• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Democrats to fence (wall) off convention center

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Knowing said:
Glad we could work that out. So now what's Hillary's problem with giving a simple straightforward answer?

I guess I haven't seen any laws on the books requiring membership in a militant group to purchase or operate firearms that would serve as evidence that the collective right interpretation ever mattered.
Click to expand...

Well maybe she doesn't agree, there is certainly ample legal support for differing opinions on the matter.

As for whether or not it mattered in the past, it appears to have been a basis for circuit court decisions in the past as to the constitutionality of various firearms restrictions. That sure sounds like it matters to me, or at least it presumably mattered to the litigants.
 
Knowing said:
Glad we could work that out. So now what's Hillary's problem with giving a simple straightforward answer?

I guess I haven't seen any laws on the books requiring membership in a militant group to purchase or operate firearms that would serve as evidence that the collective right interpretation ever mattered.
Click to expand...

Very gracious how you admitted to learning something.

Oh, I spoke too soon. You didn't.

You lived down to my expectations.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top