all those working class people honor core family values by never getting divorced, cheating on their spouse, and being model parents. Oh, I forgot, honoring values isn't about living your own life a certain way, it's about judging people for how they live theirs. I'd like to think that most people aren't so vapid as to think that letting gay people marry and women have abortions isn't an impediment to their own familial prospects but you're sad evidence that people can actually think this way.

Numbers do not lie. The traditional head of the household, men, have been leaving the democrat party since the 1960s.

So not white males anymore, just males? Still waiting to actually see these numbers, and of course over a long enough scale to show the trend all the way back into the 1960s. An article saying that the democrat party is trying to win favor with males does not statistics make.
 

MrPickins

Diamond Member
May 24, 2003
9,125
792
126
So not white males anymore, just males? Still waiting to actually see these numbers, and of course over a long enough scale to show the trend all the way back into the 1960s. An article saying that the democrat party is trying to win favor with males does not statistics make.

Don't bother, TH doesn't have any stats to back up his statements.

That won't stop him, though...
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,770
6,770
126
How are those stupid statements?

Gays, liberals, abortionist, people on welfare and low income earners are more likely to vote democrats than republican.

People who are turning away from the democrat party are working class families who honor core family values.

Numbers do not lie. The traditional head of the household, men, have been leaving the democrat party since the 1960s.

As I told you, men, since the 60's have become irrelevant. The real men became democrats and hippies while the asshole authoritarian patriarchal clingers on became conservatives. You are like a row boat anchor that fell off an ocean liner. You are a drag on progress, greatly magnified in your own imagination, but ultimately irrelevant. The world is evolving. The rights of women, of all manner of minorities and disempowered are claiming their place in the sum. The violent imposed power of the bully white male is being challenged on every front. Dick Cheney is despised. Only the brainwashed and backward, held back women what to have sex with you any more. You are angry and afraid to sink to the level of irrelevance you put others into. You always create what you fear. Now you get to eat it. You and the rest of the babbling monkey psychotic patriarchal males no longer have a harum of privilege over which to pompously officiate. You are a relic of the past, a sick and slimy reminder of a barbaric age. Enjoy your retirement. Go fawn over Putin and his fucked up post Soviet state. You'll be right at home. Don't forget to take of your shit and thump your chest, little guy.

Oops, I gotta go babysit my Niece's daughter and change some diapers while she has her hair colored. Later, tough guy.

Note to myself: I really should learn to do hair.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,770
6,770
126
Don't bother, TH doesn't have any stats to back up his statements.

That won't stop him, though...

Here's the lesson I learned from that:

A bigot is a bigot because of our human capacity to feel disgust. We retch when eat something rotten and will never tough it again in a lifetime as an evolutionary evolved survival mechanism. Our capacity to experience revulsion is built in, but, unlike animals who also have such a capacity, ours can be stimulated by the imagination. All that parents have to do, and do, to control children and make them conform, all ostensibly, of course, for their own good, is to make them feel sick at any behavior not on the conformist approved list. By putting the child down and making him feel disgust at certain natural human behaviors, the child is rendered mentally ill. He grows up hating whatever his parents and his culture terrified his or her mind with. In short, we grow up with self loathing, wishing never again to offend by showing any similarity to that horrible other.

So, because the bigot is animated by self disgust and will not admit to having any relationship to what disgusts him even though it's really himself, the bigot becomes what he fears, his bigotry itself becomes offensive to others who are not sick. The sick are one of the first things our evolved survival instinct is able to be disgusted by. So healthy people are naturally disgusted by bigots and that makes us very much the same as them.

So since I am for all intents and purposes bigoted against bigots naturally and not in an unhealthy manner, and since you can't really stop a bigot from being a bigot, I don't stop myself either. I just lay it out there and tell bigots how disgusting they are and they aren't going to stop me either. If the bigots what to bully other people with their asinine bigotry, they can get ready for me.
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
"Democrats appeal to four main groups - welfare, abortions, gun control and gays."

Republicans get way more welfare than democrats. Tax cuts for the rich under Bush? Medicare D(elderly, which is the republican base) under bush. Tons of corporate welfare and military giveaways, which are sacred to republicans.

