Democrats are planning to give seniors $250 check

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Budmantom

Lifer
Aug 17, 2002
13,103
1
81
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101019/ap_on_bi_ge/us_social_security_bonus



So the US is dead broke and this administration and Democrats are planning to dig the hole even deeper so they can tell the seniors that they truly deeply care about their votes..errrr..them? D:

If this administration and Democrats care about seniors so much, why don't they give the money out of their own pockets? Plenty of Democrat lawmakers are wealthy.

<<---waiting to hear about ..."but..but..but..Bussssshhhhh" excuses in 3....2....1... :)

$250 for a vote is cheap.....
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
I really didn't expect rightwingers to be opposed to this. Seriously guys? This is a drop in the bucket and will help seniors, people who everybody agrees have earned their retirement.


If they earned their retirement, they wouldnt be asking for more money.


And seriously, seniors who are still affected by a rent increase, did something completely wrong.
 

PeshakJang

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2010
2,276
0
0
If they earned their retirement, they wouldnt be asking for more money.


And seriously, seniors who are still affected by a rent increase, did something completely wrong.

You're just a racist who hates old black people. $15 billion is pocket change... it's insignificant... we could literally write checks for $15 billion every day for a year and since $15 billion is a drop in the bucket, it wouldn't matter one bit.

You racist.
 

Ldir

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2003
2,184
0
0
If they earned their retirement, they wouldnt be asking for more money.


And seriously, seniors who are still affected by a rent increase, did something completely wrong.

You are clueless. Millions of seniors live on fixed incomes. If it's not a rent increase it's property taxes. Their expenses go up either way.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
You are clueless. Millions of seniors live on fixed incomes. If it's not a rent increase it's property taxes. Their expenses go up either way.

And if they are they're doing it wrong and didn't plan for their retirement. that's the point. Let them eat cat food for all I care, that's the price of stupidity, it has to hurt otherwise people would keep making stupid decisions. By taking away the consequences of stupidity you encourage more of it.

The government is not the provider of life or sustenance to free people.
 

Ldir

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2003
2,184
0
0
And if they are they're doing it wrong and didn't plan for their retirement. that's the point. Let them eat cat food for all I care, that's the price of stupidity, it has to hurt otherwise people would keep making stupid decisions. By taking away the consequences of stupidity you encourage more of it.

The government is not the provider of life or sustenance to free people.

The irony of you calling others stupid. You are hateful scum. I look forward to the day karma finds you.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
The irony of you calling others stupid. You are hateful scum. I look forward to the day karma finds you.

So believing in personal responsibility and liberty makes me scum? Funny, where I live that makes me an American Patriot.

Let me guess, you aren't managing your retirement properly.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
So believing in personal responsibility and liberty makes me scum? Funny, where I live that makes me an American Patriot.

Let me guess, you aren't managing your retirement properly.
Just curious... do you believe in "limited liability" then?
 

Ldir

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2003
2,184
0
0
So believing in personal responsibility and liberty makes me scum? Funny, where I live that makes me an American Patriot.

Let me guess, you aren't managing your retirement properly.

You sound like some know it all punk who still lives at home. You live in a delusion disconnected from the real world and real people with real problems. You hate on them because you have no clue what the real world is like. You are a patriot in your own head. I work for a living. I am at least 40 years from retirement.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
You sound like some know it all punk who still lives at home. You live in a delusion disconnected from the real world and real people with real problems. You hate on them because you have no clue what the real world is like. You are a patriot in your own head. I work for a living. I am at least 40 years from retirement.

Then you had better start doing more to save for your retirement. I'm 39 and will likely retire before 54. I've been through a whole hell of a lot and so dirt poor I didn't know if I could eat. All it takes is some hard work to live a pretty decent life. I have plenty of clue of real life problems and am going to make damn sure my decisions don't lead to those problems.

Personal responsibility and individual liberty. Live it, learn it, love it.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
Then you had better start doing more to save for your retirement. I'm 39 and will likely retire before 54. I've been through a whole hell of a lot and so dirt poor I didn't know if I could eat. All it takes is some hard work to live a pretty decent life. I have plenty of clue of real life problems and am going to make damn sure my decisions don't lead to those problems.

Personal responsibility and individual liberty. Live it, learn it, love it.

It's not physically possible for everybody to make enough money to retire at 54. That's just the way a real economy is. There are rich and there are middle class and there are poor. Unless you're advocating some kind of socialism.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
It's not physically possible for everybody to make enough money to retire at 54. That's just the way a real economy is. There are rich and there are middle class and there are poor. Unless you're advocating some kind of socialism.

Some professions in Greece retire at 54. I hear that country is doing well, it's certainly a case study in the benefits of socialism.
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
This points out what is so wrong with entitlements.

Social Security INSURANCE isn't an entitlement, it's inusrance that's been bought and paid for. It's not the old people's fault that all the politicians raid the trust fund.

And to the idiots claiming this is buying votes. LOL, the D's lost more votes by not doing something about no cost of living increase for two years then they will ever gain doing a one time measley $250 payment.

If a SS recipient is getting $12,500 a year and didn't get a 2% COLA that he should of had, that's $250 a year, every year for the rest of his life he is missing out on. Now they did it again? That's $500/year they are being cheated out of while the cost of food and medicie keeps going up. LOL some bribe. WoooHooo!! Let the votes poor in!! DUHHH!!
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
Then you had better start doing more to save for your retirement. I'm 39 and will likely retire before 54. I've been through a whole hell of a lot and so dirt poor I didn't know if I could eat. All it takes is some hard work to live a pretty decent life. I have plenty of clue of real life problems and am going to make damn sure my decisions don't lead to those problems.

