Democrats huge HUGE risk

[Moonbeam]

So, one pro-Trump thread says Democrats are terrified that he could be President. Another pro-Trump thread says that Democrats are complacent and don't expect him to have a chance. You Trump guys need to get together and straighten out the message you want to send.

I see Dems doing the same thing. We're going to slaughter him, we're going to lose. When it's all over I'll know which of all the fantasies that went through my head I actually believed but I'm not ready to commit just yet because I just hate to be wrong.

 

[UglyCasanova]

I'm a subscriber and avid reader of the NYT and I can tell they lean a certain way on issues but the stories are top notch so I keep paying. One thing I've noticed in this debacle though is very few stories regarding the DNC email leak, not prominent (except right now about her stepping down), and the big thing is they aren't allowing comments on it. They pick and choose what stories can have comments or not, but so far as I've seen none of the DNC leak stories are allowing user comments. Interesting to say the least...

 

[Knowing]

So, one pro-Trump thread says Democrats are terrified that he could be President. Another pro-Trump thread says that Democrats are complacent and don't expect him to have a chance. You Trump guys need to get together and straighten out the message you want to send.

temporary image hosting

The left never talks out of both sides of their mouths at the same time.

 

[trenchfoot]

I'm a subscriber and avid reader of the NYT and I can tell they lean a certain way on issues but the stories are top notch so I keep paying. One thing I've noticed in this debacle though is very few stories regarding the DNC email leak, not prominent (except right now about her stepping down), and the big thing is they aren't allowing comments on it. They pick and choose what stories can have comments or not, but so far as I've seen none of the DNC leak stories are allowing user comments. Interesting to say the least...

Moneyed interests know which side of their bread is buttered on it seems.

IMO, even if Clinton is in bed with Wall Street, her administration will get the middle class and the poor a few more crumbs that a Trump admin. will because of how unexpectedly popular Sanders was with the message he was delivering in his campaign.

Hillary will have to bend a little more in Sander's direction despite the strenuous but silent objections she'll get/been getting from her chummies on Wall St.

With the release of those DNC emails out in the wild, it gives Sanders and Warren that much more leverage to have their priorities taken care of.

 

[flexy]

She will need to bend FAR.

Without the support of (the many) Sanders folks, she'll lose. We're at a point that many Sanders supporters vowed to never, ever vote for her...and things get only worse. We're NOT at a point anymore where it was "very clear" that Clinton would win, even with my anti-Trump stance I have to admit this!

Things right now (including past things like the FBI investigation), every terrorist attack etc. does NOT work in Clinton's favour. TBH, I wouldn't be surprised when in only a few months that person turns out truly non-electable, which for those opposing her vehemently she already is.

-- Some looked at Sanders some months ago calling him and supporters idiots when they pointed out that the system is rigged. Now those and everyone has it in writing: the system IS rigged. And yet, ironically, those who got screwed over are now being asked to support those who screwed them over. Much luck with that.

-- And by the way, the awful DWS doesn't realize that she better step down NOW...not "after the convention". Every day she stays on there means lost votes, and I don't think Clinton can afford that.

 

[TheGardener]

Progressives don't mind rigged elections, so Hillary can discount them. After all, don't they worship at the heels of socialist dictators like Castro and Chavez? Show Hillary your love.

Besides Hillary went after Obama for his religion in 2008. Remember Rev Wright? Why should should she not play dirty with the Bern? She is very transparent, when she gets caught.

 

[flexy]

New poll:

Trump LEADS.

http://us.cnn.com/2016/07/25/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-poll/index.html

 

[leper84]

This time, Republicans never talks about family values, because U.S. probably will have a President who operate casinos, how ironic.

Winning is everything. Racist, bigotry is nothing.

I know, right?

"OMG! She sent a package via Fed-Ex instead of USPS! Lock her up!"
Yeah, much ado about nothing.

Thats a pretty ridiculous comparison. But hey, its proven her server was hacked, so if you're comfortable with Top Secret classified information basically being handed to the enemy, vote for (C)linton.

 

[TeeJay1952]

I know, right?

Thats a pretty ridiculous comparison. But hey, its proven her server was hacked, so if you're comfortable with Top Secret classified information basically being handed to the enemy, vote for (C)linton.

OK

 

[ivwshane]

I know, right?

Thats a pretty ridiculous comparison. But hey, its proven her server was hacked, so if you're comfortable with Top Secret classified information basically being handed to the enemy, vote for (C)linton.

Her server was hacked? You should call the FBI with the info only you appear to have because they couldn't find any indication that her server was hacked.

 

[leper84]

Her server was hacked? You should call the FBI with the info only you appear to have because they couldn't find any indication that her server was hacked.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/29/hillary-clintons-emails-in-vladimir-putins-hands/

A State Department official has said Russia is one of at least three foreign governments likely to have obtained the full content of the former secretary of state’s server through covert hacking operations. The other two are China and Israel.

Any indication huh?

You guys just don't even care about reality if it doesn't meet your agenda, huh?

 

[ivwshane]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/29/hillary-clintons-emails-in-vladimir-putins-hands/



Any indication huh?

You guys just don't even care about reality if it doesn't meet your agenda, huh?

Did you even read your own link you stupid fuck?! Did you even read my post? Did you even remember what you wrote?

Indication? Lol, goal post moved!

 

[sm625]

Clearly the corporate media is in favor of Hillary. There will not be any discussion of what was actually said by Trump. If they dont like something, they encapsulate it into a single word, and then parrot that word far and wide. In this case, that word is "dark". This election is about one thing and one thing only: How deep is their control? How adept will they be at sending out memes, like this "dark" meme? And how many people are dumb enough to actually buy it?

 

[Jaskalas]

Wonder which DNC staffer coordinated the Media headlines to hate dark people.

 

[Sonikku]

Sith are people too. :'(

 

[werepossum]

No tea leaves required. Hillary will handily lose by a landslide.

Hillary may lose, but certainly not by a landslide.

 

[leper84]

Did you even read your own link you stupid fuck?

Hey man, don't get all mad and drop your tendies cause you didn't like that link. Plenty more if you google it.

Did you even read my post? Did you even remember what you wrote?

Indication? Lol, goal post moved!

Yeah, about that...

Her server was hacked? You should call the FBI with the info only you appear to have because they couldn't find any indication that her server was hacked.

So is that dishonesty or stupidity?