Abortions were settled 40 years ago. It is only relevant to the extreme right, who want to keep it alive as a wedge voting issue for the nutjob wing of their base(you).

Gays? Interracial marriage. Women's rights. Desegregation. Conservatives have always been on the wrong sides of these issues. The country is changing. Time to get with the times. It is only an issue to rightwing extremists. Most people don't concern themselves with what gay males do in the bedroom, unlike you, who keeps obsessing.

Gun control? 1. This is a nonsense issue because gun rights overall continue to expand year after year, even under middle/right presidents like Obama. You get to keep your precious killing machines. You live in fear, which is why you need those kind of machines in the first place. The NRA keeps your fear alive, so it can get rich, along with gun/ammo manufacturers. Amazing how easy it is to keep conservatives living in fear of everything.

This is a fantastic analysis of the way many conservatives think, essentially not being able to see past their nose, forest for the trees, etc.

Though I disagree with your followup post on Dems taking financial advantage of gun holdings (whether it's true they hold those stocks I have no idea).
 

laviathan05

Member
Mar 26, 2009
53
0
0
This thread is a perfect example of how the two-party system has essentially obstructed America's view on how the government works. You're all arguing about which side is better "I'm team Edward" and "I'm team Jacob", when in reality both sides are controlled by the same corporate entities (for the most part). The political system that we have today is what will be the downfall of our country, not the white males or the minorities or the LGBT community. Open your eyes to who is really controlling the country.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,770
6,770
126
This thread is a perfect example of how the two-party system has essentially obstructed America's view on how the government works. You're all arguing about which side is better "I'm team Edward" and "I'm team Jacob", when in reality both sides are controlled by the same corporate entities (for the most part). The political system that we have today is what will be the downfall of our country, not the white males or the minorities or the LGBT community. Open your eyes to who is really controlling the country.

Why are you posting here instead of working to start a constitutional convention? There is one party that may be amenable to a populist revolt and one that can't be affected by reason. Science has identified which those are.
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
You are a really stupid fuck.....people who think like you are the primary reason our country is turning into a shit hole.

Cry about it a bit.

You have no argument, which is why you turn to insults... like a child would.
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
How are those stupid statements?

Gays, liberals, abortionist, people on welfare and low income earners are more likely to vote democrats than republican.

People who are turning away from the democrat party are working class families who honor core family values.

Numbers do not lie. The traditional head of the household, men, have been leaving the democrat party since the 1960s.

How about looking up the numbers then.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012...ivides-democrats-republicans-and-independents

As of now, Democrats are more than Republicans at all income levels.

There is no such thing as "core family values" btw.

Also, the "traditional" head of household means nothing since Women have been in the workforce for well over 30 years now. You can live in the past or you could get with the times.
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
So if I knew someone suffered from paranoid delusion, I would just be "intelligent" to sell them a variety of ineffectual protective devices like magic rocks, enchanted underwear, etc? What if they had down syndrome but had inherited a lot of money? Would I be good to go to take advantage of them too? I can't believe you're defending Obama, Biden & Feinstein's exploitation of people that you yourself admit are mentally ill. :thumbsdown:

1. I'd like to see evidence of "investment" of those 3, which has yet to be shown.

2. Investing in something exploits no one.

3. The companies that make guns/ammo, along with the NRA, as well as the right wing fear machine, are the ones responsible for making money off the fools that they specifically target.
 

MrPickins

Diamond Member
May 24, 2003
9,125
792
126
How about looking up the numbers then.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012...ivides-democrats-republicans-and-independents

As of now, Democrats are more than Republicans at all income levels.

There is no such thing as "core family values" btw.

Also, the "traditional" head of household means nothing since Women have been in the workforce for well over 30 years now. You can live in the past or you could get with the times.

Ya, and there are more independents than democrats or republicans.

Which is why I lol so hard at the far right and far left arguing in this forum. Each thinks they represent the common man, but the truth is neither do completely.
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
Ya, and there are more independents than democrats or republicans.

Which is why I lol so hard at the far right and far left arguing in this forum. Each thinks they represent the common man, but the truth is neither do completely.

There is no left, let alone "far left" when it comes to US politics. Just the middle/right democrats(further to the right than the right wing of every other first world country) and then off the cliff republicans.