Personal responsibility and individual liberty. Live it, learn it, love it.

Shit, you're just a kid living at home withe your father, the MD.
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,585
3,796
126
Some professions in Greece retire at 54. I hear that country is doing well, it's certainly a case study in the benefits of socialism.

Don't forget that people with hazardous jobs like hairdresser and newscaster get to retire at 50
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,976
141
106
and in other news:NEW YORK (Reuters) - Fannie Mae (OTC BB:FNMA.OB - News) and Freddie Mac (OTC BB:FMCC.OB - News) may need as much as $215 billion in additional capital from the Treasury through 2013 to offset losses and maintain a positive net worth, their federal regulator said on Thursday. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, whose programs fund the lion's share of all new home loans, are at the center of debate as Congress sets to overhaul a U.S. mortgage finance system that contributed to the worst housing crisis since the 1930s.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
And if they are they're doing it wrong and didn't plan for their retirement. that's the point. Let them eat cat food for all I care, that's the price of stupidity, it has to hurt otherwise people would keep making stupid decisions. By taking away the consequences of stupidity you encourage more of it.

The government is not the provider of life or sustenance to free people.



Our seniors are some of the hardest working most dedicated people this country has ever had. Todays younger generation doesn't even come close to being willing to do the things that our current seniors did to survive. I know people like to joke about stories older people tell about how hard life was for them, but some of them are true. I know my dad plowed fields using a mule and hauled trees to a nearby mill on a cart with his dad to build my grandmothers house. My dad was born legally blind but he didn't sit on his ass and try to claim support from the government. He joined the army and worked for over 50 years , all the while never taking one cent from the government but paying his share into social security the entire time. Todays generation wants to sit on the couch and have everything handed to them and throws a tantrum if they don't get it. If you took the current generation and placed them in society 50 years ago they would all starve to death because they wouldn't be willing to do what needs to be done to live. THAT is what needs to be fixed, seniors are NOT the problem with this country.
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,585
3,796
126
If you took the current generation and placed them in society 50 years ago they would all starve to death because they wouldn't be willing to do what needs to be done to live. THAT is what needs to be fixed, seniors are NOT the problem with this country.

While I am not exactly sure what generation you are referring to some of us work very hard to get where we have gotten and would appriciate not being lumped in with the very lazy rest of the generation

That said - Seniors are THE obstacle for SS reform. It's a broken system but seniors make it political suicide for anyone to try true reform. We can't have anyone touching any of 'their money' even though that means I will never see all of 'my money'. I get their bitching about paying into the system - I really do. The thing is that their bitching and refusal to allow reform is going to prevent ME from seeing all of the money that I paid into the system. It's the hypocrisy and insistence on passing on their problems to the next generation that really gets me
 

Ldir

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2003
2,184
0
0
While I am not exactly sure what generation you are referring to some of us work very hard to get where we have gotten and would appriciate not being lumped in with the very lazy rest of the generation

That said - Seniors are THE obstacle for SS reform. It's a broken system but seniors make it political suicide for anyone to try true reform. We can't have anyone touching any of 'their money' even though that means I will never see all of 'my money'. I get their bitching about paying into the system - I really do. The thing is that their bitching and refusal to allow reform is going to prevent ME from seeing all of the money that I paid into the system. It's the hypocrisy and insistence on passing on their problems to the next generation that really gets me

It is only broken because Congress can't keep its hands off SS money. Fix that and the rest of SS only needs a few tweaks.
 
Last edited:

Mursilis

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2001
7,756
11
81
It is only broken because Congress can't keep its hands off SS money. Fix that and the rest of SS only needs a few tweaks.

Not true - it's also broken because many people reap from SS far in excess of what they sowed. Seniors spout on and on about "paying in", but SS doesn't stop once your own contribution (and interest) is fully depleted.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Our seniors are some of the hardest working most dedicated people this country has ever had. Todays younger generation doesn't even come close to being willing to do the things that our current seniors did to survive. I know people like to joke about stories older people tell about how hard life was for them, but some of them are true. I know my dad plowed fields using a mule and hauled trees to a nearby mill on a cart with his dad to build my grandmothers house. My dad was born legally blind but he didn't sit on his ass and try to claim support from the government. He joined the army and worked for over 50 years , all the while never taking one cent from the government but paying his share into social security the entire time. Todays generation wants to sit on the couch and have everything handed to them and throws a tantrum if they don't get it. If you took the current generation and placed them in society 50 years ago they would all starve to death because they wouldn't be willing to do what needs to be done to live. THAT is what needs to be fixed, seniors are NOT the problem with this country.

Very well said. Had politicians set up an actual retirement plan rather than a Ponzi scheme, Social Security would be solvent today as regular investments over a person's working life (by SS design roughly forty-seven years) pay off quite well.
 

PeshakJang

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2010
2,276
0
0
According to Harry Reid last week...

there&#8217;s plenty of money in that trust fund account.

...

for the next 35 years, everyone will get all the money they want. Even after that, it takes minor tinkering to take care of it in the out years.

...

Social Security will pay out 100 percent of its benefits for the next 35 to 40 years.

I guess nothing is wrong!
 

Balt

Lifer
Mar 12, 2000
12,673
482
126
Very well said. Had politicians set up an actual retirement plan rather than a Ponzi scheme, Social Security would be solvent today as regular investments over a person's working life (by SS design roughly forty-seven years) pay off quite well.

The very same people who scream every time SS reform was or is even mentioned are the ones now complaining. No sympathy for them.

The younger generations didn't put dopes in office, they're just the ones who are going to get stuck with the bill.