Factcheck does all the legwork including verifying claims with campaign staff and examining studies and figures quoted by candidates. Cited statistical analysis sources are gibberish to me and I suspect to most people.
Factcheck's independent take on Clinton's debate claims:
Hillary's High-Stepping
October 31, 2007
The Democratic front-runner bobs and weaves at a candidate debate in Philadelphia.
Summary
At a Democratic debate in Philadelphia, Sen. Hillary Clinton ducked some questions and gave misleading answers to others.
1. She falsely implied that the reason White House documents about her communications with her husband haven't been released is due to bureaucratic delays, and she avoided saying whether she would ask Bill Clinton to clear their release from the National Archives.
2. She avoided a yes-or-no answer to whether she supports giving New York driver's licenses to illegal immigrants and at one point denied saying the idea made sense, when in fact she said less than two weeks earlier that it "makes a lot of sense."
3. She avoided saying what, if anything, she would do about Social Security taxes or benefits, saying a commission should study the system "if" it has problems, and saying that acting as though the troubled system is in "crisis" is "a Republican trap."
Full article here:
http://www.factcheck.org/elect...rys_high-stepping.html
The Daily Show also did a bit the other night about how she was on the fence on each answer. I think as the front runner she's trying to play it safe, but I think she's playing it TOO safe. I doubt this will hurt her very much, but it still doesn't look good to not articulate a clear position on a host of issues.