Dell Mini 10 with Windows 7 clean install intriguingly slow using Firefox

Aeridyne

Senior member
Nov 25, 2004
242
0
71
Got this netbook that has an Intel atom 1.6 Ghz processor in it. And that may be the problem in and of itself. Basically installed Windows 7 ultimate without a hitch, did all the updates, installed latest firefox (version 30 currently) & flash, then proceeded to try and watch a youtube video. This is generally my first test of a system I expect might have issues with speed, and it did, extremely poor playback, a few frames here and there and very chopped up sound.

I figured this might the case as I was watching how long it took to do updates, and how long it took just for firefox to come up at all, switch tabs, do a google search etc. Pulled up task manager and the cpu is pretty much sitting at 100% just sitting at google doing nothing with 1 page up in firefox & task manager running.

So, here's what I have tried so far;

1. Disabled system restore.
2. Turned off the Search Indexing service
3. Turned off nearly all visual enhancements in system properties except the 1st, 3rd & 4th from the bottom.

I'm guessing the little Atom processor just doesn't have the power to run the fat ass browsers anymore (they seem to use so much more resources than they used to, but I guess that's always a constant really.)

Wondering if there is a way I can salvage this thing and get it to function better & use less cpu? I'd really like to get 7 functioning and usable, but this little cpu seems to be quite limited unfortunately. Otherwise I guess perhaps Ubuntu or something might be faster & usable on it but I'm not really sure, or that it would even work. I also haven't touched a linux/unix system in years and had to load windows straight off the hard drive as I couldn't get any external drives to recognize and boot on this thing, but they came up fine after windows was loaded.

Hoping someone might have some ideas to make watching videos & browsing on this little guy possible, I hate to just call it junk at this point when there's nothing really wrong with it other than XP being no longer supported, which I'm sure would have run better on it :/
 

ninaholic37

Golden Member
Apr 13, 2012
1,883
31
91
If it had XP, it must have something old (2008?) like the Atom Z520 or Atom N270 right? Putting Windows 7 Ultimate on that seems kind of odd. You might be better off keeping XP (you can normally restore XP by hitting Ctrl-F11 when you see the Dell startup screen) or using a light Linux distro, and running Youtube videos at below standard settings (240p or less).

You can try Pale Moon Atom version (based on Firefox 24ESR) or an even older version of Firefox to see if they handle Google.com better. You might have to disable Flash, javascript, and images when browsing on that CPU. Good luck :D
 

javier_machuk

Member
Jul 28, 2011
60
0
66
depends on which atom you have.. earlier atoms (eg: N270) don't have gpu accelerated video decoding, at least not for the codecs that you need to play flash videos. Without that the cpu is not strong enought to decode the video... if it is one of the newer atoms with gpu decoding it should be able to play the videos.
 

Torn Mind

Lifer
Nov 25, 2012
12,046
2,763
136
Firefox is an utter hog in "tight quarters", so to speak. In other words, if you have a minimal system, expect it to get choked. It guzzles down RAM, so if you don't have at least two gigs, you'll be bogged down as the poor thing accesses the awfully slow page file stored on the hard disk. It accesses the hard drive a lot, and it taxes the CPU heavily.
 

gmaster456

Golden Member
Sep 7, 2011
1,877
0
71
Those netbooks were slow back in 2008. Running Windows 7 with the latest flash, firefox and trying to play youtube will bring it to its knees. It's probably running the Intel GMA 950 and those had next to no graphics power to speak of. You're better off running XP (although I don't really recommend it) or a light version of linux. Maxing out the RAM and putting in an SSD would speed some things up but the CPU and graphics are going to be a huge bottleneck.

Also, seamonkey is a fairly light browser. You could try running that and see what happens.