Democratic debate? 1/17

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
I thought Bernie did well. Bernie had passion while Hillary seemed arrogant.

I guess powerful women are usually labeled as arrogant.
I mean, Trump isn't arrogant, right?
Christie? No, no arrogance there.
Jeb? His arrogance was this running for president thing expecting to be a cakewalk.
Cruz? Only arrogant should the rules apply to him.

No. Hillary is not arrogant. She's just the woman with a B. ;)
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,616
17,191
136
I guess powerful women are usually labeled as arrogant.
I mean, Trump isn't arrogant, right?
Christie? No, no arrogance there.
Jeb? His arrogance was this running for president thing expecting to be a cakewalk.
Cruz? Only arrogant should the rules apply to him.

No. Hillary is not arrogant. She's just the woman with a B. ;)

The funny thing is that Hillary should be arrogant, she's worked hard and has accomplished quite a bit as a politician.

Her arrogance doesn't bother me, then again I can overlook personality so long as they have good policies.
 

shady28

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2004
2,520
397
126
On Berniecare (Medicare for all) -



81% of Democrats either favor it or strongly favor it. 52% of Democrats *strongly* favor it.

Only 15% oppose it ( strongly + not strongly oppose).

So his healthcare plan is a winner within the Democratic party.


298a95a8b684e13205f793a04ec3e8653cc51fb9.png
 

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126
What has Hillary accomplished?

Pretends to be for the people when she needs to then goes back to her corporate ways,

Maybe Sanders will wake up right now and realize who and what he is dealing with,because he sure didn't when he defended her in that last debate.
 

bozack

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2000
7,913
12
81
On Berniecare (Medicare for all) -



81% of Democrats either favor it or strongly favor it. 52% of Democrats *strongly* favor it.

Only 15% oppose it ( strongly + not strongly oppose).

So his healthcare plan is a winner within the Democratic party.


298a95a8b684e13205f793a04ec3e8653cc51fb9.png

Is this a surprise? I get the sense from my leftist friends, especially those who are second generation in this country, that the ACA didn't go nearly far enough and they would much prefer what their families are used to with a full single payer system.

I can't help but think Sander's numbers are off and it will cost folks a good deal more, also it will most likely greatly limit choice, and there will be a number of powerful groups working against the plan...plus good luck getting it through congress....
 

shady28

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2004
2,520
397
126
Is this a surprise? I get the sense from my leftist friends, especially those who are second generation in this country, that the ACA didn't go nearly far enough and they would much prefer what their families are used to with a full single payer system.

I can't help but think Sander's numbers are off and it will cost folks a good deal more, also it will most likely greatly limit choice, and there will be a number of powerful groups working against the plan...plus good luck getting it through congress....


I'm not a leftist and I would prefer that it be left up to the individual.

Realizing that is not going to happen, single payer is far more preferable than forcing people to buy insurance. Single payer will likely be slight extra cost to me with a household income of ~170k. In exchange for that cost, I don't have to worry about what happens to my healthcare if I become unemployed. That's acceptable.

But Obamacare is a sham that mostly hurts the people who advocated it - young people and the poor. It's typical smoke and mirrors DC bullshit.

My stepson makes ~24k and it negatively impacts his finances far more than me, even though I pay more than double what he does. He pays about 6% of his income for healthcare, I pay about 1.8% - which I was paying anyway. I'm at an age where I need healthcare insurance, he really isn't and would likely be fine for the next 10 years with nothing more than major medical, you know the kind that you can't buy anymore.

Plus since Obamacare doesn't cover everyone, only those who pay, it leaves out large swaths of the population. It has essentially become a tax.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,455
33,160
136
Is this a surprise? I get the sense from my leftist friends, especially those who are second generation in this country, that the ACA didn't go nearly far enough and they would much prefer what their families are used to with a full single payer system.

