Democrat Bernie Sanders proposes VA fix bill

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Its almost like things cost money. Are you not smart enough to understand this simple concept unless it is repeated to you by Foxnews?

Sure it costs money. But how much? The VA's budget has gone up 235% since 2001. How much more does it need to go up before it stops the corruption within the agency?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,288
136
Sure it costs money. But how much? The VA's budget has gone up 235% since 2001. How much more does it need to go up before it stops the corruption within the agency?

Actually, in constant 2011 dollars, the VA budget approximately doubled from 2001 to 2012 (the most recent inflation adjusted figures I could find.) Not 235%. Additionally the number of VA enrolled patients has increased by about 60%. Notably, the patients that joined during this time generally have far larger medical needs than those who were patients before 2001, for obvious reasons.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,288
136
Sure it costs money. But how much? The VA's budget has gone up 235% since 2001. How much more does it need to go up before it stops the corruption within the agency?

I've found a better answer:

According to Vox VA per-patient funding has been increasing at a rate a little lower than health care inflation has been happening. So while VA funding is growing, they are in fact losing ground.

http://www.vox.com/2014/6/6/5786104/three-charts-that-show-the-va-is-badly-overloaded
 

TerryMathews

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,464
2
0
I've found a better answer:

According to Vox VA per-patient funding has been increasing at a rate a little lower than health care inflation has been happening. So while VA funding is growing, they are in fact losing ground.

http://www.vox.com/2014/6/6/5786104/three-charts-that-show-the-va-is-badly-overloaded

The question is, if the employees are turning in reports that indicate they are staffed sufficiently (in order to receive their bonuses), who's fault is it?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,288
136
The question is, if the employees are turning in reports that indicate they are staffed sufficiently (in order to receive their bonuses), who's fault is it?

This isn't about whether or not the VA is at fault, as they clearly are. It's just that the idea that they are awash in funding is incorrect.
 

TerryMathews

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,464
2
0
This isn't about whether or not the VA is at fault, as they clearly are. It's just that the idea that they are awash in funding is incorrect.

By your own facts, the funding was raised in line with inflation-maybe a little low but that's what you do when you're looking at productivity reports that say you're adequately staffed.

Eskimo, I know you like to blame Congress as much as possible. Sometimes, its well deserved. In this case however, the VA is responsible for its own funding issues. A warning system was set up to determine when they were understaffed. Employees subverted it for their own personal financial gain. Ergo, they broke it they own it.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
Its almost like things cost money. Are you not smart enough to understand this simple concept unless it is repeated to you by Foxnews?

Well first off, I rarely watch TV, much less Fox news. Tell me Einstein, how well has all the money we have thrown at education worked out? Highest per capita spending yet we can't even break the top 20 countries for quality of education?
 

cabri

Diamond Member
Nov 3, 2012
3,616
1
81
This isn't about whether or not the VA is at fault, as they clearly are. It's just that the idea that they are awash in funding is incorrect.

They did not utilize the funding that was available.
There were authorized positions for physicians and support staff that were not filled.

That is a fault of management unless one can show that there are no qualified people either in the geographical area of the VA facility or none that applied for a position and were willing to relocate.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,288
136
By your own facts, the funding was raised in line with inflation-maybe a little low but that's what you do when you're looking at productivity reports that say you're adequately staffed.

Eskimo, I know you like to blame Congress as much as possible. Sometimes, its well deserved. In this case however, the VA is responsible for its own funding issues. A warning system was set up to determine when they were understaffed. Employees subverted it for their own personal financial gain. Ergo, they broke it they own it.

I don't know how you got the impression that I was blaming Congress from what I wrote.
 

DeadFred

Platinum Member
Jun 4, 2011
2,740
29
91
I think some decent oversight is needed before throwing any more money at the problem, lest they spend another $500 million on a conference room and some office makeovers. In the meantime let those who need care now get it wherever they wish, that's not a lot to ask is it?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,288
136
You were arguing they were under funded. I was just making sure we were on the same page on why they were underfunded.

I was not actually arguing that they were underfunded, I was responding to Genx87 who was saying that their funding had increased 235% since 2001. The fact that their per-patient funding had increased at slightly less than the rate of health care inflation is important context to that statement.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
The VA consistently matches or outperforms private hospitals in study after study in both quality and efficiency. Additionally, it is uniquely positioned to deal with injuries and illnesses that are quite common among veteran populations but quite rare in the general population.

I get the feeling you guys have not thought this through.

They don't need to. It's the word that's been passed down from on high. It's one of the new memes coming from the American right. The 'private sector' is salivating at the chance to take over the VA. Money, money, money...
 

DeadFred

Platinum Member
Jun 4, 2011
2,740
29
91
They don't need to. It's the word that's been passed down from on high. It's one of the new memes coming from the American right. The 'private sector' is salivating at the chance to take over the VA. Money, money, money...
Oh please! If the VA were privatized it would pay the hospitals and doctors just like medicare does now, a pittance.
 

TerryMathews

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,464
2
0
I was not actually arguing that they were underfunded, I was responding to Genx87 who was saying that their funding had increased 235% since 2001. The fact that their per-patient funding had increased at slightly less than the rate of health care inflation is important context to that statement.

My mistake then, I didn't realize you thought the VA was adequately funded. :beer:
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,288
136
My mistake then, I didn't realize you thought the VA was adequately funded. :beer:

I'm not sure if it is or not, but regardless if the VA isn't being truthful about their circumstances they have only themselves to blame.
 

TerryMathews

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,464
2
0
I'm not sure if it is or not, but regardless if the VA isn't being truthful about their circumstances they have only themselves to blame.

On that we completely agree.

Every person who participated in this fraud to receive bonuses should spend 20 to life in prison.
 

cabri

Diamond Member
Nov 3, 2012
3,616
1
81
On that we completely agree.

Every person who participated in this fraud to receive bonuses should spend 20 to life in prison.

They will be allowed to resign with any charges be brought.
Maybe a low level peon to satisfy Congress will become a sacrificial goat.

The actual truth will be hidden by the bureaucracy.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
The VA has had the funds to fill authorized positions.

They never filled them.

Build the facilities, but who will staff them?


http://news.yahoo.com/senators-reach-bipartisan-deal-veterans-healthcare-181527021.html


Note that they had the funding for staff; just never employed the people.
Another thing that needs to be looked at is why?

The article doesn't say where the $500M was leftover from. It likely wasn't the VA.

Nice bit of unfounded attribution as a slime attack, however.
 

cuafpr

Member
Nov 5, 2009
179
1
76
1) VA has the money it just isn't used right (ala the 500m used on office decor)

2) what offsets are being proposed to cover this increased in funding to the VA or does

3) what else is tacked into this bill that wont be talked about but passed with it ?