I can't help but think Sander's numbers are off and it will cost folks a good deal more, also it will most likely greatly limit choice, and there will be a number of powerful groups working against the plan...plus good luck getting it through congress....
Because it is absolutely retarded that we are one of the only first-world nations without universal healthcare. Zorkorist defines "freedom" as "beholden to the medical and medical insurance industry."
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
Overall what I hear from Sanders is a bunch of ideological positions that play well to the base, but have no chance of becoming reality if he got elected.

When none of his ideas go anywhere once sworn in, what does he do? It's he really a guy that could win two terms?

Bernie seems like a left wing version of Ron Paul. Ideological hardliner on a few key issues, then little depth outside of that. Little regard for realpolitik.
 
Last edited:

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,455
33,160
136
Overall what I hear from Sanders is a bunch of ideological positions that play well to the base, but have no chance of becoming reality if he got elected.

When none of his ideas go anywhere once sworn in, what does he do? It's he really a guy that could win two terms?

Bernie seems like a left wing version of Ron Paul. Ideological hardliner on a few key issues, then little depth outside of that. Little regard for realpolitik.
I am hoping his ability to mobilize the young voters helps sweep the Democrats into a position to actually accomplish something, but I know that is probably pie-in-the-sky.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
I am hoping his ability to mobilize the young voters helps sweep the Democrats into a position to actually accomplish something, but I know that is probably pie-in-the-sky.

I suspect Bernie could do what Ron Paul did to the Republicans. Fracture the party. There is an under current of voters who are sick of the status quo from both parties. Sanders energizes it on the left. Ron Paul energized it on the right.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Looks like Bernie Sanders can help the Republican Congress with the Replace part of Repeal and Replace.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,908
4,940
136
[/B]

because that's equally as (in)effective as an AWB.

the biggest things that would address gun violence in the US IMO are making mental healthcare more accessible and less socially stigmatizing

Sounds like higher taxes/premiums to me. Reagan just threw them out on the street and saved us a bundle. :colbert:
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,405
136
Sounds like higher taxes/premiums to me. Reagan just threw them out on the street and saved us a bundle. :colbert:

Yes and no for the time Reagan's decision was right. The thing that really prompted action was Geraldo Rivera he had several reports like this one where the mental institutions were essentially a bunch of locked rooms where people were left to rot. While the operator of the Institution collected State & Federal money.

http://geraldo.com/page/willowbrook

But yes we've taken the not institutionalizing people who cannot care for themselves a bit too far.
 
Last edited:

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,616
17,191
136
If you want to be taken serious about limiting something. You should learn about what you want banned.

And if you want to be taken seriously you should probably stop assuming you know what everyone else wants.;)
 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,359
4,640
136
Overall what I hear from Sanders is a bunch of ideological positions that play well to the base, but have no chance of becoming reality if he got elected.

When none of his ideas go anywhere once sworn in, what does he do? It's he really a guy that could win two terms?

Bernie seems like a left wing version of Ron Paul. Ideological hardliner on a few key issues, then little depth outside of that. Little regard for realpolitik.

A Sanders Presidency would not be about getting things passed it would be about having a honest conversation with the American public about the things that need to be done. Sanders entered this race to talk about the problems not to win. If he should win he will use his pulpit to continue the conversation.

Practically everyone agrees that we need to flush the toilet that Washington politics has become and it has to start with someone pointing out all the turds floating in the bowl.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,616
17,191
136
A Sanders Presidency would not be about getting things passed it would be about having a honest conversation with the American public about the things that need to be done. Sanders entered this race to talk about the problems not to win. If he should win he will use his pulpit to continue the conversation.

Practically everyone agrees that we need to flush the toilet that Washington politics has become and it has to start with someone pointing out all the turds floating in the bowl.

Agreed. He has said on the campaign trail that it's not about him, it's a movement. If you vote for him and then vote for more Republican obstruction or a Democrat of simular mind, you will be wasting your time and you should have zero expectations.